Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The IDEAL PROCESS for developing Assistive Technology policy

ID. Ebuenyi, EM. Smith, MZ. Jamali, A. Munthali, M. MacLachlan

. 2024 ; 36 (3) : 224-231. [pub] 20230919

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24014009

Policy development and implementation are key to improving access to Assistive Technology (AT). In this paper, we describe a strength-based framework for doing this at national level. We used an action research approach, with the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disability (UNCRPD) as the primary frame of reference. Primary data were collected using the World Health Organisation's rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA). We describe the process of applying our emergent framework and how our findings support it. We identified seven guiding principles for effective policy process: Participatory, Resource aware, Outcomes focused, Collaborative, Evidence-informed, supporting good practices, and System strengthening - which can be summarized by the acronym PROCESS. Five crucial building blocks for effective AT policy development emerged: Identification of the assistive technology ecosystem, Demography of disability and AT use, Evaluation of inclusion and participation in existing policy, Alignment with UNCRPD and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Locality of implementation - which can be summarized with the acronym IDEAL. The IDEAL PROCESS incorporates key content building blocks and core process principles, constituting a systematic framework for guiding the development of context sensitive AT policy and a strength-based pathway to improving access AT.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24014009
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240905134114.0
007      
ta
008      
240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/10400435.2023.2254359 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37725484
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Ebuenyi, Ikenna D $u Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000233296296
245    14
$a The IDEAL PROCESS for developing Assistive Technology policy / $c ID. Ebuenyi, EM. Smith, MZ. Jamali, A. Munthali, M. MacLachlan
520    9_
$a Policy development and implementation are key to improving access to Assistive Technology (AT). In this paper, we describe a strength-based framework for doing this at national level. We used an action research approach, with the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disability (UNCRPD) as the primary frame of reference. Primary data were collected using the World Health Organisation's rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA). We describe the process of applying our emergent framework and how our findings support it. We identified seven guiding principles for effective policy process: Participatory, Resource aware, Outcomes focused, Collaborative, Evidence-informed, supporting good practices, and System strengthening - which can be summarized by the acronym PROCESS. Five crucial building blocks for effective AT policy development emerged: Identification of the assistive technology ecosystem, Demography of disability and AT use, Evaluation of inclusion and participation in existing policy, Alignment with UNCRPD and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Locality of implementation - which can be summarized with the acronym IDEAL. The IDEAL PROCESS incorporates key content building blocks and core process principles, constituting a systematic framework for guiding the development of context sensitive AT policy and a strength-based pathway to improving access AT.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a pomůcky pro sebeobsluhu $7 D012656
650    12
$a postižení $x rehabilitace $7 D006233
650    _2
$a vytváření politiky $7 D011050
650    _2
$a zdravotní politika $7 D006291
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Smith, Emma M $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000325415723
700    1_
$a Jamali, Monica Z $u Centre for Social Research, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi $1 https://orcid.org/0000000278498158
700    1_
$a Munthali, Alister $u Centre for Social Research, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi $1 https://orcid.org/0000000234953446
700    1_
$a MacLachlan, Malcolm $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000166729206 $7 uk2010365713
773    0_
$w MED00172763 $t Assistive technology $x 1949-3614 $g Roč. 36, č. 3 (2024), s. 224-231
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37725484 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240725 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240905134108 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2143666 $s 1225875
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 36 $c 3 $d 224-231 $e 20230919 $i 1949-3614 $m Assistive technology $n Assist Technol $x MED00172763
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240725

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...