-
Something wrong with this record ?
Effect of an online teaching module on midwives' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding intrapartum ultrasound: A quasi-experimental approach
B. Packet, S. Adela, R. Jute
Status not-indexed Language English Country Greece
Document type Journal Article
NLK
PubMed Central
from 2018
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2017
PubMed
39664889
DOI
10.18332/ejm/195498
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS) allows for a more reliable and reproducible assessment of fetal head station and position during labor. This study aimed to investigate how an online education module on IPUS impacts midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding this topic. METHODS: Midwives working in the labor ward of the University Hospital of Leuven (Belgium) were invited to participate in an educational program on IPUS in April 2023. A baseline KAP survey was completed upon enrolment, followed by an online education module on the intrapartum sonographic assessment of head station and position. Afterwards, a second KAP survey was completed. Score were compared using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p<0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 29.0.2.0). RESULTS: A total of 45 midwives were eligible for inclusion and invited to participate. From these, 46.7% (21/45) agreed to take part. Attitudes towards IPUS were positive, as most perceived it as safe, time-efficient, and beneficial for medical-decision making. However, only two midwives (9.1%) sometimes used IPUS themselves during the second stage, whereas none used it during the first stage. A significant improvement in knowledge scores was recorded after the online education module for both the sections on fetal head station (median score 0/5 to 2.75/5, p=0.01) and position (median score 2.5/5 to 3.5/5, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed in the overall attitude scores, as they remained overall positive (4.5/5 to 5/5, p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Although having little experience with IPUS themselves, most participating midwives perceive it as an acceptable, time-efficient, and safe imaging modality. A short online education module resulted in a significant improvement in their knowledge of these topics. Further implementation research is needed to investigate how the uptake of IPUS amongst midwives can be improved, and how this can improve overall labor care.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium
The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25001962
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250123102001.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250117e20241211gr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.18332/ejm/195498 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39664889
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Packet, Bram $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- 245 10
- $a Effect of an online teaching module on midwives' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding intrapartum ultrasound: A quasi-experimental approach / $c B. Packet, S. Adela, R. Jute
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS) allows for a more reliable and reproducible assessment of fetal head station and position during labor. This study aimed to investigate how an online education module on IPUS impacts midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding this topic. METHODS: Midwives working in the labor ward of the University Hospital of Leuven (Belgium) were invited to participate in an educational program on IPUS in April 2023. A baseline KAP survey was completed upon enrolment, followed by an online education module on the intrapartum sonographic assessment of head station and position. Afterwards, a second KAP survey was completed. Score were compared using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p<0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 29.0.2.0). RESULTS: A total of 45 midwives were eligible for inclusion and invited to participate. From these, 46.7% (21/45) agreed to take part. Attitudes towards IPUS were positive, as most perceived it as safe, time-efficient, and beneficial for medical-decision making. However, only two midwives (9.1%) sometimes used IPUS themselves during the second stage, whereas none used it during the first stage. A significant improvement in knowledge scores was recorded after the online education module for both the sections on fetal head station (median score 0/5 to 2.75/5, p=0.01) and position (median score 2.5/5 to 3.5/5, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed in the overall attitude scores, as they remained overall positive (4.5/5 to 5/5, p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Although having little experience with IPUS themselves, most participating midwives perceive it as an acceptable, time-efficient, and safe imaging modality. A short online education module resulted in a significant improvement in their knowledge of these topics. Further implementation research is needed to investigate how the uptake of IPUS amongst midwives can be improved, and how this can improve overall labor care.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Adela, Samešová $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $u The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jute, Richter $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- 773 0_
- $w MED00214241 $t European journal of midwifery $x 2585-2906 $g Roč. 10 (20241211)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39664889 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250117 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250123101955 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2254430 $s 1237965
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 10 $c - $e 20241211 $i 2585-2906 $m European journal of midwifery $n Eur J Midwifery $x MED00214241
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250117