-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Alternative Surgical Treatment Method for 5th Metacarpal Neck Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Intramedullary and Transverse K-Wire Fixations with Additional Antirotational K-Wire [Alternativní chirurgická léčebná metoda pro zlomeninu krčku 5. metakarpu: porovnání klinických výsledků intramedulárních a příčných fixací K-drátem s dodatečným antirotačním K-drátem]
U. O. Kasman, C. Turemis, S. Surucu, Ö. Korkmaz
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie
PubMed
39342644
DOI
10.55095/achot2024/030
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fraktury kostí * chirurgie MeSH
- intramedulární fixace fraktury * metody přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- kostní dráty * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metakarpální kosti * zranění chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- vnitřní fixace fraktury metody přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications associated with intramedullary and transverse K-wire fixations of 5th metacarpal neck fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were operated for 5th metacarpal neck fractures between 2019 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Regarding the surgical treatment methods, patients were assessed by dividing them into two groups. The first group comprised patients who underwent treatment with an intramedullary K-wire. The second group comprises patients who underwent transverse K-wire fixation. RESULTS: The average quick DASH score of all patients was 5.6±4.7 in the intramedullary K-wire fixation group and 5.9±5.1 in the transverse K-wire fixation group. An average 5th finger metacarpophalangeal joint extension limitation was 6.2±5.7° in the intramedullary fixation group and 6.1±5.8° in the transverse K-wire group. The mean radiological union time was 4.9±0.7 weeks in the intramedullary fixation group and 5.1±0.7 weeks in the transverse K-wire group. No statistically significant difference was found between the quick DASH scores and degrees of the MCP joint extension limitation ( p=0.785). Intramedullary fixation and transverse K-wire fixations are effective surgical treatment methods for metacarpal neck fractures. DISCUSSION: It has been reported that the intramedullary fixation method in metacarpal bone fractures is more effective than the fixation methods with cross and transverse K-wire. But our results revealed no difference in clinical outcomes between the two surgical fixation methods. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no statistically significant difference between the two fixation techniques with regard to union, clinical outcomes, or complications. KEY WORDS: intramedullary fixation; metacarpal neck fracture; transverse K-wire fixation.
Cesme Alper Cizgenakat State Hospital Department of Orthopedics Izmir Turkey
Yale University Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation New Haven United States
Alternativní chirurgická léčebná metoda pro zlomeninu krčku 5. metakarpu: porovnání klinických výsledků intramedulárních a příčných fixací K-drátem s dodatečným antirotačním K-drátem
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24017544
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250402155224.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241004s2024 xr a f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.55095/ACHOT2024/030 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39342644
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Kasman, U. O. $u Bahçeşehir University Medical School, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, VM Medicalpark Pendik Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul, Turkey
- 245 10
- $a Alternative Surgical Treatment Method for 5th Metacarpal Neck Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Intramedullary and Transverse K-Wire Fixations with Additional Antirotational K-Wire / $c U. O. Kasman, C. Turemis, S. Surucu, Ö. Korkmaz
- 246 31
- $a Alternativní chirurgická léčebná metoda pro zlomeninu krčku 5. metakarpu: porovnání klinických výsledků intramedulárních a příčných fixací K-drátem s dodatečným antirotačním K-drátem
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications associated with intramedullary and transverse K-wire fixations of 5th metacarpal neck fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were operated for 5th metacarpal neck fractures between 2019 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Regarding the surgical treatment methods, patients were assessed by dividing them into two groups. The first group comprised patients who underwent treatment with an intramedullary K-wire. The second group comprises patients who underwent transverse K-wire fixation. RESULTS: The average quick DASH score of all patients was 5.6±4.7 in the intramedullary K-wire fixation group and 5.9±5.1 in the transverse K-wire fixation group. An average 5th finger metacarpophalangeal joint extension limitation was 6.2±5.7° in the intramedullary fixation group and 6.1±5.8° in the transverse K-wire group. The mean radiological union time was 4.9±0.7 weeks in the intramedullary fixation group and 5.1±0.7 weeks in the transverse K-wire group. No statistically significant difference was found between the quick DASH scores and degrees of the MCP joint extension limitation ( p=0.785). Intramedullary fixation and transverse K-wire fixations are effective surgical treatment methods for metacarpal neck fractures. DISCUSSION: It has been reported that the intramedullary fixation method in metacarpal bone fractures is more effective than the fixation methods with cross and transverse K-wire. But our results revealed no difference in clinical outcomes between the two surgical fixation methods. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no statistically significant difference between the two fixation techniques with regard to union, clinical outcomes, or complications. KEY WORDS: intramedullary fixation; metacarpal neck fracture; transverse K-wire fixation.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a kostní dráty $7 D001864
- 650 12
- $a metakarpální kosti $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D050279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a fraktury kostí $x chirurgie $7 D050723
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a intramedulární fixace fraktury $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D005594
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D005593
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Turemis, C. $u Cesme Alper Cizgenakat State Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Izmir, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Surucu, S. $u Yale University, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, New Haven, United States
- 700 1_
- $a Korkmaz, Ö. $u Bahçeşehir University Medical School, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, VM Medicalpark Pendik Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul, Turkey
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 91, č. 4 (2024), s. 229-233
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39342644 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241004 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250402155220 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2294540 $s 1229494
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 91 $c 4 $d 229-233 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $n Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK124 $a Pubmed-20241004