Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Shape or size matters? Towards standard reporting of tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues: systematic review and finite element analysis

AC. Lin, F. Pirrung, JA. Niestrawska, B. Ondruschka, G. Pinter, P. Henyš, N. Hammer

. 2024 ; 12 (-) : 1368383. [pub] 20240326

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24013103

Material properties of soft-tissue samples are often derived through uniaxial tensile testing. For engineering materials, testing parameters (e.g., sample geometries and clamping conditions) are described by international standards; for biological tissues, such standards do not exist. To investigate what testing parameters have been reported for tensile testing of human soft-tissue samples, a systematic review of the literature was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Soft tissues are described as anisotropic and/or hyperelastic. Thus, we explored how the retrieved parameters compared against standards for engineering materials of similar characteristics. All research articles published in English, with an Abstract, and before 1 January 2023 were retrieved from databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and BASE. After screening of articles based on search terms and exclusion criteria, a total 1,096 articles were assessed for eligibility, from which 361 studies were retrieved and included in this review. We found that a non-tapered shape is most common (209 of 361), followed by a tapered sample shape (92 of 361). However, clamping conditions varied and were underreported (156 of 361). As a preliminary attempt to explore how the retrieved parameters might influence the stress distribution under tensile loading, a pilot study was performed using finite element analysis (FEA) and constitutive modeling for a clamped sample of little or no fiber dispersion. The preliminary FE simulation results might suggest the hypothesis that different sample geometries could have a profound influence on the stress-distribution under tensile loading. However, no conclusions can be drawn from these simulations, and future studies should involve exploring different sample geometries under different computational models and sample parameters (such as fiber dispersion and clamping effects). Taken together, reporting and choice of testing parameters remain as challenges, and as such, recommendations towards standard reporting of uniaxial tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues are proposed.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24013103
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240726151523.0
007      
ta
008      
240723e20240326sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1368383 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38600944
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Lin, Alvin C $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria $u Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
245    10
$a Shape or size matters? Towards standard reporting of tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues: systematic review and finite element analysis / $c AC. Lin, F. Pirrung, JA. Niestrawska, B. Ondruschka, G. Pinter, P. Henyš, N. Hammer
520    9_
$a Material properties of soft-tissue samples are often derived through uniaxial tensile testing. For engineering materials, testing parameters (e.g., sample geometries and clamping conditions) are described by international standards; for biological tissues, such standards do not exist. To investigate what testing parameters have been reported for tensile testing of human soft-tissue samples, a systematic review of the literature was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Soft tissues are described as anisotropic and/or hyperelastic. Thus, we explored how the retrieved parameters compared against standards for engineering materials of similar characteristics. All research articles published in English, with an Abstract, and before 1 January 2023 were retrieved from databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and BASE. After screening of articles based on search terms and exclusion criteria, a total 1,096 articles were assessed for eligibility, from which 361 studies were retrieved and included in this review. We found that a non-tapered shape is most common (209 of 361), followed by a tapered sample shape (92 of 361). However, clamping conditions varied and were underreported (156 of 361). As a preliminary attempt to explore how the retrieved parameters might influence the stress distribution under tensile loading, a pilot study was performed using finite element analysis (FEA) and constitutive modeling for a clamped sample of little or no fiber dispersion. The preliminary FE simulation results might suggest the hypothesis that different sample geometries could have a profound influence on the stress-distribution under tensile loading. However, no conclusions can be drawn from these simulations, and future studies should involve exploring different sample geometries under different computational models and sample parameters (such as fiber dispersion and clamping effects). Taken together, reporting and choice of testing parameters remain as challenges, and as such, recommendations towards standard reporting of uniaxial tensile testing parameters for human soft tissues are proposed.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Pirrung, Felix $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
700    1_
$a Niestrawska, Justyna A $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
700    1_
$a Ondruschka, Benjamin $u Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Pinter, Gerald $u Institute of Materials Science and Testing of Polymers, Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben, Austria
700    1_
$a Henyš, Petr $u Institute of New Technologies and Applied Informatics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Informatics and Interdisciplinary Studies, Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, Czechia
700    1_
$a Hammer, Niels $u Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria $u Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany $u Fraunhofer Institute for Forming Tools, Division of Biomechatronics, Dresden, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00188064 $t Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $x 2296-4185 $g Roč. 12 (20240326), s. 1368383
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38600944 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240723 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240726151516 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2125602 $s 1224966
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 12 $c - $d 1368383 $e 20240326 $i 2296-4185 $m Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology $n Front Bioeng Biotechnol $x MED00188064
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240723

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...