Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Cranial Electrode Belt Position Improves Diagnostic Possibilities of Electrical Impedance Tomography during Laparoscopic Surgery with Capnoperitoneum

K. Koldova, A. Rara, M. Muller, T. Tyll, K. Roubik

. 2023 ; 23 (20) : . [pub] 20231023

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
SGS23/198/OHK4/3T/17 Czech Technical University in Prague

Laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum brings many advantages to patients, but also emphasizes the negative impact of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation on the lungs. Even though many studies use electrical impedance tomography (EIT) for lung monitoring during these surgeries, it is not clear what the best position of the electrode belt on the patient's thorax is, considering the cranial shift of the diaphragm. We monitored 16 patients undergoing a laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum using EIT with two independent electrode belts at different tomographic levels: in the standard position of the 4th-6th intercostal space, as recommended by the manufacturer, and in a more cranial position at the level of the axilla. Functional residual capacity (FRC) was measured, and a recruitment maneuver was performed at the end of the procedure by raising the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) by 5 cmH2O. The results based on the spectral analysis of the EIT signal show that the ventilation-related impedance changes are not detectable by the belt in the standard position. In general, the cranial belt position might be more suitable for the lung monitoring during the capnoperitoneum since the ventilation signal remains dominant in the obtained impedance waveform. FRC was significantly decreased by the capnoperitoneum and remained lower also after desufflation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24001001
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093541.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/s23208644 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37896737
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Koldova, Kristyna $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000388727481
245    10
$a Cranial Electrode Belt Position Improves Diagnostic Possibilities of Electrical Impedance Tomography during Laparoscopic Surgery with Capnoperitoneum / $c K. Koldova, A. Rara, M. Muller, T. Tyll, K. Roubik
520    9_
$a Laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum brings many advantages to patients, but also emphasizes the negative impact of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation on the lungs. Even though many studies use electrical impedance tomography (EIT) for lung monitoring during these surgeries, it is not clear what the best position of the electrode belt on the patient's thorax is, considering the cranial shift of the diaphragm. We monitored 16 patients undergoing a laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum using EIT with two independent electrode belts at different tomographic levels: in the standard position of the 4th-6th intercostal space, as recommended by the manufacturer, and in a more cranial position at the level of the axilla. Functional residual capacity (FRC) was measured, and a recruitment maneuver was performed at the end of the procedure by raising the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) by 5 cmH2O. The results based on the spectral analysis of the EIT signal show that the ventilation-related impedance changes are not detectable by the belt in the standard position. In general, the cranial belt position might be more suitable for the lung monitoring during the capnoperitoneum since the ventilation signal remains dominant in the obtained impedance waveform. FRC was significantly decreased by the capnoperitoneum and remained lower also after desufflation.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a elektrická impedance $7 D017097
650    12
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a tomografie $x metody $7 D014054
650    12
$a laparoskopie $7 D010535
650    _2
$a elektrody $7 D004566
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Rara, Ales $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine First Faculty of Medicine, The Military University Hospital Prague, Charles University, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Muller, Martin $u Clinic of Anesthesiology, Critical Care 1st Faculty of Medicine, Thomayer University Hospital Prague, Charles University, 140 59 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339871893
700    1_
$a Tyll, Tomas $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine First Faculty of Medicine, The Military University Hospital Prague, Charles University, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Roubik, Karel $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000158136355
773    0_
$w MED00008309 $t Sensors $x 1424-8220 $g Roč. 23, č. 20 (2023)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37896737 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093538 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049553 $s 1210695
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 23 $c 20 $e 20231023 $i 1424-8220 $m Sensors $n Sensors Basel $x MED00008309
GRA    __
$a SGS23/198/OHK4/3T/17 $p Czech Technical University in Prague
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...