• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

R. Geraghty, R. Lombardo, C. Yuan, N. Davis, L. Tzelves, A. Petrik, H. Jung, G. Gambaro, T. Tailly, A. Neisius, A. Skolarikos, B. Somani

. 2023 ; 210 (6) : 876-887. [pub] 20230905

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24000495

PURPOSE: We sought to determine which treatment between flexible ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy has a better stone-free rate in pediatric patients (<18 years) with renal or proximal ureteric stones (<2 cm). Subanalysis for all outcomes for randomized controlled trials only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, we identified studies (randomized clinical trials and prospective comparative nonrandomized studies) published until August 2022 reporting surgical outcomes of pediatrics patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy with renal or proximal ureteric stones <2 cm (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022378790). Only randomized controlled trials were considered for meta-analysis. Stone-free rate, operative time, and complications were analyzed. Analysis was performed in R. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies identified, of which 3 were randomized clinical trials and 4 had data on renal stones. A total of 669 patients were analyzed. Mean age ranged from 4.4 to 12.4 years. The shock wave lithotripsy group presented a range of stone-free rate between 21 and 90% while the flexible ureteroscopy group presented a range of stone-free rates between 37% and 97%. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only (n=302) demonstrated significantly higher stone-free rate in flexible ureteroscopy vs shock wave lithotripsy (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.33, P = 0.01), operative time (mean difference = +16.4 minutes, 95% CI: 7.3-25.5, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (mean difference = +0.25 days, 95% CI: 0.14-0.36, P < 0.001). But no difference in fluoroscopy exposure time (mean difference = -21.0 seconds, 95% CI: -42.6 to 0.56, P = 0.07), Clavien I-II (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.71-2.12, P = 0.45) or Clavien III-V complications (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.32-3.42, P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Flexible ureteroscopy has a significantly higher stone-free rate than shock wave lithotripsy, with no difference in complication rate or fluoroscopy exposure time, and significantly higher operative times and hospital stay. However, the current evidence base for this is weak and further randomized trials are needed.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000495
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093222.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/JU.0000000000003696 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37669621
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Geraghty, Robert $u Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
245    10
$a Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / $c R. Geraghty, R. Lombardo, C. Yuan, N. Davis, L. Tzelves, A. Petrik, H. Jung, G. Gambaro, T. Tailly, A. Neisius, A. Skolarikos, B. Somani
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: We sought to determine which treatment between flexible ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy has a better stone-free rate in pediatric patients (<18 years) with renal or proximal ureteric stones (<2 cm). Subanalysis for all outcomes for randomized controlled trials only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, we identified studies (randomized clinical trials and prospective comparative nonrandomized studies) published until August 2022 reporting surgical outcomes of pediatrics patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy with renal or proximal ureteric stones <2 cm (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022378790). Only randomized controlled trials were considered for meta-analysis. Stone-free rate, operative time, and complications were analyzed. Analysis was performed in R. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies identified, of which 3 were randomized clinical trials and 4 had data on renal stones. A total of 669 patients were analyzed. Mean age ranged from 4.4 to 12.4 years. The shock wave lithotripsy group presented a range of stone-free rate between 21 and 90% while the flexible ureteroscopy group presented a range of stone-free rates between 37% and 97%. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only (n=302) demonstrated significantly higher stone-free rate in flexible ureteroscopy vs shock wave lithotripsy (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.33, P = 0.01), operative time (mean difference = +16.4 minutes, 95% CI: 7.3-25.5, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (mean difference = +0.25 days, 95% CI: 0.14-0.36, P < 0.001). But no difference in fluoroscopy exposure time (mean difference = -21.0 seconds, 95% CI: -42.6 to 0.56, P = 0.07), Clavien I-II (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.71-2.12, P = 0.45) or Clavien III-V complications (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.32-3.42, P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Flexible ureteroscopy has a significantly higher stone-free rate than shock wave lithotripsy, with no difference in complication rate or fluoroscopy exposure time, and significantly higher operative times and hospital stay. However, the current evidence base for this is weak and further randomized trials are needed.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a ureteroskopie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D018666
650    12
$a urologie $7 D014572
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a ledvinové kameny $x terapie $x etiologie $7 D007669
650    12
$a litotripse $x škodlivé účinky $7 D008096
650    12
$a kameny v močovodu $x terapie $7 D014514
650    12
$a močové kameny $x etiologie $7 D014545
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lombardo, Riccardo $u Sant 'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Yuan, Cathy $u Division of Gastroenterology & Cochrane UGPD Group, Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Davis, Niall $u Department of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
700    1_
$a Tzelves, Lazaros $u Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece
700    1_
$a Petrik, Ales $u Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jung, Helene $u Department of Urology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
700    1_
$a Gambaro, Giovanni $u Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
700    1_
$a Tailly, Thomas $u Department of Urology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Neisius, Andreas $u Department of Urology, Bruederkrankenhaus Trier, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Trier, Germany
700    1_
$a Skolarikos, Andreas $u Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece
700    1_
$a Somani, Bhaskar $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000262486478
773    0_
$w MED00003040 $t The Journal of urology $x 1527-3792 $g Roč. 210, č. 6 (2023), s. 876-887
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37669621 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093219 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049262 $s 1210189
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 210 $c 6 $d 876-887 $e 20230905 $i 1527-3792 $m The Journal of urology $n J Urol $x MED00003040
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace