-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Electromechanical efficiency index of skeletal muscle and its applicability: a systematic review
G. Turnsek, AH. Paravlic
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu systematický přehled
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2013
Free Medical Journals
od 2013
PubMed Central
od 2013
Europe PubMed Central
od 2013
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2013
- Publikační typ
- systematický přehled MeSH
Introduction: The electromechanical efficiency of skeletal muscle represents the dissociation between electrical and mechanical events within a muscle. It has been widely studied, with varying methods for its measurement and calculation. For this reason, the purpose of this literature review was to integrate the available research to date and provide more insights about this measure. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed across three online databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SPORTDiscus. This yielded 1284 reports, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies have used different methods to measure the electromechanical efficiency (EME) index, including electromyography (EMG), mechanomyography and tensiomyography (TMG). Results: The EME index was used to assess muscle conditions such as muscle atrophy, pain syndromes, or to monitor rehabilitation in patients with knee problems, fatigue and the effects of exercise and rehabilitation. TMG has been shown to be one of the most reliable methods to obtain the EME index, but its use precludes obtaining the index during voluntary muscle contractions. Conclusion: Standardizing the EME index is crucial for its diverse applications in clinical, sport, and rehabilitation contexts. Future research should prioritize standardization of measurement protocols for establishing the most repeatable, and reliable approach that can be used for inter-individual comparisons or for assessing an individual for multiple times over a longer period. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023440333 Identifier: CRD42023440333.
Faculty of Sports Studies Masaryk University Brno Czechia
Institute of Kinesiology Faculty of Sport University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Science and Research Centre Koper Institute for Kinesiology Research Koper Slovenia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24012830
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240726151425.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240723e20240509sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1398047 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38784764
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Turnsek, Gasper $u Institute of Kinesiology, Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 245 10
- $a Electromechanical efficiency index of skeletal muscle and its applicability: a systematic review / $c G. Turnsek, AH. Paravlic
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction: The electromechanical efficiency of skeletal muscle represents the dissociation between electrical and mechanical events within a muscle. It has been widely studied, with varying methods for its measurement and calculation. For this reason, the purpose of this literature review was to integrate the available research to date and provide more insights about this measure. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed across three online databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SPORTDiscus. This yielded 1284 reports, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies have used different methods to measure the electromechanical efficiency (EME) index, including electromyography (EMG), mechanomyography and tensiomyography (TMG). Results: The EME index was used to assess muscle conditions such as muscle atrophy, pain syndromes, or to monitor rehabilitation in patients with knee problems, fatigue and the effects of exercise and rehabilitation. TMG has been shown to be one of the most reliable methods to obtain the EME index, but its use precludes obtaining the index during voluntary muscle contractions. Conclusion: Standardizing the EME index is crucial for its diverse applications in clinical, sport, and rehabilitation contexts. Future research should prioritize standardization of measurement protocols for establishing the most repeatable, and reliable approach that can be used for inter-individual comparisons or for assessing an individual for multiple times over a longer period. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023440333 Identifier: CRD42023440333.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Paravlic, Armin Huso $u Institute of Kinesiology, Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia $u Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia $u Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188064 $t Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $x 2296-4185 $g Roč. 12 (20240509), s. 1398047
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38784764 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240723 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240726151418 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2125489 $s 1224693
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 12 $c - $d 1398047 $e 20240509 $i 2296-4185 $m Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $n Front Bioeng Biotechnol $x MED00188064
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240723