Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

ENSEMBLE PLUS: final results of shorter ocrelizumab infusion from a randomized controlled trial

HP. Hartung, T. Berger, RA. Bermel, B. Brochet, WM. Carroll, T. Holmøy, R. Karabudak, J. Killestein, C. Nos, F. Patti, A. Perrin Ross, L. Vanopdenbosch, T. Vollmer, R. Buffels, M. Garas, K. Kadner, M. Manfrini, Q. Wang, MS. Freedman

. 2024 ; 271 (7) : 4348-4360. [pub] 20240422

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24019925

INTRODUCTION: Ocrelizumab is an approved intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety profile and patient preference for conventional versus shorter ocrelizumab infusions were investigated in the ENSEMBLE PLUS study. METHODS: ENSEMBLE PLUS was a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (NCT03085810), comparing outcomes in patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting MS receiving ocrelizumab 600 mg over the approved 3.5-h (conventional) versus 2-h (shorter) infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first randomized dose (RD); the secondary endpoint included IRR frequency at subsequent RDs. RESULTS: At first RD, the number of patients with an IRR in the conventional (101/373; 27.1%) versus shorter (107/372; 28.8%) infusion group was similar (difference, stratified estimates [95% CI]: 1.9% [- 4.4, 8.2]). Most IRRs (conventional: 99.4%; shorter: 97.7%) were mild/moderate. IRR frequency decreased over the course of RDs; three patients discontinued from the shorter infusion arm but continued with conventional infusion. Overall, > 98% of IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups. Pre-randomization throat irritation was predictive of future throat irritation as an IRR symptom. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were consistent with the known ocrelizumab safety profile. On completion of ENSEMBLE PLUS, most patients chose to remain on (95%) or switch to (80%) shorter infusion. CONCLUSION: ENSEMBLE PLUS demonstrates the safety and tolerability of shorter ocrelizumab infusions. Most patients remained on/switched to shorter infusion after unblinding; IRRs did not strongly influence patient decisions. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Substudy of ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810). REGISTRATION: March 21, 2017.

Basel Switzerland

Brain and Mind Centre University of Sydney Sydney Australia

Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari Barcelona Spain

Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies GF Ingrassia UOS Sclerosi Multipla Policlinico G Rodolico University of Catania Catania Italy

Department of Medicine and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa ON Canada

Department of Neurology Akershus University Hospital Lørenskog Norway

Department of Neurology AZ Sint Jan Brugge Oostende Brugge Belgium

Department of Neurology Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Ankara Turkey

Department of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Neurology MS Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands

Department of Neurology Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science The University of Western Australia Nedlands Australia

Department of Neurology UKD Medical Faculty Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd Basel Switzerland

INSERM U 1215 Neurocentre Magendie University of Bordeaux Bordeaux France

Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Loyola University Chicago Chicago Maywood IL USA

Mellen Center for MS Neurological Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USA

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019925
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024110844.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00415-024-12326-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38649522
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Hartung, Hans-Peter $u Department of Neurology, UKD, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $1 https://orcid.org/0000000206146989 $7 nlk20050167624
245    10
$a ENSEMBLE PLUS: final results of shorter ocrelizumab infusion from a randomized controlled trial / $c HP. Hartung, T. Berger, RA. Bermel, B. Brochet, WM. Carroll, T. Holmøy, R. Karabudak, J. Killestein, C. Nos, F. Patti, A. Perrin Ross, L. Vanopdenbosch, T. Vollmer, R. Buffels, M. Garas, K. Kadner, M. Manfrini, Q. Wang, MS. Freedman
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Ocrelizumab is an approved intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety profile and patient preference for conventional versus shorter ocrelizumab infusions were investigated in the ENSEMBLE PLUS study. METHODS: ENSEMBLE PLUS was a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (NCT03085810), comparing outcomes in patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting MS receiving ocrelizumab 600 mg over the approved 3.5-h (conventional) versus 2-h (shorter) infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first randomized dose (RD); the secondary endpoint included IRR frequency at subsequent RDs. RESULTS: At first RD, the number of patients with an IRR in the conventional (101/373; 27.1%) versus shorter (107/372; 28.8%) infusion group was similar (difference, stratified estimates [95% CI]: 1.9% [- 4.4, 8.2]). Most IRRs (conventional: 99.4%; shorter: 97.7%) were mild/moderate. IRR frequency decreased over the course of RDs; three patients discontinued from the shorter infusion arm but continued with conventional infusion. Overall, > 98% of IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups. Pre-randomization throat irritation was predictive of future throat irritation as an IRR symptom. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were consistent with the known ocrelizumab safety profile. On completion of ENSEMBLE PLUS, most patients chose to remain on (95%) or switch to (80%) shorter infusion. CONCLUSION: ENSEMBLE PLUS demonstrates the safety and tolerability of shorter ocrelizumab infusions. Most patients remained on/switched to shorter infusion after unblinding; IRRs did not strongly influence patient decisions. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Substudy of ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810). REGISTRATION: March 21, 2017.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    12
$a humanizované monoklonální protilátky $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D061067
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza $x farmakoterapie $7 D020529
650    _2
$a intravenózní infuze $7 D007262
650    12
$a imunologické faktory $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D007155
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Berger, Thomas $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Bermel, Robert A $u Mellen Center for MS, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
700    1_
$a Brochet, Bruno $u INSERM U 1215, Neurocentre Magendie, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
700    1_
$a Carroll, William M $u Department of Neurology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
700    1_
$a Holmøy, Trygve $u Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway $u Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
700    1_
$a Karabudak, Rana $u Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
700    1_
$a Killestein, Joep $u Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
700    1_
$a Nos, Carlos $u Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Patti, Francesco $u Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, GF Ingrassia, UOS Sclerosi Multipla Policlinico G Rodolico, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
700    1_
$a Perrin Ross, Amy $u Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA
700    1_
$a Vanopdenbosch, Ludo $u Department of Neurology, AZ Sint Jan Brugge Oostende, Brugge, Belgium
700    1_
$a Vollmer, Timothy $u University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
700    1_
$a Buffels, Regine $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland $u , Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Garas, Monika $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Kadner, Karen $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Manfrini, Marianna $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Wang, Qing $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Freedman, Mark S $u Department of Medicine and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
773    0_
$w MED00002835 $t Journal of neurology $x 1432-1459 $g Roč. 271, č. 7 (2024), s. 4348-4360
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38649522 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024110838 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2202254 $s 1231898
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 271 $c 7 $d 4348-4360 $e 20240422 $i 1432-1459 $m Journal of neurology $n J Neurol $x MED00002835
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...