Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

TEGEST as promising tool for assessing the risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders

K. Nekvindová, K. Ivanová, L. Juríčková, T. Gabrhelík

. 2024 ; 24 (1) : 713. [pub] 20240828

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24019247

BACKGROUND: Perioperative neurocognitive disorders are often neglected and undiagnosed. There are known risk factors for these disorders (e.g., higher levels of frailty, cognitive decline before surgery). However, these factors are usually not assessed in the daily clinical setting. One of the main reasons for this lack of examination is the absence of a suitable cognitive function test that can be used in acute clinical settings. The primary aim of this study was to determine correlations between preoperative and postoperative scores on three cognitive tests (the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Test of Gestures (TEGEST). METHODS: This was a prospective, monocentric, observational study that included one cohort of patients aged 65 years and older. Patients underwent acute or elective surgical operations. Preanaesthesia tests were administered. After the operation, the patients completed the same tests between the 2nd postoperative day and discharge. Preoperative and postoperative cognitive test scores were assessed. RESULTS: This study included 164 patients. The arithmetic mean age was 74.5 years. The strongest correlations were observed between MMSE scores and TEGEST scores (r = 0.830 before and 0.786 after surgery, P < 0.001). To compare the MMSE and the TEGEST, the MMSE was divided into 2 categories-normal and impaired-and good agreement was found among 76.2% of the participants (κ = 0.515). If the TEGEST scoring system was changed so that scores of 4-6 indicated normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicated cognitive impairment, the level of agreement would be 90.8%, κ = 0.817. Only 5.5% of the patients had impaired MMSE scores and normal TEGEST scores, whereas 3.7% of the respondents normal MMSE scores and impaired TEGEST scores. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the TEGEST is a suitable option for assessing cognitive functioning before surgery among patients who are at risk of developing perioperative neurocognitive disorders. This study revealed that it is necessary to change the rating scale for the TEGEST so that scores of 4-6 indicate normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicate cognitive impairment. In clinical practice, the use of the TEGEST may help to identify patients at risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019247
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024111400.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12877-024-05302-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39198728
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Nekvindová, Klára $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tomas Bata Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic. nekvindova.klara@gmail.com $u Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. nekvindova.klara@gmail.com
245    10
$a TEGEST as promising tool for assessing the risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders / $c K. Nekvindová, K. Ivanová, L. Juríčková, T. Gabrhelík
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Perioperative neurocognitive disorders are often neglected and undiagnosed. There are known risk factors for these disorders (e.g., higher levels of frailty, cognitive decline before surgery). However, these factors are usually not assessed in the daily clinical setting. One of the main reasons for this lack of examination is the absence of a suitable cognitive function test that can be used in acute clinical settings. The primary aim of this study was to determine correlations between preoperative and postoperative scores on three cognitive tests (the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Test of Gestures (TEGEST). METHODS: This was a prospective, monocentric, observational study that included one cohort of patients aged 65 years and older. Patients underwent acute or elective surgical operations. Preanaesthesia tests were administered. After the operation, the patients completed the same tests between the 2nd postoperative day and discharge. Preoperative and postoperative cognitive test scores were assessed. RESULTS: This study included 164 patients. The arithmetic mean age was 74.5 years. The strongest correlations were observed between MMSE scores and TEGEST scores (r = 0.830 before and 0.786 after surgery, P < 0.001). To compare the MMSE and the TEGEST, the MMSE was divided into 2 categories-normal and impaired-and good agreement was found among 76.2% of the participants (κ = 0.515). If the TEGEST scoring system was changed so that scores of 4-6 indicated normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicated cognitive impairment, the level of agreement would be 90.8%, κ = 0.817. Only 5.5% of the patients had impaired MMSE scores and normal TEGEST scores, whereas 3.7% of the respondents normal MMSE scores and impaired TEGEST scores. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the TEGEST is a suitable option for assessing cognitive functioning before surgery among patients who are at risk of developing perioperative neurocognitive disorders. This study revealed that it is necessary to change the rating scale for the TEGEST so that scores of 4-6 indicate normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicate cognitive impairment. In clinical practice, the use of the TEGEST may help to identify patients at risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a neurokognitivní poruchy $x diagnóza $x psychologie $7 D019965
650    _2
$a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
650    _2
$a kognitivní dysfunkce $x diagnóza $x psychologie $x etiologie $7 D060825
650    _2
$a testy pro posouzení mentálních funkcí a demence $7 D000073216
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x diagnóza $x psychologie $x etiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a perioperační období $7 D059035
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Ivanová, K $u Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Juríčková, L $u Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gabrhelík, Tomáš $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tomas Bata Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00008182 $t BMC geriatrics $x 1471-2318 $g Roč. 24, č. 1 (2024), s. 713
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39198728 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024111354 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2201851 $s 1231220
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 24 $c 1 $d 713 $e 20240828 $i 1471-2318 $m BMC geriatrics $n BMC Geriatr $x MED00008182
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...