-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Shape or size matters? Towards standard reporting of tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues: systematic review and finite element analysis
AC. Lin, F. Pirrung, JA. Niestrawska, B. Ondruschka, G. Pinter, P. Henyš, N. Hammer
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu systematický přehled
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2013
Free Medical Journals
od 2013
PubMed Central
od 2013
Europe PubMed Central
od 2013
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2013
- Publikační typ
- systematický přehled MeSH
Material properties of soft-tissue samples are often derived through uniaxial tensile testing. For engineering materials, testing parameters (e.g., sample geometries and clamping conditions) are described by international standards; for biological tissues, such standards do not exist. To investigate what testing parameters have been reported for tensile testing of human soft-tissue samples, a systematic review of the literature was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Soft tissues are described as anisotropic and/or hyperelastic. Thus, we explored how the retrieved parameters compared against standards for engineering materials of similar characteristics. All research articles published in English, with an Abstract, and before 1 January 2023 were retrieved from databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and BASE. After screening of articles based on search terms and exclusion criteria, a total 1,096 articles were assessed for eligibility, from which 361 studies were retrieved and included in this review. We found that a non-tapered shape is most common (209 of 361), followed by a tapered sample shape (92 of 361). However, clamping conditions varied and were underreported (156 of 361). As a preliminary attempt to explore how the retrieved parameters might influence the stress distribution under tensile loading, a pilot study was performed using finite element analysis (FEA) and constitutive modeling for a clamped sample of little or no fiber dispersion. The preliminary FE simulation results might suggest the hypothesis that different sample geometries could have a profound influence on the stress-distribution under tensile loading. However, no conclusions can be drawn from these simulations, and future studies should involve exploring different sample geometries under different computational models and sample parameters (such as fiber dispersion and clamping effects). Taken together, reporting and choice of testing parameters remain as challenges, and as such, recommendations towards standard reporting of uniaxial tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues are proposed.
Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Fraunhofer Institute for Forming Tools Division of Biomechatronics Dresden Germany
Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Austria
Institute of Legal Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Institute of Materials Science and Testing of Polymers Montanuniversität Leoben Leoben Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013103
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240726151523.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240723e20240326sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1368383 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38600944
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Lin, Alvin C $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria $u Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- 245 10
- $a Shape or size matters? Towards standard reporting of tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues: systematic review and finite element analysis / $c AC. Lin, F. Pirrung, JA. Niestrawska, B. Ondruschka, G. Pinter, P. Henyš, N. Hammer
- 520 9_
- $a Material properties of soft-tissue samples are often derived through uniaxial tensile testing. For engineering materials, testing parameters (e.g., sample geometries and clamping conditions) are described by international standards; for biological tissues, such standards do not exist. To investigate what testing parameters have been reported for tensile testing of human soft-tissue samples, a systematic review of the literature was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Soft tissues are described as anisotropic and/or hyperelastic. Thus, we explored how the retrieved parameters compared against standards for engineering materials of similar characteristics. All research articles published in English, with an Abstract, and before 1 January 2023 were retrieved from databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and BASE. After screening of articles based on search terms and exclusion criteria, a total 1,096 articles were assessed for eligibility, from which 361 studies were retrieved and included in this review. We found that a non-tapered shape is most common (209 of 361), followed by a tapered sample shape (92 of 361). However, clamping conditions varied and were underreported (156 of 361). As a preliminary attempt to explore how the retrieved parameters might influence the stress distribution under tensile loading, a pilot study was performed using finite element analysis (FEA) and constitutive modeling for a clamped sample of little or no fiber dispersion. The preliminary FE simulation results might suggest the hypothesis that different sample geometries could have a profound influence on the stress-distribution under tensile loading. However, no conclusions can be drawn from these simulations, and future studies should involve exploring different sample geometries under different computational models and sample parameters (such as fiber dispersion and clamping effects). Taken together, reporting and choice of testing parameters remain as challenges, and as such, recommendations towards standard reporting of uniaxial tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues are proposed.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Pirrung, Felix $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Niestrawska, Justyna A $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Ondruschka, Benjamin $u Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Pinter, Gerald $u Institute of Materials Science and Testing of Polymers, Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Henyš, Petr $u Institute of New Technologies and Applied Informatics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Informatics and Interdisciplinary Studies, Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Hammer, Niels $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria $u Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany $u Fraunhofer Institute for Forming Tools, Division of Biomechatronics, Dresden, Germany
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188064 $t Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $x 2296-4185 $g Roč. 12 (20240326), s. 1368383
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38600944 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240723 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240726151516 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2125602 $s 1224966
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 12 $c - $d 1368383 $e 20240326 $i 2296-4185 $m Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $n Front Bioeng Biotechnol $x MED00188064
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240723