-
Something wrong with this record ?
Treatment Responses in Histologic Versus Molecular Diagnoses of Lung Rejection
A. Zajacova, M. Mackova, K. Halloran, P. Gauthier, J. Balko, M. Guney, D. Rakita, M. Svorcova, J. Kolarik, J. Vachtenheim, J. Pozniak, J. Simonek, L. Fila, R. Lischke, PF. Halloran, J. Havlin
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Comparative Study
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2022
PubMed Central
from 2022
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2004-05-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1988
PubMed
39131792
DOI
10.3389/ti.2024.12847
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biopsy MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lung pathology MeSH
- Graft Rejection * diagnosis pathology MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Lung Transplantation * MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Histologic evaluation of allograft biopsies after lung transplantation has several limitations, suggesting that molecular assessment using tissue transcriptomics could improve biopsy interpretation. This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated discrepancies between the histology of transbronchial biopsies (TBBs) with no rejection (NR) and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) by molecular diagnosis. The accuracy of diagnosis was assessed based on response to treatment. 54 TBBs from Prague Lung Transplant Program obtained between December 2015 and January 2020 were included. Patients with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥ 1 by histology received anti-rejection treatment. Response to therapy was defined as an increase in FEV1 of ≥ 10% 4 weeks post-biopsy compared to the pre-biopsy value. Among the 54 analyzed TBBs, 25 (46%) were concordant with histology, while 29 (54%) showed discrepancies. ACR grade 0 was found in 12 TBBs (22%) and grade A1 ≥ 1 in 42 TBBs (78%). Treatment response was present in 14% in the NR group and in 50% in the TCMR group (p = 0.024). Our findings suggest that low-grade acute cellular rejection is less likely to be associated with molecular TCMR, which might better identify lung transplant recipients who benefit from therapy.
2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre Edmonton AB Canada
Department of Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019677
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110710.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015e20240726sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/ti.2024.12847 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39131792
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Zajacova, A $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, Department of Pneumology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Treatment Responses in Histologic Versus Molecular Diagnoses of Lung Rejection / $c A. Zajacova, M. Mackova, K. Halloran, P. Gauthier, J. Balko, M. Guney, D. Rakita, M. Svorcova, J. Kolarik, J. Vachtenheim, J. Pozniak, J. Simonek, L. Fila, R. Lischke, PF. Halloran, J. Havlin
- 520 9_
- $a Histologic evaluation of allograft biopsies after lung transplantation has several limitations, suggesting that molecular assessment using tissue transcriptomics could improve biopsy interpretation. This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated discrepancies between the histology of transbronchial biopsies (TBBs) with no rejection (NR) and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) by molecular diagnosis. The accuracy of diagnosis was assessed based on response to treatment. 54 TBBs from Prague Lung Transplant Program obtained between December 2015 and January 2020 were included. Patients with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥ 1 by histology received anti-rejection treatment. Response to therapy was defined as an increase in FEV1 of ≥ 10% 4 weeks post-biopsy compared to the pre-biopsy value. Among the 54 analyzed TBBs, 25 (46%) were concordant with histology, while 29 (54%) showed discrepancies. ACR grade 0 was found in 12 TBBs (22%) and grade A1 ≥ 1 in 42 TBBs (78%). Treatment response was present in 14% in the NR group and in 50% in the TCMR group (p = 0.024). Our findings suggest that low-grade acute cellular rejection is less likely to be associated with molecular TCMR, which might better identify lung transplant recipients who benefit from therapy.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a rejekce štěpu $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D006084
- 650 12
- $a transplantace plic $7 D016040
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie $7 D001706
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a plíce $x patologie $7 D008168
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a imunosupresiva $x terapeutické užití $7 D007166
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Mackova, M $u Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Halloran, K $u Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Gauthier, P $u Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Balko, J $u Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Guney, M $u Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Rakita, D $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, Department of Pneumology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Svorcova, M $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Kolarik, J $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Vachtenheim, J $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Pozniak, J $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Simonek, J $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Fila, L $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, Department of Pneumology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Lischke, R $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Halloran, P F $u Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Havlin, J $u Prague Lung Transplant Program, 3rd Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004553 $t Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation $x 1432-2277 $g Roč. 37 (20240726), s. 12847
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39131792 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110704 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202109 $s 1231650
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 37 $c - $d 12847 $e 20240726 $i 1432-2277 $m Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation $n Transpl Int $x MED00004553
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015