-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
E. M. and others vs. Norway and the proportionality of other judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Tomáš Zdechovský, Jitka Fialová
Status minimální Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
In the E. M. case, two sons were removed from a Czech family in Norway in 2011 due to suspicion of sexual abuse by the father. This abuse was not proven, but the sons were not returned to the mother, against whom accusations appeared in the form of alleged neglect and later media coverage of the case against the children’s interests. The boys were separated into two different foster families, and the mother’s visiting rights were gradually reduced from two hours twice a week to 15 supervised minutes twice a year – and only with the younger son. In 2017, the mother also lost her parental rights. The case ended up at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which accepted Norway’s full argumentation without examination and stated that there was no violation of the right to family life according to Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (the Convention).
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24016983
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250319093541.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240930s2024 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.32725/jnss.2024.006 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Zdechovský, Tomáš, $d 1979- $7 jo2007376664 $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a E. M. and others vs. Norway and the proportionality of other judgments of the European Court of Human Rights / $c Tomáš Zdechovský, Jitka Fialová
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a In the E. M. case, two sons were removed from a Czech family in Norway in 2011 due to suspicion of sexual abuse by the father. This abuse was not proven, but the sons were not returned to the mother, against whom accusations appeared in the form of alleged neglect and later media coverage of the case against the children’s interests. The boys were separated into two different foster families, and the mother’s visiting rights were gradually reduced from two hours twice a week to 15 supervised minutes twice a year – and only with the younger son. In 2017, the mother also lost her parental rights. The case ended up at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which accepted Norway’s full argumentation without examination and stated that there was no violation of the right to family life according to Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (the Convention).
- 700 1_
- $a Fialová, Jitka $7 xx0318729 $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $t Journal of nursing, social studies and public health $x 1804-1868 $g Roč. 15, č. 1-2 (2024), s. 66-82 $w MED00171246
- 856 41
- $u https://jnss.zsf.jcu.cz/artkey/jns-202401-0006_e-m-and-others-vs-norway-and-the-proportionality-of-other-judgments-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights.php $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 4268 $c 673 $y 0 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240809134012 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250319093536 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a min $b bmc $g 2187681 $s 1228924
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 15 $c 1-2 $d 66-82 $i 1804-1868 $m Journal of nursing, social studies and public health $n J. Nurs. Soc. Stud. Public Health (Print) $x MED00171246
- LZP __
- $a NLK 2024-30/dk
