Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Electromechanical efficiency index of skeletal muscle and its applicability: a systematic review

G. Turnsek, AH. Paravlic

. 2024 ; 12 (-) : 1398047. [pub] 20240509

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24012830

Introduction: The electromechanical efficiency of skeletal muscle represents the dissociation between electrical and mechanical events within a muscle. It has been widely studied, with varying methods for its measurement and calculation. For this reason, the purpose of this literature review was to integrate the available research to date and provide more insights about this measure. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed across three online databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SPORTDiscus. This yielded 1284 reports, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies have used different methods to measure the electromechanical efficiency (EME) index, including electromyography (EMG), mechanomyography and tensiomyography (TMG). Results: The EME index was used to assess muscle conditions such as muscle atrophy, pain syndromes, or to monitor rehabilitation in patients with knee problems, fatigue and the effects of exercise and rehabilitation. TMG has been shown to be one of the most reliable methods to obtain the EME index, but its use precludes obtaining the index during voluntary muscle contractions. Conclusion: Standardizing the EME index is crucial for its diverse applications in clinical, sport, and rehabilitation contexts. Future research should prioritize standardization of measurement protocols for establishing the most repeatable, and reliable approach that can be used for inter-individual comparisons or for assessing an individual for multiple times over a longer period. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023440333 Identifier: CRD42023440333.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24012830
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240726151425.0
007      
ta
008      
240723e20240509sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1398047 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38784764
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Turnsek, Gasper $u Institute of Kinesiology, Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
245    10
$a Electromechanical efficiency index of skeletal muscle and its applicability: a systematic review / $c G. Turnsek, AH. Paravlic
520    9_
$a Introduction: The electromechanical efficiency of skeletal muscle represents the dissociation between electrical and mechanical events within a muscle. It has been widely studied, with varying methods for its measurement and calculation. For this reason, the purpose of this literature review was to integrate the available research to date and provide more insights about this measure. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed across three online databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SPORTDiscus. This yielded 1284 reports, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies have used different methods to measure the electromechanical efficiency (EME) index, including electromyography (EMG), mechanomyography and tensiomyography (TMG). Results: The EME index was used to assess muscle conditions such as muscle atrophy, pain syndromes, or to monitor rehabilitation in patients with knee problems, fatigue and the effects of exercise and rehabilitation. TMG has been shown to be one of the most reliable methods to obtain the EME index, but its use precludes obtaining the index during voluntary muscle contractions. Conclusion: Standardizing the EME index is crucial for its diverse applications in clinical, sport, and rehabilitation contexts. Future research should prioritize standardization of measurement protocols for establishing the most repeatable, and reliable approach that can be used for inter-individual comparisons or for assessing an individual for multiple times over a longer period. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023440333 Identifier: CRD42023440333.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Paravlic, Armin Huso $u Institute of Kinesiology, Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia $u Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia $u Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00188064 $t Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $x 2296-4185 $g Roč. 12 (20240509), s. 1398047
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38784764 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240723 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240726151418 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2125489 $s 1224693
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 12 $c - $d 1398047 $e 20240509 $i 2296-4185 $m Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $n Front Bioeng Biotechnol $x MED00188064
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240723

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...