Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Effect of an online teaching module on midwives' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding intrapartum ultrasound: A quasi-experimental approach

B. Packet, S. Adela, R. Jute

. 2024 ; 10 (-) : . [pub] 20241211

Status not-indexed Language English Country Greece

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: Intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS) allows for a more reliable and reproducible assessment of fetal head station and position during labor. This study aimed to investigate how an online education module on IPUS impacts midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding this topic. METHODS: Midwives working in the labor ward of the University Hospital of Leuven (Belgium) were invited to participate in an educational program on IPUS in April 2023. A baseline KAP survey was completed upon enrolment, followed by an online education module on the intrapartum sonographic assessment of head station and position. Afterwards, a second KAP survey was completed. Score were compared using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p<0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 29.0.2.0). RESULTS: A total of 45 midwives were eligible for inclusion and invited to participate. From these, 46.7% (21/45) agreed to take part. Attitudes towards IPUS were positive, as most perceived it as safe, time-efficient, and beneficial for medical-decision making. However, only two midwives (9.1%) sometimes used IPUS themselves during the second stage, whereas none used it during the first stage. A significant improvement in knowledge scores was recorded after the online education module for both the sections on fetal head station (median score 0/5 to 2.75/5, p=0.01) and position (median score 2.5/5 to 3.5/5, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed in the overall attitude scores, as they remained overall positive (4.5/5 to 5/5, p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Although having little experience with IPUS themselves, most participating midwives perceive it as an acceptable, time-efficient, and safe imaging modality. A short online education module resulted in a significant improvement in their knowledge of these topics. Further implementation research is needed to investigate how the uptake of IPUS amongst midwives can be improved, and how this can improve overall labor care.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25001962
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250123102001.0
007      
ta
008      
250117e20241211gr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.18332/ejm/195498 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39664889
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gr
100    1_
$a Packet, Bram $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
245    10
$a Effect of an online teaching module on midwives' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding intrapartum ultrasound: A quasi-experimental approach / $c B. Packet, S. Adela, R. Jute
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS) allows for a more reliable and reproducible assessment of fetal head station and position during labor. This study aimed to investigate how an online education module on IPUS impacts midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding this topic. METHODS: Midwives working in the labor ward of the University Hospital of Leuven (Belgium) were invited to participate in an educational program on IPUS in April 2023. A baseline KAP survey was completed upon enrolment, followed by an online education module on the intrapartum sonographic assessment of head station and position. Afterwards, a second KAP survey was completed. Score were compared using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p<0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 29.0.2.0). RESULTS: A total of 45 midwives were eligible for inclusion and invited to participate. From these, 46.7% (21/45) agreed to take part. Attitudes towards IPUS were positive, as most perceived it as safe, time-efficient, and beneficial for medical-decision making. However, only two midwives (9.1%) sometimes used IPUS themselves during the second stage, whereas none used it during the first stage. A significant improvement in knowledge scores was recorded after the online education module for both the sections on fetal head station (median score 0/5 to 2.75/5, p=0.01) and position (median score 2.5/5 to 3.5/5, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed in the overall attitude scores, as they remained overall positive (4.5/5 to 5/5, p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Although having little experience with IPUS themselves, most participating midwives perceive it as an acceptable, time-efficient, and safe imaging modality. A short online education module resulted in a significant improvement in their knowledge of these topics. Further implementation research is needed to investigate how the uptake of IPUS amongst midwives can be improved, and how this can improve overall labor care.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Adela, Samešová $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $u The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jute, Richter $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
773    0_
$w MED00214241 $t European journal of midwifery $x 2585-2906 $g Roč. 10 (20241211)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39664889 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250117 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250123101955 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2254430 $s 1237965
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 10 $c - $e 20241211 $i 2585-2906 $m European journal of midwifery $n Eur J Midwifery $x MED00214241
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250117

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...