-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni and prediction tools of its antimicrobial resistance
N. Strakova, H. Michova, E. Shagieva, P. Ovesna, R. Karpiskova, K. Demnerova
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
18-16549S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
RO0523
Ministerstvo Zemědělství
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky farmakologie MeSH
- bakteriální léková rezistence genetika MeSH
- Campylobacter jejuni * genetika MeSH
- genotyp MeSH
- kampylobakterové infekce * mikrobiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- multilokusová sekvenční typizace MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Although Campylobacter jejuni is the pathogen responsible for the most common foodborne illness, tracing of the infection source remains challenging due to its highly variable genome. Therefore, one of the aim of the study was to compare three genotyping methods (MLST, PFGE, and mP-BIT) to determine the most effective genotyping tool. C. jejuni strains were divided into 4 clusters based on strain similarity in the cgMLST dendrogram. Subsequently, the dendrograms of the 3 tested methods were compared to determine the accuracy of each method compared to the reference cgMLST method. Moreover, a cost-benefit analysis has showed that MLST had the highest inverse discrimination index (97%) and required less workflow, time, fewer consumables, and low bacterial sample quantity. PFGE was shown to be obsolete both because of its low discriminatory power and the complexity of the procedure. Similarly, mP‐BIT showed low separation results, which was compensated by its high availability. Therefore, our data showed that MLST is the optimal tool for genotyping C. jejuni. Another aim was to compare the antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and tetracycline in C. jejuni strains isolated from human, water, air, food, and animal samples by two gene sequence-based prediction methods and to compare them with the actual susceptibility of C. jejuni strains using the disc diffusion method. Both tools, ResFinder and RGI, synchronously predict the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. jejuni and either can be used.
Department of Public Health Medical Faculty Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Veterinary Research Institute Hudcova 296 70 Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24003885
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240305161720.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240305s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-023-01093-5 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37816942
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Strakova, Nicol $u Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 296/70, Brno, Czech Republic. nicol.strakova@vri.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000338743777
- 245 10
- $a Genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni and prediction tools of its antimicrobial resistance / $c N. Strakova, H. Michova, E. Shagieva, P. Ovesna, R. Karpiskova, K. Demnerova
- 520 9_
- $a Although Campylobacter jejuni is the pathogen responsible for the most common foodborne illness, tracing of the infection source remains challenging due to its highly variable genome. Therefore, one of the aim of the study was to compare three genotyping methods (MLST, PFGE, and mP-BIT) to determine the most effective genotyping tool. C. jejuni strains were divided into 4 clusters based on strain similarity in the cgMLST dendrogram. Subsequently, the dendrograms of the 3 tested methods were compared to determine the accuracy of each method compared to the reference cgMLST method. Moreover, a cost-benefit analysis has showed that MLST had the highest inverse discrimination index (97%) and required less workflow, time, fewer consumables, and low bacterial sample quantity. PFGE was shown to be obsolete both because of its low discriminatory power and the complexity of the procedure. Similarly, mP‐BIT showed low separation results, which was compensated by its high availability. Therefore, our data showed that MLST is the optimal tool for genotyping C. jejuni. Another aim was to compare the antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and tetracycline in C. jejuni strains isolated from human, water, air, food, and animal samples by two gene sequence-based prediction methods and to compare them with the actual susceptibility of C. jejuni strains using the disc diffusion method. Both tools, ResFinder and RGI, synchronously predict the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. jejuni and either can be used.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x farmakologie $7 D000900
- 650 12
- $a Campylobacter jejuni $x genetika $7 D016123
- 650 _2
- $a multilokusová sekvenční typizace $7 D058885
- 650 _2
- $a genotyp $7 D005838
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální léková rezistence $x genetika $7 D024881
- 650 12
- $a kampylobakterové infekce $x mikrobiologie $7 D002169
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiální testy citlivosti $7 D008826
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Michova, Hana $u Laboratory of Food Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Shagieva, Ekaterina $u Laboratory of Food Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ovesna, Petra $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Karpiskova, Renata $u Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Demnerova, Katerina $u Laboratory of Food Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 69, č. 1 (2024), s. 207-219
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37816942 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240305 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240305161717 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2059334 $s 1213637
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 69 $c 1 $d 207-219 $e 20231010 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
- GRA __
- $a 18-16549S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
- GRA __
- $a RO0523 $p Ministerstvo Zemědělství
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240305