• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ineffectiveness of hemoadsorption in large animals with abdominal sepsis: a randomized controlled porcine study

V. Tegl, J. Horak, L. Nalos, M. Horakova, M. Stengl, M. Matejovic, J. Benes

. 2024 ; 12 (1) : 38. [pub] 20240418

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24012984

Grantová podpora
COOPERACIO Lékařská Fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787 Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy

OBJECTIVES: The use of hemoadsorption (HA) has become popular in the treatment of vasoplegic states associated with massive cytokine release, including septic shock. However, this approach does not seem to be based on robust evidence, and it does not follow international guidelines. To understand the pathophysiological rationale and timing of HA, we conducted a large animal septic shock experiment. DESIGN: Prospective randomized large-animal peritoneal septic shock experiment. SETTING: Laboratory investigation. SUBJECTS: Twenty-six anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs randomly assigned into (1) sham-operated group with HA (SHAM, n = 5); (2) sepsis animals without HA (SEPSIS, n = 5); (3) sepsis group with HA at norepinephrine initiation (EARLY, n = 8); and (4) sepsis group with HA initiated at norepinephrine rate reaching 0.5 μg/kg/min (LATE, n = 8). INTERVENTIONS: Peritoneal sepsis was induced by cultivated autologous feces inoculation. A CytoSorb cartridge (200 g) with a blood flow rate of 200 mL/min and heparin anticoagulation was used to perform HA. The animals received sedation and intensive organ support up to 48 h or until they experienced cardiovascular collapse. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Systemic hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, and immune-inflammatory response were measured at predefined periods. The HA treatment was not associated with any measurable benefit in terms of systemic hemodynamics and organ support. The systemic inflammatory markers were unaffected by any of the treatment timings. In contrast, the HA resulted in higher vasopressor load and decreased 36-h survival (5 animals in SHAM (100%), 4 (80%) in SEPSIS, 4 (57%) in EARLY, and 2 (25%) in LATE; p = 0.041). The HA exposure in healthy animals was associated with hemodynamic deterioration, systemic inflammatory response, and cytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-animal-controlled fulminant sepsis study, the HA was unable to counteract the disease progression in the early or advanced septic shock phase. However, findings from the HA-exposed sham animals suggest potential safety concerns.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24012984
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240726151457.0
007      
ta
008      
240723s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s40635-024-00622-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38635084
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Tegl, Vaclav $u Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care Medicine, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Ineffectiveness of hemoadsorption in large animals with abdominal sepsis: a randomized controlled porcine study / $c V. Tegl, J. Horak, L. Nalos, M. Horakova, M. Stengl, M. Matejovic, J. Benes
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: The use of hemoadsorption (HA) has become popular in the treatment of vasoplegic states associated with massive cytokine release, including septic shock. However, this approach does not seem to be based on robust evidence, and it does not follow international guidelines. To understand the pathophysiological rationale and timing of HA, we conducted a large animal septic shock experiment. DESIGN: Prospective randomized large-animal peritoneal septic shock experiment. SETTING: Laboratory investigation. SUBJECTS: Twenty-six anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs randomly assigned into (1) sham-operated group with HA (SHAM, n = 5); (2) sepsis animals without HA (SEPSIS, n = 5); (3) sepsis group with HA at norepinephrine initiation (EARLY, n = 8); and (4) sepsis group with HA initiated at norepinephrine rate reaching 0.5 μg/kg/min (LATE, n = 8). INTERVENTIONS: Peritoneal sepsis was induced by cultivated autologous feces inoculation. A CytoSorb cartridge (200 g) with a blood flow rate of 200 mL/min and heparin anticoagulation was used to perform HA. The animals received sedation and intensive organ support up to 48 h or until they experienced cardiovascular collapse. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Systemic hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, and immune-inflammatory response were measured at predefined periods. The HA treatment was not associated with any measurable benefit in terms of systemic hemodynamics and organ support. The systemic inflammatory markers were unaffected by any of the treatment timings. In contrast, the HA resulted in higher vasopressor load and decreased 36-h survival (5 animals in SHAM (100%), 4 (80%) in SEPSIS, 4 (57%) in EARLY, and 2 (25%) in LATE; p = 0.041). The HA exposure in healthy animals was associated with hemodynamic deterioration, systemic inflammatory response, and cytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-animal-controlled fulminant sepsis study, the HA was unable to counteract the disease progression in the early or advanced septic shock phase. However, findings from the HA-exposed sham animals suggest potential safety concerns.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Horak, Jan $u Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care Medicine, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nalos, Lukas $u Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care Medicine, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Horakova, Michala $u Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care Medicine, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Stengl, Milan $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Matejovic, Martin $u Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care Medicine, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Benes, Jan $u Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care Medicine, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic. benesj@fnplzen.cz $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. benesj@fnplzen.cz $u Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic. benesj@fnplzen.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000297839683
773    0_
$w MED00196663 $t Intensive care medicine experimental $x 2197-425X $g Roč. 12, č. 1 (2024), s. 38
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38635084 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240723 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240726151450 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2125552 $s 1224847
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 12 $c 1 $d 38 $e 20240418 $i 2197-425X $m Intensive care medicine experimental $n Intensive Care Med Exp $x MED00196663
GRA    __
$a COOPERACIO $p Lékařská Fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240723

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...