-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Rationale and design of the ELEANOR trial early aortic valve surgery versus watchful waiting strategy in severe asymptomatic aortic regurgitation, ACRONYM: ELEANOR
R. Kočková, J. Vojáček, H. Bedáňová, P. Fila, I. Skalský, D. Žáková, M. Klán, B. Míková, K. Mědílek, M. Tuna, M. Fialová, R. Dvořáková, Z. Hlubocká, R. Panovský, K. Slabý, E. Kelen de Oliveira, F. Casselman, M. Pěnička
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2015
Free Medical Journals
od 2015
PubMed Central
od 2015
Europe PubMed Central
od 2015
Open Access Digital Library
od 2015-09-01
Elsevier Open Access Journals
od 2015-09-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2015
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of patients with severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) is state-of-the-art surgery. Asymptomatic patients with advanced left ventricular (LV) dilatation and/or impaired ejection fraction should undergo surgical treatment, but there is no guidelines consensus on cut-off values for this recommendation. Multimodality imaging has brought new tools for the accurate selection of asymptomatic patients at risk of early clinical deterioration, however, prospective and randomized data are pending. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived AR quantification along with LV remodeling assessment appears to be the most accurate tool for a selection of such patients at risk. TRIAL DESIGN: The objective of our prospective and multicenter study is to determine whether patients at risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment will benefit from early surgical treatment. The study is designed as a superiority trial to demonstrate that early surgical treatment is safe and more effective than the standard treatment. A total of 217 asymptomatic patients with severe AR, but without current guidelines-based surgical indication, will be enrolled across all centers. We expect 24 % of patients identified as high clinical risk and therefore eligible for 1:1 randomization to early surgical treatment within 3 months or a watchful waiting strategy. Follow-up will be annual. We expect a complete restoration of LV size and function along with improved quality of life and physical performance in a short-term follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint will be a composite safety and efficacy with all criteria mandatory: 15 % or larger reduction of baseline CMR-derived LV end-diastolic volume index, LV ejection fraction >50 %, and no major adverse cardiovascular events. The annual follow-up will continue for a minimum of 4 years until the required number of endpoints is achieved to show a statistically significant difference in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in early surgically treated patients. CONCLUSION: The ELEANOR trial is the first multicenter randomized controlled study to compare early surgical treatment with a watchful waiting strategy in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe AR at high risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment but without guidelines-based indications for surgical treatment.
CardioPaTh PhD Program Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences Federico 2 University Naples Italy
Cardiovascular Center OLV Clinic Aalst Belgium
Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation Brno Czech Republic
Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
University Hospital Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24012895
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240726151437.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240723s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29470 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38638969
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kočková, Radka $u Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Rationale and design of the ELEANOR trial early aortic valve surgery versus watchful waiting strategy in severe asymptomatic aortic regurgitation, ACRONYM: ELEANOR / $c R. Kočková, J. Vojáček, H. Bedáňová, P. Fila, I. Skalský, D. Žáková, M. Klán, B. Míková, K. Mědílek, M. Tuna, M. Fialová, R. Dvořáková, Z. Hlubocká, R. Panovský, K. Slabý, E. Kelen de Oliveira, F. Casselman, M. Pěnička
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of patients with severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) is state-of-the-art surgery. Asymptomatic patients with advanced left ventricular (LV) dilatation and/or impaired ejection fraction should undergo surgical treatment, but there is no guidelines consensus on cut-off values for this recommendation. Multimodality imaging has brought new tools for the accurate selection of asymptomatic patients at risk of early clinical deterioration, however, prospective and randomized data are pending. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived AR quantification along with LV remodeling assessment appears to be the most accurate tool for a selection of such patients at risk. TRIAL DESIGN: The objective of our prospective and multicenter study is to determine whether patients at risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment will benefit from early surgical treatment. The study is designed as a superiority trial to demonstrate that early surgical treatment is safe and more effective than the standard treatment. A total of 217 asymptomatic patients with severe AR, but without current guidelines-based surgical indication, will be enrolled across all centers. We expect 24 % of patients identified as high clinical risk and therefore eligible for 1:1 randomization to early surgical treatment within 3 months or a watchful waiting strategy. Follow-up will be annual. We expect a complete restoration of LV size and function along with improved quality of life and physical performance in a short-term follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint will be a composite safety and efficacy with all criteria mandatory: 15 % or larger reduction of baseline CMR-derived LV end-diastolic volume index, LV ejection fraction >50 %, and no major adverse cardiovascular events. The annual follow-up will continue for a minimum of 4 years until the required number of endpoints is achieved to show a statistically significant difference in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in early surgically treated patients. CONCLUSION: The ELEANOR trial is the first multicenter randomized controlled study to compare early surgical treatment with a watchful waiting strategy in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe AR at high risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment but without guidelines-based indications for surgical treatment.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vojáček, Jan $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bedáňová, Helena $u Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fila, Petr $u Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Skalský, Ivo $u Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Žáková, Daniela $u Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Klán, Michal $u Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Míková, Barbora $u Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mědílek, Karel $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tuna, Martin $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fialová, Monika $u University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dvořáková, Radka $u University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hlubocká, Zuzana $u 2nd Department of Internal Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Panovský, Roman $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u 1st Department of Internal, Brno, Czech Republic Medicine/Cardioangiology at St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Slabý, Kryštof $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kelen de Oliveira, Elayne $u CardioPaTh PhD Program, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy $u Cardiovascular Center OLV Clinic Aalst, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Casselman, Filip $u Cardiovascular Center OLV Clinic Aalst, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Pěnička, Martin $u Cardiovascular Center OLV Clinic Aalst, Belgium
- 773 0_
- $w MED00190064 $t Heliyon $x 2405-8440 $g Roč. 10, č. 8 (2024), s. e29470
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38638969 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240723 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240726151429 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2125511 $s 1224758
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 10 $c 8 $d e29470 $e 20240409 $i 2405-8440 $m Heliyon $n Heliyon $x MED00190064
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240723