-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
TEGEST as promising tool for assessing the risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders
K. Nekvindová, K. Ivanová, L. Juríčková, T. Gabrhelík
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-08-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- hodnocení rizik metody MeSH
- kognitivní dysfunkce diagnóza psychologie etiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- neurokognitivní poruchy * diagnóza psychologie MeSH
- neuropsychologické testy MeSH
- perioperační období MeSH
- pooperační komplikace diagnóza psychologie etiologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- testy pro posouzení mentálních funkcí a demence MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Perioperative neurocognitive disorders are often neglected and undiagnosed. There are known risk factors for these disorders (e.g., higher levels of frailty, cognitive decline before surgery). However, these factors are usually not assessed in the daily clinical setting. One of the main reasons for this lack of examination is the absence of a suitable cognitive function test that can be used in acute clinical settings. The primary aim of this study was to determine correlations between preoperative and postoperative scores on three cognitive tests (the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Test of Gestures (TEGEST). METHODS: This was a prospective, monocentric, observational study that included one cohort of patients aged 65 years and older. Patients underwent acute or elective surgical operations. Preanaesthesia tests were administered. After the operation, the patients completed the same tests between the 2nd postoperative day and discharge. Preoperative and postoperative cognitive test scores were assessed. RESULTS: This study included 164 patients. The arithmetic mean age was 74.5 years. The strongest correlations were observed between MMSE scores and TEGEST scores (r = 0.830 before and 0.786 after surgery, P < 0.001). To compare the MMSE and the TEGEST, the MMSE was divided into 2 categories-normal and impaired-and good agreement was found among 76.2% of the participants (κ = 0.515). If the TEGEST scoring system was changed so that scores of 4-6 indicated normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicated cognitive impairment, the level of agreement would be 90.8%, κ = 0.817. Only 5.5% of the patients had impaired MMSE scores and normal TEGEST scores, whereas 3.7% of the respondents normal MMSE scores and impaired TEGEST scores. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the TEGEST is a suitable option for assessing cognitive functioning before surgery among patients who are at risk of developing perioperative neurocognitive disorders. This study revealed that it is necessary to change the rating scale for the TEGEST so that scores of 4-6 indicate normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicate cognitive impairment. In clinical practice, the use of the TEGEST may help to identify patients at risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019247
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024111400.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12877-024-05302-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39198728
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Nekvindová, Klára $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tomas Bata Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic. nekvindova.klara@gmail.com $u Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. nekvindova.klara@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a TEGEST as promising tool for assessing the risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders / $c K. Nekvindová, K. Ivanová, L. Juríčková, T. Gabrhelík
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Perioperative neurocognitive disorders are often neglected and undiagnosed. There are known risk factors for these disorders (e.g., higher levels of frailty, cognitive decline before surgery). However, these factors are usually not assessed in the daily clinical setting. One of the main reasons for this lack of examination is the absence of a suitable cognitive function test that can be used in acute clinical settings. The primary aim of this study was to determine correlations between preoperative and postoperative scores on three cognitive tests (the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Test of Gestures (TEGEST). METHODS: This was a prospective, monocentric, observational study that included one cohort of patients aged 65 years and older. Patients underwent acute or elective surgical operations. Preanaesthesia tests were administered. After the operation, the patients completed the same tests between the 2nd postoperative day and discharge. Preoperative and postoperative cognitive test scores were assessed. RESULTS: This study included 164 patients. The arithmetic mean age was 74.5 years. The strongest correlations were observed between MMSE scores and TEGEST scores (r = 0.830 before and 0.786 after surgery, P < 0.001). To compare the MMSE and the TEGEST, the MMSE was divided into 2 categories-normal and impaired-and good agreement was found among 76.2% of the participants (κ = 0.515). If the TEGEST scoring system was changed so that scores of 4-6 indicated normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicated cognitive impairment, the level of agreement would be 90.8%, κ = 0.817. Only 5.5% of the patients had impaired MMSE scores and normal TEGEST scores, whereas 3.7% of the respondents normal MMSE scores and impaired TEGEST scores. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the TEGEST is a suitable option for assessing cognitive functioning before surgery among patients who are at risk of developing perioperative neurocognitive disorders. This study revealed that it is necessary to change the rating scale for the TEGEST so that scores of 4-6 indicate normal cognition and scores of 0-3 indicate cognitive impairment. In clinical practice, the use of the TEGEST may help to identify patients at risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a neurokognitivní poruchy $x diagnóza $x psychologie $7 D019965
- 650 _2
- $a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a kognitivní dysfunkce $x diagnóza $x psychologie $x etiologie $7 D060825
- 650 _2
- $a testy pro posouzení mentálních funkcí a demence $7 D000073216
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x diagnóza $x psychologie $x etiologie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a perioperační období $7 D059035
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Ivanová, K $u Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Juríčková, L $u Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Gabrhelík, Tomáš $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tomas Bata Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008182 $t BMC geriatrics $x 1471-2318 $g Roč. 24, č. 1 (2024), s. 713
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39198728 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024111354 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2201851 $s 1231220
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 24 $c 1 $d 713 $e 20240828 $i 1471-2318 $m BMC geriatrics $n BMC Geriatr $x MED00008182
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015