• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption

A. Repici, K. Khalaf, E. Troncone, S. Subramaniam, C. Hassan, P. Bhandari, DISPOSE Group

. 2024 ; 56 (2) : 322-329. [pub] 20230807

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24007451

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Increasing infectious rate estimates and low microbiological surveillance affect safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy globally. Single use endoscopes and accessories have been claimed to improve safety, but there is lack of data on their indication and sustainability. We aimed to identify a series of best practice recommendations for the use of single use endoscopes and accessories using a modified Delphi. METHODS/DESIGN: Consensus statements for the use of single use endoscopy and accessories were developed using a modified Delphi process, utilizing an international endoscopist expert panel of 62 experts from 33 nations. The main steps in the process were selecting the consensus group, conducting systematic literature reviews, developing statements, and anonymous voting on the statements until consensus was reached. High-risk patients were defined as those with multi-drug-resistant infections, immunosuppressive medication or chemotherapy, post-transplantation, or with severe neutropenia. RESULTS: Of the 26 statements that were voted upon through two rounds, 17 statements reached consensus. Category 1: single use accessories (8 statements), related to defining recommendations for the use of single use accessories in all patient populations or high-risk patients. Category 2: clinical indication for single use endoscopes (9 statements), including indications to high-risk patients, protecting the endoscope apparatus and contamination measures in endoscopy units. Category 3: technical factors (4 statements), related to superior performance and technical specifications with the new innovation. Category 4: environmental issues (2 statements), concerning mechanisms that reduce the detrimental burden to the environment. Category 5: financial implications (3 statements), related to healthcare policies, cost neutrality and other financial associations of single use endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international initiative in determining clinical indications for single use endoscopy and accessories. The study's findings should serve as a framework for future physicians to guide future research and aid the proper evidence-based indications for the implementation of single use endoscopes in clinical practice.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24007451
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155955.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.026 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37558571
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Repici, Alessandro $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
245    10
$a International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption / $c A. Repici, K. Khalaf, E. Troncone, S. Subramaniam, C. Hassan, P. Bhandari, DISPOSE Group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Increasing infectious rate estimates and low microbiological surveillance affect safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy globally. Single use endoscopes and accessories have been claimed to improve safety, but there is lack of data on their indication and sustainability. We aimed to identify a series of best practice recommendations for the use of single use endoscopes and accessories using a modified Delphi. METHODS/DESIGN: Consensus statements for the use of single use endoscopy and accessories were developed using a modified Delphi process, utilizing an international endoscopist expert panel of 62 experts from 33 nations. The main steps in the process were selecting the consensus group, conducting systematic literature reviews, developing statements, and anonymous voting on the statements until consensus was reached. High-risk patients were defined as those with multi-drug-resistant infections, immunosuppressive medication or chemotherapy, post-transplantation, or with severe neutropenia. RESULTS: Of the 26 statements that were voted upon through two rounds, 17 statements reached consensus. Category 1: single use accessories (8 statements), related to defining recommendations for the use of single use accessories in all patient populations or high-risk patients. Category 2: clinical indication for single use endoscopes (9 statements), including indications to high-risk patients, protecting the endoscope apparatus and contamination measures in endoscopy units. Category 3: technical factors (4 statements), related to superior performance and technical specifications with the new innovation. Category 4: environmental issues (2 statements), concerning mechanisms that reduce the detrimental burden to the environment. Category 5: financial implications (3 statements), related to healthcare policies, cost neutrality and other financial associations of single use endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international initiative in determining clinical indications for single use endoscopy and accessories. The study's findings should serve as a framework for future physicians to guide future research and aid the proper evidence-based indications for the implementation of single use endoscopes in clinical practice.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a delfská metoda $7 D003697
650    12
$a gastrointestinální endoskopie $7 D016099
650    _2
$a konsensus $7 D032921
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Khalaf, Kareem $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: kareem.khalaf@mail.utoronto.ca
700    1_
$a Troncone, Edoardo $u Department of Systems Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Subramaniam, Sharmila $u Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
700    1_
$a Hassan, Cesare $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
700    1_
$a Bhandari, Pradeep $u Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK; School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
710    2_
$a DISPOSE Group
773    0_
$w MED00166709 $t Digestive and liver disease $x 1878-3562 $g Roč. 56, č. 2 (2024), s. 322-329
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37558571 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155951 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2081441 $s 1217218
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 56 $c 2 $d 322-329 $e 20230807 $i 1878-3562 $m Digestive and liver disease $n Dig. Liver Dis. $x MED00166709
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...