-
Something wrong with this record ?
Parents' experiences of remote microphone systems for children with hearing loss
K. Gabova, Z. Meier, P. Tavel
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Deafness * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mothers MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Hearing Loss * MeSH
- Speech Perception * MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Hearing Aids * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: Remote microphone systems improve intelligibility in difficult conditions when the performance of hearing aids/cochlear implants is insufficient. The purpose of this study was to explore parents' experiences with remote microphone systems for their children with hearing loss and to determine the advantages and disadvantages as perceived by parents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews with parents of children with moderate to profound bilateral hearing loss (2-19 years old). The open coding method and thematic analysis were used. The final sample consisted of 19 mothers and 9 fathers who had experience with remote microphone systems. RESULTS: Parents listed the advantages of remote microphone systems for their child, for themselves and for other carers, such as better hearing and understanding, a life more similar to that of their peers without hearing loss, safety in road traffic, lower fatigue, vocabulary acquisition, better school results. Some limitations were identified, namely low benefits, technical issues and a reluctance to use the device by children or teachers. CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to provide parents with information about assistive devices and the consequences of limited access to hearing speech. Professionals should motivate parents, children and teachers to use remote microphone systems even in situations when the benefit may not be obvious if there is a potential benefit for the child. UNLABELLED: IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe main advantages of remote microphone systems perceived by parents are better hearing and understanding, a life more similar to peers without hearing loss, safety in traffic, lower fatigue, vocabulary acquisition and better school results.The main disadvantages are for parents: persisting hearing problems, low benefits, technical issues and a reluctance to use the device by children or teachers.Sufficient and accurate information is needed about remote microphone systems, but also about the consequences of hearing loss in general.The possibility to try wireless devices before buying and troubleshooting help is appreciated.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24014517
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134343.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/17483107.2022.2128443 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36198072
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Gabova, Kristyna $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000200290779
- 245 10
- $a Parents' experiences of remote microphone systems for children with hearing loss / $c K. Gabova, Z. Meier, P. Tavel
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Remote microphone systems improve intelligibility in difficult conditions when the performance of hearing aids/cochlear implants is insufficient. The purpose of this study was to explore parents' experiences with remote microphone systems for their children with hearing loss and to determine the advantages and disadvantages as perceived by parents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews with parents of children with moderate to profound bilateral hearing loss (2-19 years old). The open coding method and thematic analysis were used. The final sample consisted of 19 mothers and 9 fathers who had experience with remote microphone systems. RESULTS: Parents listed the advantages of remote microphone systems for their child, for themselves and for other carers, such as better hearing and understanding, a life more similar to that of their peers without hearing loss, safety in road traffic, lower fatigue, vocabulary acquisition, better school results. Some limitations were identified, namely low benefits, technical issues and a reluctance to use the device by children or teachers. CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to provide parents with information about assistive devices and the consequences of limited access to hearing speech. Professionals should motivate parents, children and teachers to use remote microphone systems even in situations when the benefit may not be obvious if there is a potential benefit for the child. UNLABELLED: IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe main advantages of remote microphone systems perceived by parents are better hearing and understanding, a life more similar to peers without hearing loss, safety in traffic, lower fatigue, vocabulary acquisition and better school results.The main disadvantages are for parents: persisting hearing problems, low benefits, technical issues and a reluctance to use the device by children or teachers.Sufficient and accurate information is needed about remote microphone systems, but also about the consequences of hearing loss in general.The possibility to try wireless devices before buying and troubleshooting help is appreciated.
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a percepce řeči $7 D013067
- 650 12
- $a nedoslýchavost $7 D034381
- 650 12
- $a hluchota $7 D003638
- 650 12
- $a sluchové pomůcky $7 D006310
- 650 _2
- $a matky $7 D009035
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Meier, Zdenek $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000198106230
- 700 1_
- $a Tavel, Peter $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000017072001X $7 mzk2007381874
- 773 0_
- $w MED00197294 $t Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology $x 1748-3115 $g Roč. 19, č. 3 (2024), s. 831-840
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36198072 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134337 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143961 $s 1226383
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 19 $c 3 $d 831-840 $e 20221005 $i 1748-3115 $m Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology $n Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol $x MED00197294
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725