• Something wrong with this record ?

The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid test in the context of four SARS-CoV-2 variants

M. Fajfr, L. Rashad Hassan Muhammad Moolla, J. Barout, S. Sahani, R. Kukla, E. Cermakova, R. Sleha, P. Bostik

. 2024 ; 10 (1) : e23475. [pub] 20231209

Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

UNLABELLED: Rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 are commonly used for the diagnosis of Covid-19. Previously published data showed a wide range of sensitivity and specificity of RATs, but these studies were performed on relatively small numbers of samples and using only limited numbers of virus variants. The aim of the study was to evaluate the main parameters of a commonly used RAT for 4 different virus variants in comparison with PCR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A set of 2874 samples obtained from Covid-19 patients were examined both by PCR and RAT. Two commercial PCR kits (Generi Biotech, Diana Biotechnologies) and one RAT - Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid - were compared for their sensitivity and specificity in samples positive for one of the four different SARS-CoV-2 variants - B.1.258 (n = 496), Alpha (n = 645), Delta/Delta+ (n = 687), and Omicron (n = 1046). RESULTS: The sensitivity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test varied from 80.0 % in Omicron to 88.92 % in Alpha variants. The specificities of the RAT for all variants reached above 93 %. Statistically significant differences were found between the results from RAT assay in select virus variants. In addition, significantly higher sensitivity (p < 0.05) was detected in samples with higher viral loads than in those with lower. CONCLUSION: Despite the different sensitivity and specificity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test (Abbott ®) for different SARS-CoV-2 variants, this test sensitivity was proven to be always above the 80 % suggested by WHO, which makes it suitable for common use, regardless of the virus variability.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24006020
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240412130847.0
007      
ta
008      
240405s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23475 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38163144
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Fajfr, Miroslav $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid test in the context of four SARS-CoV-2 variants / $c M. Fajfr, L. Rashad Hassan Muhammad Moolla, J. Barout, S. Sahani, R. Kukla, E. Cermakova, R. Sleha, P. Bostik
520    9_
$a UNLABELLED: Rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 are commonly used for the diagnosis of Covid-19. Previously published data showed a wide range of sensitivity and specificity of RATs, but these studies were performed on relatively small numbers of samples and using only limited numbers of virus variants. The aim of the study was to evaluate the main parameters of a commonly used RAT for 4 different virus variants in comparison with PCR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A set of 2874 samples obtained from Covid-19 patients were examined both by PCR and RAT. Two commercial PCR kits (Generi Biotech, Diana Biotechnologies) and one RAT - Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid - were compared for their sensitivity and specificity in samples positive for one of the four different SARS-CoV-2 variants - B.1.258 (n = 496), Alpha (n = 645), Delta/Delta+ (n = 687), and Omicron (n = 1046). RESULTS: The sensitivity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test varied from 80.0 % in Omicron to 88.92 % in Alpha variants. The specificities of the RAT for all variants reached above 93 %. Statistically significant differences were found between the results from RAT assay in select virus variants. In addition, significantly higher sensitivity (p < 0.05) was detected in samples with higher viral loads than in those with lower. CONCLUSION: Despite the different sensitivity and specificity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test (Abbott ®) for different SARS-CoV-2 variants, this test sensitivity was proven to be always above the 80 % suggested by WHO, which makes it suitable for common use, regardless of the virus variability.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Rashad Hassan Muhammad Moolla, Laith $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Barout, Joudi $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sahani, Saaz $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kukla, Rudolf $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cermakova, Eva $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sleha, Radek $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bostik, Pavel $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00190064 $t Heliyon $x 2405-8440 $g Roč. 10, č. 1 (2024), s. e23475
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38163144 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240412130839 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2076097 $s 1215782
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 10 $c 1 $d e23475 $e 20231209 $i 2405-8440 $m Heliyon $n Heliyon $x MED00190064
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240405

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...