-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The IDEAL PROCESS for developing Assistive Technology policy
ID. Ebuenyi, EM. Smith, MZ. Jamali, A. Munthali, M. MacLachlan
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pomůcky pro sebeobsluhu * MeSH
- postižení * rehabilitace MeSH
- vytváření politiky MeSH
- zdravotní politika MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Policy development and implementation are key to improving access to Assistive Technology (AT). In this paper, we describe a strength-based framework for doing this at national level. We used an action research approach, with the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disability (UNCRPD) as the primary frame of reference. Primary data were collected using the World Health Organisation's rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA). We describe the process of applying our emergent framework and how our findings support it. We identified seven guiding principles for effective policy process: Participatory, Resource aware, Outcomes focused, Collaborative, Evidence-informed, supporting good practices, and System strengthening - which can be summarized by the acronym PROCESS. Five crucial building blocks for effective AT policy development emerged: Identification of the assistive technology ecosystem, Demography of disability and AT use, Evaluation of inclusion and participation in existing policy, Alignment with UNCRPD and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Locality of implementation - which can be summarized with the acronym IDEAL. The IDEAL PROCESS incorporates key content building blocks and core process principles, constituting a systematic framework for guiding the development of context sensitive AT policy and a strength-based pathway to improving access AT.
Centre for Social Research University of Malawi Zomba Malawi
Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24014009
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134114.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/10400435.2023.2254359 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37725484
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Ebuenyi, Ikenna D $u Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000233296296
- 245 14
- $a The IDEAL PROCESS for developing Assistive Technology policy / $c ID. Ebuenyi, EM. Smith, MZ. Jamali, A. Munthali, M. MacLachlan
- 520 9_
- $a Policy development and implementation are key to improving access to Assistive Technology (AT). In this paper, we describe a strength-based framework for doing this at national level. We used an action research approach, with the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disability (UNCRPD) as the primary frame of reference. Primary data were collected using the World Health Organisation's rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA). We describe the process of applying our emergent framework and how our findings support it. We identified seven guiding principles for effective policy process: Participatory, Resource aware, Outcomes focused, Collaborative, Evidence-informed, supporting good practices, and System strengthening - which can be summarized by the acronym PROCESS. Five crucial building blocks for effective AT policy development emerged: Identification of the assistive technology ecosystem, Demography of disability and AT use, Evaluation of inclusion and participation in existing policy, Alignment with UNCRPD and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Locality of implementation - which can be summarized with the acronym IDEAL. The IDEAL PROCESS incorporates key content building blocks and core process principles, constituting a systematic framework for guiding the development of context sensitive AT policy and a strength-based pathway to improving access AT.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a pomůcky pro sebeobsluhu $7 D012656
- 650 12
- $a postižení $x rehabilitace $7 D006233
- 650 _2
- $a vytváření politiky $7 D011050
- 650 _2
- $a zdravotní politika $7 D006291
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Smith, Emma M $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000325415723
- 700 1_
- $a Jamali, Monica Z $u Centre for Social Research, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi $1 https://orcid.org/0000000278498158
- 700 1_
- $a Munthali, Alister $u Centre for Social Research, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi $1 https://orcid.org/0000000234953446
- 700 1_
- $a MacLachlan, Malcolm $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000166729206 $7 uk2010365713
- 773 0_
- $w MED00172763 $t Assistive technology $x 1949-3614 $g Roč. 36, č. 3 (2024), s. 224-231
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37725484 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134108 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143666 $s 1225875
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 36 $c 3 $d 224-231 $e 20230919 $i 1949-3614 $m Assistive technology $n Assist Technol $x MED00172763
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725