• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Color Doppler ultrasound versus CT angiography for DIEP flap planning: A randomized controlled trial

A. Bajus, L. Streit, T. Kubek, A. Novák, J. Vaníček, O. Šedivý, A. Berkeš, KC. Bayezid, L. Kunovský, L. Dražan

. 2023 ; 86 (-) : 48-57. [pub] 20230723

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24000859

BACKGROUND: Identifying relevant perforators is crucial in planning a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) has gained popularity for localizing perforators; however, current evidence on its efficiency is still inconclusive. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of CDU with that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in localizing and selecting the relevant perforators. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction (uni- or bilateral) were randomly assigned to the CDU group (i.e., CDU was performed to map and select the relevant perforators preoperatively) or the CTA+CDU group (i.e., mapping was based on CTA and supplemented by CDU). CDU was performed by the same surgeon with a well-defined sonography experience from our previous study. The reference XY coordinates of the dissected perforators were measured intraoperatively, and deviations from preoperatively deducted coordinates were calculated (ΔCDU or ΔCTA+CDU). The flaps were categorized according to the number of dissected perforators, and adherence to the preoperative strategy was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 22 patients (30 flaps) in the CTA+CDU group and 27 (39 flaps) patients in the CDU group were evaluated. The average ΔCDU (0.6 cm) was significantly lower than the average ΔCTA+CDU (1.0 cm) (p < 0.001). Adherence to the mapping-based dissection strategy was higher in the CDU group; however, the difference was insignificant (p = 0.092). CONCLUSION: CDU is not inferior to CTA + CDU in localizing and selecting relevant DIEA perforators. Therefore, CDU mapping is a possible complementary or substitute modality for CTA mapping.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000859
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240618105339.0
007      
ta
008      
240109e20230723ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.042 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37696215
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Bajus, Adam $u Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0318567
245    10
$a Color Doppler ultrasound versus CT angiography for DIEP flap planning: A randomized controlled trial / $c A. Bajus, L. Streit, T. Kubek, A. Novák, J. Vaníček, O. Šedivý, A. Berkeš, KC. Bayezid, L. Kunovský, L. Dražan
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Identifying relevant perforators is crucial in planning a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) has gained popularity for localizing perforators; however, current evidence on its efficiency is still inconclusive. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of CDU with that of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in localizing and selecting the relevant perforators. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction (uni- or bilateral) were randomly assigned to the CDU group (i.e., CDU was performed to map and select the relevant perforators preoperatively) or the CTA+CDU group (i.e., mapping was based on CTA and supplemented by CDU). CDU was performed by the same surgeon with a well-defined sonography experience from our previous study. The reference XY coordinates of the dissected perforators were measured intraoperatively, and deviations from preoperatively deducted coordinates were calculated (ΔCDU or ΔCTA+CDU). The flaps were categorized according to the number of dissected perforators, and adherence to the preoperative strategy was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 22 patients (30 flaps) in the CTA+CDU group and 27 (39 flaps) patients in the CDU group were evaluated. The average ΔCDU (0.6 cm) was significantly lower than the average ΔCTA+CDU (1.0 cm) (p < 0.001). Adherence to the mapping-based dissection strategy was higher in the CDU group; however, the difference was insignificant (p = 0.092). CONCLUSION: CDU is not inferior to CTA + CDU in localizing and selecting relevant DIEA perforators. Therefore, CDU mapping is a possible complementary or substitute modality for CTA mapping.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a CT angiografie $x metody $7 D000072226
650    12
$a perforátorový lalok $x chirurgie $7 D061525
650    _2
$a arteriae epigastricae $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D019074
650    12
$a mamoplastika $x metody $7 D016462
650    _2
$a ultrasonografie dopplerovská barevná $7 D018615
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Streit, Libor $u Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: libor.streit@med.muni.cz
700    1_
$a Kubek, Tomáš $u Department of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Novák, Adam $u Department of Radiology, St. Anne's University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vaníček, Jiří $u Department of Radiology, St. Anne's University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šedivý, Ondřej $u Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Berkeš, Andrej $u Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0318569
700    1_
$a Bayezid, K Can $u Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kunovský, Lukáš $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dražan, Luboš $u Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00008968 $t Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery $x 1878-0539 $g Roč. 86 (20230723), s. 48-57
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37696215 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240618105341 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049459 $s 1210553
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 86 $c - $d 48-57 $e 20230723 $i 1878-0539 $m Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery $n J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg $x MED00008968
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...