-
Something wrong with this record ?
Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis who are initiating disease-modifying therapy with natalizumab compared with BRACETD first-line therapies
H. Butzkueven, T. Kalincik, F. Patti, M. Slee, B. Weinstock-Guttman, K. Buzzard, O. Skibina, R. Alroughani, A. Prat, M. Girard, D. Horakova, EK. Havrdova, A. Van der Walt, S. Eichau, R. Hyde, N. Campbell, K. Bodhinathan, T. Spelman, MSBase Investigators
Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2017
Free Medical Journals
from 2008
PubMed Central
from 2008
Europe PubMed Central
from 2008
ProQuest Central
from 2016-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2016-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2008
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Aggressive disease control soon after multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis may prevent irreversible neurological damage, and therefore early initiation of a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is of clinical relevance. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with MS who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or a BRACETD therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate). DESIGN: This retrospective analysis utilized data from MSBase to create a matched population allowing comparison of first-line natalizumab to first-line BRACETD. METHODS: This study included patients who initiated treatment either with natalizumab or a BRACETD DMT within 1 year of MS diagnosis and continued treatment for ⩾6 months, after which patients could switch DMTs or discontinue treatment. Patients had a minimum follow-up time of ⩾60 months from initiation. A subgroup analysis compared the natalizumab group to patients in the BRACETD group who escalated therapy after 6 months. Outcomes included unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARRs), time-to-first relapse, time-to-first confirmed disability improvement (CDI), and time-to-first confirmed disability worsening (CDW). RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 355 BRACETD patients were matched to 355 natalizumab patients. Patients initiating natalizumab were less likely to experience a relapse over the duration of follow-up, with ARRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.080 (0.070-0.092) for natalizumab patients and 0.191 (0.178-0.205) for BRACETD patients (p < 0.0001). A Cox regression model of time-to-first relapse showed a reduced risk of relapse for natalizumab patients [hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.52 (0.42-0.65); p < 0.001] and a more favorable time-to-first CDI. The risk of CDW was similar between groups. The subgroup analysis showed an increased relapse risk as well as a significantly higher risk of CDW for BRACETD patients. CONCLUSION: Early initiation of natalizumab produced long-term benefits in relapse outcomes in comparison with BRACETD, regardless of a subsequent escalation in therapy.
Biogen Cambridge MA USA at the time of this analysis
Burnet Institute Melbourne VIC Australia
CHUM and Universite de Montreal Montreal QC Canada
Department of Neurology Box Hill Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Neurology Box Hill Hospital Monash University Box Hill VIC Australia
Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain
Department of Neurology Jacobs MS Center for Treatment and Research Buffalo NY USA
Department of Neurology The Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
Division of Neurology Department of Medicine Amiri Hospital Sharq Kuwait
Flinders University Adelaide SA Australia
Neuroimmunology Centre Department of Neurology The Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24005723
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240412131019.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240405e20240226enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/17562864231221331 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38414723
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Butzkueven, Helmut $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Alfred Campus, Monash University, 6/99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339408727
- 245 10
- $a Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis who are initiating disease-modifying therapy with natalizumab compared with BRACETD first-line therapies / $c H. Butzkueven, T. Kalincik, F. Patti, M. Slee, B. Weinstock-Guttman, K. Buzzard, O. Skibina, R. Alroughani, A. Prat, M. Girard, D. Horakova, EK. Havrdova, A. Van der Walt, S. Eichau, R. Hyde, N. Campbell, K. Bodhinathan, T. Spelman, MSBase Investigators
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Aggressive disease control soon after multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis may prevent irreversible neurological damage, and therefore early initiation of a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is of clinical relevance. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with MS who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or a BRACETD therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate). DESIGN: This retrospective analysis utilized data from MSBase to create a matched population allowing comparison of first-line natalizumab to first-line BRACETD. METHODS: This study included patients who initiated treatment either with natalizumab or a BRACETD DMT within 1 year of MS diagnosis and continued treatment for ⩾6 months, after which patients could switch DMTs or discontinue treatment. Patients had a minimum follow-up time of ⩾60 months from initiation. A subgroup analysis compared the natalizumab group to patients in the BRACETD group who escalated therapy after 6 months. Outcomes included unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARRs), time-to-first relapse, time-to-first confirmed disability improvement (CDI), and time-to-first confirmed disability worsening (CDW). RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 355 BRACETD patients were matched to 355 natalizumab patients. Patients initiating natalizumab were less likely to experience a relapse over the duration of follow-up, with ARRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.080 (0.070-0.092) for natalizumab patients and 0.191 (0.178-0.205) for BRACETD patients (p < 0.0001). A Cox regression model of time-to-first relapse showed a reduced risk of relapse for natalizumab patients [hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.52 (0.42-0.65); p < 0.001] and a more favorable time-to-first CDI. The risk of CDW was similar between groups. The subgroup analysis showed an increased relapse risk as well as a significantly higher risk of CDW for BRACETD patients. CONCLUSION: Early initiation of natalizumab produced long-term benefits in relapse outcomes in comparison with BRACETD, regardless of a subsequent escalation in therapy.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kalincik, Tomas $u Neuroimmunology Centre, Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Patti, Francesco $u Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies 'GF Ingrassia', University of Catania, Catania, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000269230846
- 700 1_
- $a Slee, Mark $u Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca $u Department of Neurology, Jacobs MS Center for Treatment and Research, Buffalo, NY, USA $1 https://orcid.org/000000016732151X
- 700 1_
- $a Buzzard, Katherine $u Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Skibina, Olga $u Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Alroughani, Raed $u Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Sharq, Kuwait $1 https://orcid.org/0000000154365804
- 700 1_
- $a Prat, Alexandre $u CHUM and Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Girard, Marc $u CHUM and Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Horakova, Dana $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Havrdova, Eva Kubala $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Van der Walt, Anneke $u Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000242787003
- 700 1_
- $a Eichau, Sara $u Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Hyde, Robert $u Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA, at the time of this analysis
- 700 1_
- $a Campbell, Nolan $u Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Bodhinathan, Karthik $u Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Spelman, Tim $u Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 710 2_
- $a MSBase Investigators
- 773 0_
- $w MED00177176 $t Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders $x 1756-2856 $g Roč. 17 (20240226), s. 17562864231221331
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38414723 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240412131012 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2076004 $s 1215485
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 17 $c - $d 17562864231221331 $e 20240226 $i 1756-2856 $m Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders $n Ther Adv Neurol Disord $x MED00177176
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240405