-
Something wrong with this record ?
Early history of the study of bone growth (1722-1875)
J. Bartoníček, O. Naňka
Language English Country Germany
Document type Historical Article, Journal Article
Grant support
MO1012
IP DZRVO
- MeSH
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Bone Development * physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Historical Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Bone growth is a fascinating process, primarily due to its complexity. Equally engaging is the history of its study, which, however, remains unknown to most anatomists and surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. RESULTS: The early history of bone growth study may be divided into two periods. Firstly, the experimental one, between 1722 and 1847, which consisted in the study of bone growth by the drilling of benchmark holes into the diaphysis, and examination of growing bones in madder-fed animals. In the course of one century, four French scientists (Henri-Louis Duhamel du Monceau, Marie-Jean-Pierre Flourens, Gaspard Auguste Brullé and Frédéric Léopold Hugueny) and one British researcher (John Hunter) proved experimentally that the longitudinal growth of long bones occurred only at its epiphyseal ends and their final shape resulted from apposition and resorption processes taking place simultaneously both on the periosteal and intramedullary surfaces of the bone. In the second, the microscopic period (1836-1875), the physeal growth cartilage was discovered and described in detail, including its importance for the longitudinal growth of long bones. The first description of growth cartilage was published by a Swiss anatomist Miescher in 1836. Subsequently, this structure was studied by a number of English, German and French anatomists and surgeons. This whole period was concluded by Alfred Kölliker ́s extensive study of bone resorption and its significance for typical bone shapes and Karl Langer ́s study of the vascular supply of the growing and mature bone. CONCLUSION: Research by French, English, German and Swiss scientists between 1727 and 1875 yielded fundamental insights into the growth of long bones, most of which are still valid today.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013407
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905133431.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00264-024-06157-w $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38528251
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Bartoníček, Jan $u Department of Orthopedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and the Central Military Hospital, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000222281443 $7 nlk19990073000
- 245 10
- $a Early history of the study of bone growth (1722-1875) / $c J. Bartoníček, O. Naňka
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Bone growth is a fascinating process, primarily due to its complexity. Equally engaging is the history of its study, which, however, remains unknown to most anatomists and surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. RESULTS: The early history of bone growth study may be divided into two periods. Firstly, the experimental one, between 1722 and 1847, which consisted in the study of bone growth by the drilling of benchmark holes into the diaphysis, and examination of growing bones in madder-fed animals. In the course of one century, four French scientists (Henri-Louis Duhamel du Monceau, Marie-Jean-Pierre Flourens, Gaspard Auguste Brullé and Frédéric Léopold Hugueny) and one British researcher (John Hunter) proved experimentally that the longitudinal growth of long bones occurred only at its epiphyseal ends and their final shape resulted from apposition and resorption processes taking place simultaneously both on the periosteal and intramedullary surfaces of the bone. In the second, the microscopic period (1836-1875), the physeal growth cartilage was discovered and described in detail, including its importance for the longitudinal growth of long bones. The first description of growth cartilage was published by a Swiss anatomist Miescher in 1836. Subsequently, this structure was studied by a number of English, German and French anatomists and surgeons. This whole period was concluded by Alfred Kölliker ́s extensive study of bone resorption and its significance for typical bone shapes and Karl Langer ́s study of the vascular supply of the growing and mature bone. CONCLUSION: Research by French, English, German and Swiss scientists between 1727 and 1875 yielded fundamental insights into the growth of long bones, most of which are still valid today.
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 19. století $7 D049672
- 650 12
- $a vývoj kostí $x fyziologie $7 D001846
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 18. století $7 D049671
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 655 _2
- $a historické články $7 D016456
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Naňka, Ondřej $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic. Ondrej.Nanka@lf1.cuni.cz $1 https://orcid.org/000000026300395X $7 mzk2006348905
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 48, č. 7 (2024), s. 1915-1922
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38528251 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905133425 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143304 $s 1225273
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 48 $c 7 $d 1915-1922 $e 20240325 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
- GRA __
- $a MO1012 $p IP DZRVO
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725