Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

No cardiac phase bias for threat-related distance perception under naturalistic conditions in immersive virtual reality

F. Klotzsche, P. Motyka, A. Molak, V. Sahula, B. Darmová, C. Byrnes, I. Fajnerová, M. Gaebler

. 2024 ; 11 (10) : 241072. [pub] 20241030

Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Previous studies have found that threatening stimuli are more readily perceived and more intensely experienced when presented during cardiac systole compared with diastole. Also, threatening stimuli are judged as physically closer than neutral ones. In a pre-registered study, we tested these effects and their interaction using a naturalistic (interactive and three-dimensional) experimental design in immersive virtual reality: we briefly displayed threatening and non-threatening animals (four each) at varying distances (1.5-5.5 m) to a group of young, healthy participants (n = 41) while recording their electrocardiograms (ECGs). Participants then pointed to the location where they had seen the animal (approx. 29 000 trials in total). Our pre-registered analyses indicated that perceived distances to both threatening and non-threatening animals did not differ significantly between cardiac phases-with Bayesian analysis supporting the null hypothesis. There was also no evidence for an association between subjective fear and perceived proximity to threatening animals. These results contrast with previous findings that used verbal or declarative distance measures in less naturalistic experimental conditions. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the cardiac phase-related variation in threat processing may not generalize across different paradigms and may be less relevant in naturalistic scenarios than under more abstract experimental conditions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25002257
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250519153555.0
007      
ta
008      
250117s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1098/rsos.241072 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39479236
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Klotzsche, Felix $u Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany $u Faculty of Philosophy, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339852481
245    10
$a No cardiac phase bias for threat-related distance perception under naturalistic conditions in immersive virtual reality / $c F. Klotzsche, P. Motyka, A. Molak, V. Sahula, B. Darmová, C. Byrnes, I. Fajnerová, M. Gaebler
520    9_
$a Previous studies have found that threatening stimuli are more readily perceived and more intensely experienced when presented during cardiac systole compared with diastole. Also, threatening stimuli are judged as physically closer than neutral ones. In a pre-registered study, we tested these effects and their interaction using a naturalistic (interactive and three-dimensional) experimental design in immersive virtual reality: we briefly displayed threatening and non-threatening animals (four each) at varying distances (1.5-5.5 m) to a group of young, healthy participants (n = 41) while recording their electrocardiograms (ECGs). Participants then pointed to the location where they had seen the animal (approx. 29 000 trials in total). Our pre-registered analyses indicated that perceived distances to both threatening and non-threatening animals did not differ significantly between cardiac phases-with Bayesian analysis supporting the null hypothesis. There was also no evidence for an association between subjective fear and perceived proximity to threatening animals. These results contrast with previous findings that used verbal or declarative distance measures in less naturalistic experimental conditions. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the cardiac phase-related variation in threat processing may not generalize across different paradigms and may be less relevant in naturalistic scenarios than under more abstract experimental conditions.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Motyka, Paweł $u Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Warsaw, Poland $u Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000155755601
700    1_
$a Molak, Aleksander $u Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland $u CausalPython.io, Warsaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Sahula, Václav $u National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Virtual Reality Research in Mental Health and Neuroscience, Klecany, Czechia
700    1_
$a Darmová, Barbora $u National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Virtual Reality Research in Mental Health and Neuroscience, Klecany, Czechia $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000268099583 $7 xx0332365
700    1_
$a Byrnes, Conor $u Faculty of Philosophy, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a Fajnerová, Iveta $u National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Virtual Reality Research in Mental Health and Neuroscience, Klecany, Czechia $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000273993029 $7 xx0225831
700    1_
$a Gaebler, Michael $u Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany $u Faculty of Philosophy, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000244425778
773    0_
$w MED00188140 $t Royal Society open science $x 2054-5703 $g Roč. 11, č. 10 (2024), s. 241072
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39479236 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250117 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250519153555 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2254521 $s 1238260
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 11 $c 10 $d 241072 $e 20241030 $i 2054-5703 $m Royal Society open science $n R Soc Open Sci $x MED00188140
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250117

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...