Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Enhancing Accuracy in Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: A Multicentric, Multi-Reader Study

M. Biroš, D. Kvak, J. Dandár, R. Hrubý, E. Janů, A. Atakhanova, MA. Al-Antari

. 2024 ; 14 (11) : . [pub] 20240528

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
X001 Carebot, Ltd.

The evaluation of mammographic breast density, a critical indicator of breast cancer risk, is traditionally performed by radiologists via visual inspection of mammography images, utilizing the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories. However, this method is subject to substantial interobserver variability, leading to inconsistencies and potential inaccuracies in density assessment and subsequent risk estimations. To address this, we present a deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm (DLAD) designed for the automated evaluation of breast density. Our multicentric, multi-reader study leverages a diverse dataset of 122 full-field digital mammography studies (488 images in CC and MLO projections) sourced from three institutions. We invited two experienced radiologists to conduct a retrospective analysis, establishing a ground truth for 72 mammography studies (BI-RADS class A: 18, BI-RADS class B: 43, BI-RADS class C: 7, BI-RADS class D: 4). The efficacy of the DLAD was then compared to the performance of five independent radiologists with varying levels of experience. The DLAD showed robust performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.736-0.903), along with an F1 score of 0.798 (0.594-0.905), precision of 0.806 (0.596-0.896), recall of 0.830 (0.650-0.946), and a Cohen's Kappa (κ) of 0.708 (0.562-0.841). The algorithm achieved robust performance that matches and in four cases exceeds that of individual radiologists. The statistical analysis did not reveal a significant difference in accuracy between DLAD and the radiologists, underscoring the model's competitive diagnostic alignment with professional radiologist assessments. These results demonstrate that the deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm can enhance the accuracy and consistency of breast density assessments, offering a reliable tool for improving breast cancer screening outcomes.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24012690
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240726151343.0
007      
ta
008      
240723s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/diagnostics14111117 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38893643
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Biroš, Marek $u Carebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000032781623X
245    10
$a Enhancing Accuracy in Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: A Multicentric, Multi-Reader Study / $c M. Biroš, D. Kvak, J. Dandár, R. Hrubý, E. Janů, A. Atakhanova, MA. Al-Antari
520    9_
$a The evaluation of mammographic breast density, a critical indicator of breast cancer risk, is traditionally performed by radiologists via visual inspection of mammography images, utilizing the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories. However, this method is subject to substantial interobserver variability, leading to inconsistencies and potential inaccuracies in density assessment and subsequent risk estimations. To address this, we present a deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm (DLAD) designed for the automated evaluation of breast density. Our multicentric, multi-reader study leverages a diverse dataset of 122 full-field digital mammography studies (488 images in CC and MLO projections) sourced from three institutions. We invited two experienced radiologists to conduct a retrospective analysis, establishing a ground truth for 72 mammography studies (BI-RADS class A: 18, BI-RADS class B: 43, BI-RADS class C: 7, BI-RADS class D: 4). The efficacy of the DLAD was then compared to the performance of five independent radiologists with varying levels of experience. The DLAD showed robust performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.736-0.903), along with an F1 score of 0.798 (0.594-0.905), precision of 0.806 (0.596-0.896), recall of 0.830 (0.650-0.946), and a Cohen's Kappa (κ) of 0.708 (0.562-0.841). The algorithm achieved robust performance that matches and in four cases exceeds that of individual radiologists. The statistical analysis did not reveal a significant difference in accuracy between DLAD and the radiologists, underscoring the model's competitive diagnostic alignment with professional radiologist assessments. These results demonstrate that the deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm can enhance the accuracy and consistency of breast density assessments, offering a reliable tool for improving breast cancer screening outcomes.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kvak, Daniel $u Carebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000178087773
700    1_
$a Dandár, Jakub $u Carebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hrubý, Robert $u Carebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000299858060
700    1_
$a Janů, Eva $u Department of Radiology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000020147211X
700    1_
$a Atakhanova, Anora $u Carebot, Ltd., 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Al-Antari, Mugahed A $u Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Daeyang AI Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea $1 https://orcid.org/0000000244574407
773    0_
$w MED00195450 $t Diagnostics $x 2075-4418 $g Roč. 14, č. 11 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38893643 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240723 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240726151335 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2125447 $s 1224553
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 14 $c 11 $e 20240528 $i 2075-4418 $m Diagnostics $n Diagnostics (Basel) $x MED00195450
GRA    __
$a X001 $p Carebot, Ltd.
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240723

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...