BACKGROUND: Face transplantation has emerged as a viable solution for reconstructing the most complex facial injuries. Prior work has demonstrated that surgical revisions are necessary to optimize outcomes. The authors' group has updated the previous report of revisions in their cohort, quantified and described which revisions were performed for functional, aesthetic, or mixed indications, and described the rationale, safety, and long-term outcomes of these revisions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the authors' ten face transplants was performed from April 2009 to February 2023. The patients' medical records, preoperative facial defects, and operative reports (index and secondary revisions) were reviewed. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. One patient underwent irreversible acute on chronic allograft rejection and received a second face transplant. The average number of revisions was 5.2 per patient (range, 2 to 11 procedures). The median time interval from transplantation to first revision was 4 months (range, 1 to 21 months). Median follow-up was 106 months (range 39 to 142 months). Most interventions consisted of debulking the allograft or revising the periorbital tissues. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we report longer term data on revision surgeries needed in face transplant recipients. Patients should expect to undergo revisions for both functional and aesthetic considerations. Although the majority of revisions are performed within two years following transplantation, revisions can be safely performed at any time point. Shared decision-making between the patient and provider team is essential in deciding which revisions are performed and when.

Division of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT USA

Yale New Haven Transplantation Center New Haven CT USA

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org