-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Valve Hemodynamics by Valve Size and 1-Year Survival Following Implantation of the Portico Valve in the Multicenter CONFIDENCE Registry
H. Möllmann, A. Linke, L. Nombela-Franco, M. Sluka, J. Francisco Oteo Dominguez, M. Montorfano, WK. Kim, M. Arnold, M. Vasa-Nicotera, S. Fichtlscherer, L. Conradi, A. Camuglia, F. Bedogni, K. Kohli, G. Manoharan
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2022
PubMed Central
od 2022
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2017
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The CONtrolled delivery For ImproveD outcomEs with cliNiCal Evidence registry was initiated to characterize the clinical safety and device performance from experienced transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centers in Europe and Australia that use the Portico valve to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis. We herein report for the first time the valve performance at 30-day across all implanted valve sizes and the 1-year survival from this registry. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational clinical investigation of patients clinically indicated for implantation of a Portico valve in experienced TAVI centers. Patients were treated with a commercially available valve (size 23, 25, 27, or 29 mm) using either the first-generation delivery system (DS) (n = 501) or the second-generation (FlexNav) DS (n = 500). Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Echocardiographic outcomes were assessed at 30 days by an independent core laboratory, and a survival check was performed at 1 year. RESULTS: We enrolled 1001 patients (82.0 years, 62.5% female, 63.7% New York Heart Association functional class III/IV at baseline) from 27 clinical sites in 8 countries across Europe and one site in Australia. Implantation of a single valve was successful in 97.5% of subjects. Valve hemodynamics at 30 days were substantially improved relative to baseline, with large aortic valve areas and low mean gradients across all implanted valve sizes (aortic valve areas were 1.7 ± 0.4, 1.7 ± 0.5, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 2.0 ± 0.5 cm2, and mean gradients were 7.0 ± 2.7, 7.5 ± 4.7, 7.3 ± 3.3, and 6.4 ± 3.3 mmHg for 23, 25, 27, and 29 mm valve sizes, respectively). Across all implanted valve sizes, most patients (77.1%) had no patient-prosthesis mismatch. Death from any cause within 1 year occurred in 13.7% of the patients in the first-generation DS group as compared with 11.0% in the second-generation DS group (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The Portico valve demonstrated excellent hemodynamic performance across all valve sizes in a large cohort of subjects implanted in experienced TAVI centers. One-year survival rates were favorable when using both the first-generation and second-generation (FlexNav) DSs in this high-risk cohort. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03752866.
Abbott Laboratories Santa Clara California USA
Cardiology Department Puerta de Hierro Hospital Madrid Spain
Cardiovascular Institute Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC Madrid Spain
Department of Cardiology Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen Nuremberg Erlangen Germany
Department of Cardiology Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast UK
Department of Cardiology St Johannes Hospital Dortmund Germany
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg Germany
Department of Medicine Cardiology University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Interventional Cardiology Unit IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato Milan Italy
Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre Bad Nauheim Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24006100
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240412130933.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240405s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100226 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38283573
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Möllmann, Helge $u Department of Cardiology, St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
- 245 10
- $a Valve Hemodynamics by Valve Size and 1-Year Survival Following Implantation of the Portico Valve in the Multicenter CONFIDENCE Registry / $c H. Möllmann, A. Linke, L. Nombela-Franco, M. Sluka, J. Francisco Oteo Dominguez, M. Montorfano, WK. Kim, M. Arnold, M. Vasa-Nicotera, S. Fichtlscherer, L. Conradi, A. Camuglia, F. Bedogni, K. Kohli, G. Manoharan
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The CONtrolled delivery For ImproveD outcomEs with cliNiCal Evidence registry was initiated to characterize the clinical safety and device performance from experienced transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centers in Europe and Australia that use the Portico valve to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis. We herein report for the first time the valve performance at 30-day across all implanted valve sizes and the 1-year survival from this registry. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational clinical investigation of patients clinically indicated for implantation of a Portico valve in experienced TAVI centers. Patients were treated with a commercially available valve (size 23, 25, 27, or 29 mm) using either the first-generation delivery system (DS) (n = 501) or the second-generation (FlexNav) DS (n = 500). Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Echocardiographic outcomes were assessed at 30 days by an independent core laboratory, and a survival check was performed at 1 year. RESULTS: We enrolled 1001 patients (82.0 years, 62.5% female, 63.7% New York Heart Association functional class III/IV at baseline) from 27 clinical sites in 8 countries across Europe and one site in Australia. Implantation of a single valve was successful in 97.5% of subjects. Valve hemodynamics at 30 days were substantially improved relative to baseline, with large aortic valve areas and low mean gradients across all implanted valve sizes (aortic valve areas were 1.7 ± 0.4, 1.7 ± 0.5, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 2.0 ± 0.5 cm2, and mean gradients were 7.0 ± 2.7, 7.5 ± 4.7, 7.3 ± 3.3, and 6.4 ± 3.3 mmHg for 23, 25, 27, and 29 mm valve sizes, respectively). Across all implanted valve sizes, most patients (77.1%) had no patient-prosthesis mismatch. Death from any cause within 1 year occurred in 13.7% of the patients in the first-generation DS group as compared with 11.0% in the second-generation DS group (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The Portico valve demonstrated excellent hemodynamic performance across all valve sizes in a large cohort of subjects implanted in experienced TAVI centers. One-year survival rates were favorable when using both the first-generation and second-generation (FlexNav) DSs in this high-risk cohort. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03752866.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Linke, Axel $u Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University Hospital of the Technical University of Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Nombela-Franco, Luis $u Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Sluka, Martin $u Department of Medicine-Cardiology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Francisco Oteo Dominguez, Juan $u Cardiology Department, Puerta de Hierro Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Montorfano, Matteo $u Interventional Cardiology Unit IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Kim, Won-Keun $u Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Arnold, Martin $u Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Fichtlscherer, Stephan $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Conradi, Lenard $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Camuglia, Anthony $u University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia $u The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- 700 1_
- $a Bedogni, Francesco $u IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Kohli, Keshav $u Abbott Laboratories, Santa Clara, California, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Manoharan, Ganesh $u Department of Cardiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
- 773 0_
- $w MED00211269 $t Structural heart $x 2474-8714 $g Roč. 8, č. 1 (2024), s. 100226
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38283573 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240412130925 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2076126 $s 1215862
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 8 $c 1 $d 100226 $e 20231111 $i 2474-8714 $m Structural heart $n Struct. heart $x MED00211269
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240405