-
Something wrong with this record ?
The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid test in the context of four SARS-CoV-2 variants
M. Fajfr, L. Rashad Hassan Muhammad Moolla, J. Barout, S. Sahani, R. Kukla, E. Cermakova, R. Sleha, P. Bostik
Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2015
Free Medical Journals
from 2015
PubMed Central
from 2015
Europe PubMed Central
from 2015
Open Access Digital Library
from 2015-09-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2015
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
UNLABELLED: Rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 are commonly used for the diagnosis of Covid-19. Previously published data showed a wide range of sensitivity and specificity of RATs, but these studies were performed on relatively small numbers of samples and using only limited numbers of virus variants. The aim of the study was to evaluate the main parameters of a commonly used RAT for 4 different virus variants in comparison with PCR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A set of 2874 samples obtained from Covid-19 patients were examined both by PCR and RAT. Two commercial PCR kits (Generi Biotech, Diana Biotechnologies) and one RAT - Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid - were compared for their sensitivity and specificity in samples positive for one of the four different SARS-CoV-2 variants - B.1.258 (n = 496), Alpha (n = 645), Delta/Delta+ (n = 687), and Omicron (n = 1046). RESULTS: The sensitivity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test varied from 80.0 % in Omicron to 88.92 % in Alpha variants. The specificities of the RAT for all variants reached above 93 %. Statistically significant differences were found between the results from RAT assay in select virus variants. In addition, significantly higher sensitivity (p < 0.05) was detected in samples with higher viral loads than in those with lower. CONCLUSION: Despite the different sensitivity and specificity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test (Abbott ®) for different SARS-CoV-2 variants, this test sensitivity was proven to be always above the 80 % suggested by WHO, which makes it suitable for common use, regardless of the virus variability.
Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Faculty of Military Health Sciences University of Defence Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Institute of Clinical Microbiology University Hospital in Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24006020
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240412130847.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240405s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23475 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38163144
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Fajfr, Miroslav $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid test in the context of four SARS-CoV-2 variants / $c M. Fajfr, L. Rashad Hassan Muhammad Moolla, J. Barout, S. Sahani, R. Kukla, E. Cermakova, R. Sleha, P. Bostik
- 520 9_
- $a UNLABELLED: Rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 are commonly used for the diagnosis of Covid-19. Previously published data showed a wide range of sensitivity and specificity of RATs, but these studies were performed on relatively small numbers of samples and using only limited numbers of virus variants. The aim of the study was to evaluate the main parameters of a commonly used RAT for 4 different virus variants in comparison with PCR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A set of 2874 samples obtained from Covid-19 patients were examined both by PCR and RAT. Two commercial PCR kits (Generi Biotech, Diana Biotechnologies) and one RAT - Abbott PanbioTM COVID 19 Ag Rapid - were compared for their sensitivity and specificity in samples positive for one of the four different SARS-CoV-2 variants - B.1.258 (n = 496), Alpha (n = 645), Delta/Delta+ (n = 687), and Omicron (n = 1046). RESULTS: The sensitivity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test varied from 80.0 % in Omicron to 88.92 % in Alpha variants. The specificities of the RAT for all variants reached above 93 %. Statistically significant differences were found between the results from RAT assay in select virus variants. In addition, significantly higher sensitivity (p < 0.05) was detected in samples with higher viral loads than in those with lower. CONCLUSION: Despite the different sensitivity and specificity of PanbioTM COVID19 Ag Rapid test (Abbott ®) for different SARS-CoV-2 variants, this test sensitivity was proven to be always above the 80 % suggested by WHO, which makes it suitable for common use, regardless of the virus variability.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Rashad Hassan Muhammad Moolla, Laith $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Barout, Joudi $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sahani, Saaz $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kukla, Rudolf $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cermakova, Eva $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sleha, Radek $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bostik, Pavel $u Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00190064 $t Heliyon $x 2405-8440 $g Roč. 10, č. 1 (2024), s. e23475
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38163144 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240412130839 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2076097 $s 1215782
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 10 $c 1 $d e23475 $e 20231209 $i 2405-8440 $m Heliyon $n Heliyon $x MED00190064
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240405