• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Coronary Syndrome

B. Lattuca, C. Mazeau, G. Cayla, G. Ducrocq, P. Guedeney, M. Laredo, R. Dumaine, M. El Kasty, P. Kala, M. Nejjari, O. Hlinomaz, O. Morel, O. Varenne, F. Leclercq, L. Payot, C. Spaulding, F. Beygui, G. Rangé, Z. Motovska, JJ. Portal, E. Vicaut,...

. 2024 ; 17 (3) : 359-370. [pub] 20240212

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007151

BACKGROUND: Whether ticagrelor in chronic coronary syndrome patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can prevent cardiovascular events is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate outcomes of complex PCI and the efficacy of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in stable patients randomized in the ALPHEUS (Assessment of Loading with the P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor or clopidogrel to Halt ischemic Events in patients Undergoing elective coronary Stenting) trial. METHODS: All PCI procedures were blindly reviewed and classified as complex if they had at least 1 of the following criteria: stent length >60 mm, 2-stent bifurcation, left main, bypass graft, chronic total occlusion, use of atherectomy or guiding catheter extensions, multiwire technique, multiple stents. The primary endpoint was a composite of type 4a or b myocardial infarction (MI) and major myocardial injury during the 48 hours after PCI. We compared the event rates according to the presence or not of complex PCI criteria and evaluated the interaction with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. RESULTS: Among the 1,866 patients randomized, 910 PCI (48.3%) were classified as complex PCI. The primary endpoint was more frequent in complex PCI (45.6% vs 26.6%; P < 0.001) driven by higher rates of type 4 MI and angiographic complications (12.2% vs 4.8 %; P < 0.001 and 19.3% vs 8.6%; P < 0.05, respectively). The composite of death, MI, and stroke at 48 hours (12.7% vs 5.1 %; P < 0.05) and at 30 days (13.4% vs 5.3%; P < 0.05) was more frequent in complex PCI. No interaction was found between PCI complexity and the randomized treatment for the primary endpoint (Pinteraction = 0.47) nor the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic coronary syndrome, patients undergoing a complex PCI have higher rates of periprocedural and cardiovascular events that are not reduced by ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel.

ACTION Study Group Unité de Recherche Clinique Hôpital Fernand Widal EA 4543 Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne Paris Paris France

Cardiocenter 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Cardiology Department Caen University Hospital ACTION Study Group Caen France

Cardiology Department Centre Cardiologique du Nord Paris France

Cardiology Department Chartres Hospital Chartres France

Cardiology Department General Hospital Yves Le Foll Saint Brieuc France

Cardiology Department Nîmes University Hospital Montpellier University ACTION Study Group Nîmes France

Cardiology Department Université de Paris Hôpital Bichat AP HP French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials INSERM U1148 Paris France

Département de Cardiologie Grand Hôpital de l'Est Francilien site Marne La Vallée Marne la Vallée France

Department of Cardiology Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital Montpellier University Montpellier France

Department of Cardiology Cochin Hospital Hôpitaux Universitaire Paris Centre Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France

Department of Cardiology European Hospital Georges Pompidou Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Paris Cité University Sudden Cardiac Death Expert Center INSERM U 971 PARCC Paris France

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Nouvel Hôpital Civil Strasbourg University Hospital Strasbourg France

Les Grands Prés Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre Villeneuve St Denis France

Sorbonne Université ACTION Study Group INSERM UMRS1166 Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Paris France

University Hospital Brno Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007151
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155743.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.12.011 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38355265
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lattuca, Benoit $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; Cardiology Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, ACTION Study Group, Nîmes, France
245    10
$a Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Coronary Syndrome / $c B. Lattuca, C. Mazeau, G. Cayla, G. Ducrocq, P. Guedeney, M. Laredo, R. Dumaine, M. El Kasty, P. Kala, M. Nejjari, O. Hlinomaz, O. Morel, O. Varenne, F. Leclercq, L. Payot, C. Spaulding, F. Beygui, G. Rangé, Z. Motovska, JJ. Portal, E. Vicaut, JP. Collet, G. Montalescot, J. Silvain, ALPHEUS Investigators
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Whether ticagrelor in chronic coronary syndrome patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can prevent cardiovascular events is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate outcomes of complex PCI and the efficacy of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in stable patients randomized in the ALPHEUS (Assessment of Loading with the P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor or clopidogrel to Halt ischemic Events in patients Undergoing elective coronary Stenting) trial. METHODS: All PCI procedures were blindly reviewed and classified as complex if they had at least 1 of the following criteria: stent length >60 mm, 2-stent bifurcation, left main, bypass graft, chronic total occlusion, use of atherectomy or guiding catheter extensions, multiwire technique, multiple stents. The primary endpoint was a composite of type 4a or b myocardial infarction (MI) and major myocardial injury during the 48 hours after PCI. We compared the event rates according to the presence or not of complex PCI criteria and evaluated the interaction with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. RESULTS: Among the 1,866 patients randomized, 910 PCI (48.3%) were classified as complex PCI. The primary endpoint was more frequent in complex PCI (45.6% vs 26.6%; P < 0.001) driven by higher rates of type 4 MI and angiographic complications (12.2% vs 4.8 %; P < 0.001 and 19.3% vs 8.6%; P < 0.05, respectively). The composite of death, MI, and stroke at 48 hours (12.7% vs 5.1 %; P < 0.05) and at 30 days (13.4% vs 5.3%; P < 0.05) was more frequent in complex PCI. No interaction was found between PCI complexity and the randomized treatment for the primary endpoint (Pinteraction = 0.47) nor the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic coronary syndrome, patients undergoing a complex PCI have higher rates of periprocedural and cardiovascular events that are not reduced by ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a akutní koronární syndrom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $x komplikace $7 D054058
650    _2
$a klopidogrel $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077144
650    12
$a infarkt myokardu $x etiologie $7 D009203
650    12
$a koronární angioplastika $x škodlivé účinky $7 D062645
650    _2
$a inhibitory agregace trombocytů $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D010975
650    _2
$a ticagrelor $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077486
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mazeau, Cedric $u Cardiology Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, ACTION Study Group, Nîmes, France
700    1_
$a Cayla, Guillaume $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; Cardiology Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, ACTION Study Group, Nîmes, France
700    1_
$a Ducrocq, Grégory $u Cardiology Department, Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials (FACT), INSERM U1148, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Guedeney, Paul $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
700    1_
$a Laredo, Mikael $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
700    1_
$a Dumaine, Raphaëlle $u Les Grands Prés Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre, Villeneuve St Denis, France
700    1_
$a El Kasty, Mohamad $u Département de Cardiologie, Grand Hôpital de l'Est Francilien site Marne-La-Vallée, Marne-la-Vallée, France
700    1_
$a Kala, Petr $u University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nejjari, Mohammed $u Cardiology Department, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Hlinomaz, Ota $u University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Morel, Olivier $u Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
700    1_
$a Varenne, Olivier $u Department of Cardiology, Cochin Hospital, Hôpitaux Universitaire Paris Centre, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Leclercq, Florence $u Department of Cardiology, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
700    1_
$a Payot, Laurent $u Cardiology Department, General Hospital Yves Le Foll, Saint-Brieuc, France
700    1_
$a Spaulding, Christian $u Department of Cardiology, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Cité University, Sudden Cardiac Death Expert Center, INSERM U 971, PARCC, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Beygui, Farzin $u Cardiology Department, Caen University Hospital, ACTION Study Group, Caen, France
700    1_
$a Rangé, Grégoire $u Cardiology Department, Chartres Hospital, Chartres, France
700    1_
$a Motovska, Zuzana $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Portal, Jean-Jacques $u ACTION Study Group, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Fernand Widal (AP-HP), EA 4543, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne Paris, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Vicaut, Eric $u ACTION Study Group, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Fernand Widal (AP-HP), EA 4543, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne Paris, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Collet, Jean-Philippe $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
700    1_
$a Montalescot, Gilles $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France. Electronic address: gilles.montalescot@aphp.fr
700    1_
$a Silvain, Johanne $u Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
710    2_
$a ALPHEUS Investigators
773    0_
$w MED00186218 $t JACC. Cardiovascular interventions $x 1876-7605 $g Roč. 17, č. 3 (2024), s. 359-370
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38355265 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155740 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081254 $s 1216918
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 17 $c 3 $d 359-370 $e 20240212 $i 1876-7605 $m JACC. Cardiovascular interventions $n JACC Cardiovasc Interv $x MED00186218
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...