-
Something wrong with this record ?
Outcomes of Alcohol Septal Ablation in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
J. Veselka, M. Liebregts, R. Cooper, L. Faber, J. Januska, KH. Tesarkova, PR. Hansen, H. Seggewiss, E. Hansvenclova, J. Bonaventura, V. Vejtasova, J. Ten Berg, RH. Stables, M. Jensovsky
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Dyspnea etiology MeSH
- Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic * complications diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Cardiac Surgical Procedures * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Ventricular Outflow Obstruction, Left * MeSH
- Ventricular Outflow Obstruction * surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Propensity Score MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: The current ACC/AHA guidelines on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) caution that alcohol septal ablation (ASA) might be less effective in patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) ≥ 100 mm Hg. METHODS: We used a multinational registry to evaluate the outcome of ASA patients according to baseline LVOTO. RESULTS: A total of 1346 ASA patients were enrolled and followed for 5.8 ± 4.7 years (7764 patient-years). The patients with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg were significantly older (61 ± 14 years vs 57 ± 13 years; P < 0.01), more often women (60% vs 45%; P < 0.01), and had a more pronounced HCM phenotype than those with baseline LVOTO < 100 mm Hg. There were no significant differences in the occurrences of 30-day major cardiovascular adverse events in the 2 groups. After propensity score matching (2 groups, 257 pairs of patients), the long-term survival was similar in both groups (P = 0.10), the relative reduction of LVOTO was higher in the group with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg (82 ± 21% vs 73 ± 26%; P < 0.01), but the residual resting LVOTO remained higher in this group (23 ± 29 mm Hg vs 13 ± 13 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Dyspnoea (NYHA functional class) at the most recent clinical check-up was similar in the 2 groups (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 1.7 ± 0.7; P = 0.85), and patients with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg underwent more reinterventions (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After propensity matching, ASA patients with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg had similar survival and dyspnoea as patients with baseline LVOTO < 100 mm Hg, but their residual LVOTO and risk of repeated procedures were higher.
Cardiocentre Podlesi Trinec Czech Republic
Comprehensive Heart Failure Centre University Clinic Wuerzburg Wuerzburg Germany
Department of Cardiology Herlev and Gentofte Hospital Hellerup Denmark
Department of Cardiology St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein Nieuwegein The Netherlands
Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine John Moores University Liverpool England United Kingdom
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000915
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093500.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.06.417 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37355228
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Veselka, Josef $u Department of Cardiology, Second Medical School, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: veselka.josef@seznam.cz
- 245 10
- $a Outcomes of Alcohol Septal Ablation in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis / $c J. Veselka, M. Liebregts, R. Cooper, L. Faber, J. Januska, KH. Tesarkova, PR. Hansen, H. Seggewiss, E. Hansvenclova, J. Bonaventura, V. Vejtasova, J. Ten Berg, RH. Stables, M. Jensovsky
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The current ACC/AHA guidelines on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) caution that alcohol septal ablation (ASA) might be less effective in patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) ≥ 100 mm Hg. METHODS: We used a multinational registry to evaluate the outcome of ASA patients according to baseline LVOTO. RESULTS: A total of 1346 ASA patients were enrolled and followed for 5.8 ± 4.7 years (7764 patient-years). The patients with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg were significantly older (61 ± 14 years vs 57 ± 13 years; P < 0.01), more often women (60% vs 45%; P < 0.01), and had a more pronounced HCM phenotype than those with baseline LVOTO < 100 mm Hg. There were no significant differences in the occurrences of 30-day major cardiovascular adverse events in the 2 groups. After propensity score matching (2 groups, 257 pairs of patients), the long-term survival was similar in both groups (P = 0.10), the relative reduction of LVOTO was higher in the group with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg (82 ± 21% vs 73 ± 26%; P < 0.01), but the residual resting LVOTO remained higher in this group (23 ± 29 mm Hg vs 13 ± 13 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Dyspnoea (NYHA functional class) at the most recent clinical check-up was similar in the 2 groups (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 1.7 ± 0.7; P = 0.85), and patients with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg underwent more reinterventions (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After propensity matching, ASA patients with baseline LVOTO ≥ 100 mm Hg had similar survival and dyspnoea as patients with baseline LVOTO < 100 mm Hg, but their residual LVOTO and risk of repeated procedures were higher.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a obstrukce výtokového traktu levé komory srdeční $7 D000092242
- 650 _2
- $a tendenční skóre $7 D057216
- 650 12
- $a hypertrofická kardiomyopatie $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x chirurgie $7 D002312
- 650 12
- $a kardiochirurgické výkony $7 D006348
- 650 _2
- $a dyspnoe $x etiologie $7 D004417
- 650 12
- $a obstrukce výtoku ze srdeční komory $x chirurgie $7 D014694
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Liebregts, Max $u Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Cooper, Robert $u Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, John Moores University, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Faber, Lothar $u Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Januska, Jaroslav $u Cardiocentre Podlesi, Trinec, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tesarkova, Klara Hulikova $u Department of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hansen, Peter Riis $u Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
- 700 1_
- $a Seggewiss, Hubert $u Comprehensive Heart Failure Centre, University Clinic Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Hansvenclova, Eva $u Department of Cardiology, Second Medical School, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bonaventura, Jiri $u Department of Cardiology, Second Medical School, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vejtasova, Veronika $u Department of Cardiology, Second Medical School, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ten Berg, Jurriën $u Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Stables, Rodney Hilton $u Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Jensovsky, Michael $u Department of Cardiology, Second Medical School, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001009 $t Canadian journal of cardiology $x 1916-7075 $g Roč. 39, č. 11 (2023), s. 1622-1629
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37355228 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093457 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049500 $s 1210609
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 39 $c 11 $d 1622-1629 $e 20230622 $i 1916-7075 $m Canadian journal of cardiology $n Can J Cardiol $x MED00001009
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109