-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption
A. Repici, K. Khalaf, E. Troncone, S. Subramaniam, C. Hassan, P. Bhandari, DISPOSE Group
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- gastrointestinální endoskopie * MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Increasing infectious rate estimates and low microbiological surveillance affect safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy globally. Single use endoscopes and accessories have been claimed to improve safety, but there is lack of data on their indication and sustainability. We aimed to identify a series of best practice recommendations for the use of single use endoscopes and accessories using a modified Delphi. METHODS/DESIGN: Consensus statements for the use of single use endoscopy and accessories were developed using a modified Delphi process, utilizing an international endoscopist expert panel of 62 experts from 33 nations. The main steps in the process were selecting the consensus group, conducting systematic literature reviews, developing statements, and anonymous voting on the statements until consensus was reached. High-risk patients were defined as those with multi-drug-resistant infections, immunosuppressive medication or chemotherapy, post-transplantation, or with severe neutropenia. RESULTS: Of the 26 statements that were voted upon through two rounds, 17 statements reached consensus. Category 1: single use accessories (8 statements), related to defining recommendations for the use of single use accessories in all patient populations or high-risk patients. Category 2: clinical indication for single use endoscopes (9 statements), including indications to high-risk patients, protecting the endoscope apparatus and contamination measures in endoscopy units. Category 3: technical factors (4 statements), related to superior performance and technical specifications with the new innovation. Category 4: environmental issues (2 statements), concerning mechanisms that reduce the detrimental burden to the environment. Category 5: financial implications (3 statements), related to healthcare policies, cost neutrality and other financial associations of single use endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international initiative in determining clinical indications for single use endoscopy and accessories. The study's findings should serve as a framework for future physicians to guide future research and aid the proper evidence-based indications for the implementation of single use endoscopes in clinical practice.
Department of Biomedical Sciences Pieve Emanuele Humanitas University Rozzano Italy
Department of Gastroenterology Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust Portsmouth UK
Department of Systems Medicine Gastroenterology Unit University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome Italy
Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre IRCCS Endoscopy Unit Rozzano Italy
School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences University of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007451
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423155955.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.026 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37558571
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Repici, Alessandro $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
- 245 10
- $a International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption / $c A. Repici, K. Khalaf, E. Troncone, S. Subramaniam, C. Hassan, P. Bhandari, DISPOSE Group
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Increasing infectious rate estimates and low microbiological surveillance affect safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy globally. Single use endoscopes and accessories have been claimed to improve safety, but there is lack of data on their indication and sustainability. We aimed to identify a series of best practice recommendations for the use of single use endoscopes and accessories using a modified Delphi. METHODS/DESIGN: Consensus statements for the use of single use endoscopy and accessories were developed using a modified Delphi process, utilizing an international endoscopist expert panel of 62 experts from 33 nations. The main steps in the process were selecting the consensus group, conducting systematic literature reviews, developing statements, and anonymous voting on the statements until consensus was reached. High-risk patients were defined as those with multi-drug-resistant infections, immunosuppressive medication or chemotherapy, post-transplantation, or with severe neutropenia. RESULTS: Of the 26 statements that were voted upon through two rounds, 17 statements reached consensus. Category 1: single use accessories (8 statements), related to defining recommendations for the use of single use accessories in all patient populations or high-risk patients. Category 2: clinical indication for single use endoscopes (9 statements), including indications to high-risk patients, protecting the endoscope apparatus and contamination measures in endoscopy units. Category 3: technical factors (4 statements), related to superior performance and technical specifications with the new innovation. Category 4: environmental issues (2 statements), concerning mechanisms that reduce the detrimental burden to the environment. Category 5: financial implications (3 statements), related to healthcare policies, cost neutrality and other financial associations of single use endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international initiative in determining clinical indications for single use endoscopy and accessories. The study's findings should serve as a framework for future physicians to guide future research and aid the proper evidence-based indications for the implementation of single use endoscopes in clinical practice.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a delfská metoda $7 D003697
- 650 12
- $a gastrointestinální endoskopie $7 D016099
- 650 _2
- $a konsensus $7 D032921
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Khalaf, Kareem $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: kareem.khalaf@mail.utoronto.ca
- 700 1_
- $a Troncone, Edoardo $u Department of Systems Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Subramaniam, Sharmila $u Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Hassan, Cesare $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Bhandari, Pradeep $u Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK; School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
- 710 2_
- $a DISPOSE Group
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166709 $t Digestive and liver disease $x 1878-3562 $g Roč. 56, č. 2 (2024), s. 322-329
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37558571 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423155951 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081441 $s 1217218
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 56 $c 2 $d 322-329 $e 20230807 $i 1878-3562 $m Digestive and liver disease $n Dig. Liver Dis. $x MED00166709
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412