Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Peak systolic blood pressure during preparticipation exercise testing in 12,083 athletes: age, sex, and workload-indexed values and predictors

P. Pesova, B. Jiravska Godula, O. Jiravsky, L. Jelinek, M. Sovova, K. Moravcova, J. Ozana, I. Ranic, R. Neuwirth, R. Miklik, M. Pekar, L. Sknouril, V. Tuka, E. Sovova

. 2024 ; 15 (-) : 1456331. [pub] 20241122

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25002088

AIM: Assessment of blood pressure during exercise is routine in athletes, but normal values remain equivocal. This study examines the response of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to exercise in a large cohort of athletes and establishes normative values by sex and age. METHODS: Competitive athletes free of cardiovascular disease underwent pre-participation exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer. Resting (SBPrest) and peak blood pressure (SBPpeak), heart rate (HRrest and HRpeak), and power output (WR) were recorded. Workload indexed values were calculated. RESULTS: The cohort included 12,083 athletes (median age 15 years, 26.9% female). Median peak exercise SBP was similar between sexes, but WR-indexed measures including SBP/WR ratio and SBP/(WR/kg) slope were higher in females (0.9 vs. 0.7, p < 0.001; 10.94 vs. 9.52, p < 0.001). Univariate analyses revealed significant associations between SBPpeak and several predictors, including sex, age, weight, height, SBPrest, DBPrest, HRrest, HRpeak, and WR (all p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that SBPrest (beta = 0.353, 95% CI [0.541, 0.609], p < 0.001), height (beta = 0.303, 95% CI [0.360, 0.447], p < 0.001), WR (beta = 0.171, 95% CI [0.029, 0.045], p < 0.001), and age (beta = 0.093, 95% CI [0.162, 0.241], p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of SBPpeak. CONCLUSION: This study provides reference values for the interpretation of SBP responses to exercise in athletes. Multivariate analyses highlight the complex interplay of factors influencing peak SBP, including SBPrest, height, WR, age, DBPrest, sex, endurance sport category, and weight. In future studies, these findings may inform the development of personalised training strategies and risk stratification models in athletic populations.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25002088
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250123102033.0
007      
ta
008      
250117e20241122sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fphys.2024.1456331 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39651432
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Pesova, Petra $u Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia
245    10
$a Peak systolic blood pressure during preparticipation exercise testing in 12,083 athletes: age, sex, and workload-indexed values and predictors / $c P. Pesova, B. Jiravska Godula, O. Jiravsky, L. Jelinek, M. Sovova, K. Moravcova, J. Ozana, I. Ranic, R. Neuwirth, R. Miklik, M. Pekar, L. Sknouril, V. Tuka, E. Sovova
520    9_
$a AIM: Assessment of blood pressure during exercise is routine in athletes, but normal values remain equivocal. This study examines the response of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to exercise in a large cohort of athletes and establishes normative values by sex and age. METHODS: Competitive athletes free of cardiovascular disease underwent pre-participation exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer. Resting (SBPrest) and peak blood pressure (SBPpeak), heart rate (HRrest and HRpeak), and power output (WR) were recorded. Workload indexed values were calculated. RESULTS: The cohort included 12,083 athletes (median age 15 years, 26.9% female). Median peak exercise SBP was similar between sexes, but WR-indexed measures including SBP/WR ratio and SBP/(WR/kg) slope were higher in females (0.9 vs. 0.7, p < 0.001; 10.94 vs. 9.52, p < 0.001). Univariate analyses revealed significant associations between SBPpeak and several predictors, including sex, age, weight, height, SBPrest, DBPrest, HRrest, HRpeak, and WR (all p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that SBPrest (beta = 0.353, 95% CI [0.541, 0.609], p < 0.001), height (beta = 0.303, 95% CI [0.360, 0.447], p < 0.001), WR (beta = 0.171, 95% CI [0.029, 0.045], p < 0.001), and age (beta = 0.093, 95% CI [0.162, 0.241], p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of SBPpeak. CONCLUSION: This study provides reference values for the interpretation of SBP responses to exercise in athletes. Multivariate analyses highlight the complex interplay of factors influencing peak SBP, including SBPrest, height, WR, age, DBPrest, sex, endurance sport category, and weight. In future studies, these findings may inform the development of personalised training strategies and risk stratification models in athletic populations.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jiravska Godula, Bogna $u Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia
700    1_
$a Jiravsky, Otakar $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Jelinek, Libor $u Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia
700    1_
$a Sovova, Marketa $u Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia
700    1_
$a Moravcova, Katarina $u Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia
700    1_
$a Ozana, Jaromir $u Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia
700    1_
$a Ranic, Ivan $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
700    1_
$a Neuwirth, Radek $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
700    1_
$a Miklik, Roman $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia
700    1_
$a Pekar, Matej $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Sknouril, Libor $u Sports Cardiology Center, Agel Hospital Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
700    1_
$a Tuka, Vladimir $u Second Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czechia
700    1_
$a Sovova, Eliska $u Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00174601 $t Frontiers in physiology $x 1664-042X $g Roč. 15 (20241122), s. 1456331
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39651432 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250117 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250123102027 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2254471 $s 1238091
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 15 $c - $d 1456331 $e 20241122 $i 1664-042X $m Frontiers in physiology $n Front Physiol $x MED00174601
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250117

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...