• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

International expert consensus on the surgical anatomic classification of radical hysterectomies

D. Querleu, D. Cibula, NR. Abu-Rustum, F. Fanfani, A. Fagotti, L. Pedone Anchora, MM. Ianieri, V. Chiantera, N. Bizzarri, G. Scambia

. 2024 ; 230 (2) : 235.e1-235.e8. [pub] 20231001

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007439

BACKGROUND: The anatomic descriptions and extents of radical hysterectomy often vary across the literature and operative reports worldwide. The same nomenclature is often used to describe varying procedures, and different nomenclature is often used to describe the same procedure despite the availability of guideline and classification systems. This makes it difficult to interpret retrospective surgical reports, analyze surgical databases, understand technique descriptions, and interpret the findings of surgical studies. OBJECTIVE: In collaboration with international experts in gynecologic oncology, the purpose of this study was to establish a consensus in defining and interpreting the 2017 updated Querleu-Morrow classification of radical hysterectomies. STUDY DESIGN: The anatomic templates of type A, B, and C radical hysterectomy were documented through a set of 13 images taken at the time of cadaver dissection. An online survey related to radical hysterectomy nomenclature and definitions or descriptions of the associated procedures was circulated among international experts in radical hysterectomy. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Image legends were amended according to the experts' responses and then redistributed as part of a second round of the survey. Consensus was defined by a yes response to a question concerning a specific image. Anyone who responded no to a question was welcome to comment and provide justification. A final set of images and legends were compiled to anatomically illustrate and define or describe a lateral, ventral, and dorsal excision of the tissues surrounding the cervix. RESULTS: In total, there were 13 questions to review, and 29 experts completed the whole process. Final consensus exceeded 90% for all questions except 1 (86%). Questions with relatively lower consensus rates concerned the definitions of types A and B2 radical hysterectomy, which were the main innovations of the 2017 updated version of the 2008 Querleu-Morrow classification. Questions with the highest consensus rates concerned the definitions of types B1 and C, which are the most frequently performed radical hysterectomies. CONCLUSION: The 2017 version of the Querleu-Morrow classification proved to be a robust tool for defining and describing the extent of radical hysterectomies with a high level of consensus among international experts in gynecologic oncology. Knowledge and implementation of the exact definitions of hysterectomy radicality are imperative in clinical practice and clinical research.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007439
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155947.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.099 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37788719
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Querleu, Denis $u UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: denis.querleu@esgo.org
245    10
$a International expert consensus on the surgical anatomic classification of radical hysterectomies / $c D. Querleu, D. Cibula, NR. Abu-Rustum, F. Fanfani, A. Fagotti, L. Pedone Anchora, MM. Ianieri, V. Chiantera, N. Bizzarri, G. Scambia
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The anatomic descriptions and extents of radical hysterectomy often vary across the literature and operative reports worldwide. The same nomenclature is often used to describe varying procedures, and different nomenclature is often used to describe the same procedure despite the availability of guideline and classification systems. This makes it difficult to interpret retrospective surgical reports, analyze surgical databases, understand technique descriptions, and interpret the findings of surgical studies. OBJECTIVE: In collaboration with international experts in gynecologic oncology, the purpose of this study was to establish a consensus in defining and interpreting the 2017 updated Querleu-Morrow classification of radical hysterectomies. STUDY DESIGN: The anatomic templates of type A, B, and C radical hysterectomy were documented through a set of 13 images taken at the time of cadaver dissection. An online survey related to radical hysterectomy nomenclature and definitions or descriptions of the associated procedures was circulated among international experts in radical hysterectomy. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Image legends were amended according to the experts' responses and then redistributed as part of a second round of the survey. Consensus was defined by a yes response to a question concerning a specific image. Anyone who responded no to a question was welcome to comment and provide justification. A final set of images and legends were compiled to anatomically illustrate and define or describe a lateral, ventral, and dorsal excision of the tissues surrounding the cervix. RESULTS: In total, there were 13 questions to review, and 29 experts completed the whole process. Final consensus exceeded 90% for all questions except 1 (86%). Questions with relatively lower consensus rates concerned the definitions of types A and B2 radical hysterectomy, which were the main innovations of the 2017 updated version of the 2008 Querleu-Morrow classification. Questions with the highest consensus rates concerned the definitions of types B1 and C, which are the most frequently performed radical hysterectomies. CONCLUSION: The 2017 version of the Querleu-Morrow classification proved to be a robust tool for defining and describing the extent of radical hysterectomies with a high level of consensus among international experts in gynecologic oncology. Knowledge and implementation of the exact definitions of hysterectomy radicality are imperative in clinical practice and clinical research.
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a nádory ženských pohlavních orgánů $7 D005833
650    _2
$a konsensus $7 D032921
650    _2
$a hysterektomie $x metody $7 D007044
650    _2
$a cervix uteri $7 D002584
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cibula, David $u Charles University and General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R $u Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
700    1_
$a Fanfani, Francesco $u UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Fagotti, Anna $u UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Pedone Anchora, Luigi $u UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Ianieri, Manuel Maria $u UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Chiantera, Vito $u Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
700    1_
$a Bizzarri, Nicolò $u UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Scambia, Giovanni $u UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
773    0_
$w MED00000270 $t American journal of obstetrics and gynecology $x 1097-6868 $g Roč. 230, č. 2 (2024), s. 235.e1-235.e8
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37788719 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155944 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081430 $s 1217206
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 230 $c 2 $d 235.e1-235.e8 $e 20231001 $i 1097-6868 $m American journal of obstetrics and gynecology $n Am J Obstet Gynecol $x MED00000270
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...