Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The role of re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with TaHG non muscle invasive bladder cancer

P. Scilipoti, M. Moschini, M. de Angelis, L. Afferi, C. Lonati, M. Longoni, G. Tremolada, P. Zaurito, A. Viti, A. Santangelo, R. Pichler, A. Necchi, F. Montorsi, A. Briganti, A. Mari, W. Krajewski, E. Laukthina, B. Pradere, F. Del Giudice, L....

. 2024 ; 42 (1) : 630. [pub] 20241106

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003507
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: There is lack of evidence regarding the indication for re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT) for Ta high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aims to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with TaHG NMIBC to determine the benefit from performing reTURBT. METHODS: We relied on a multicenter cohort of 317 TaHG NMIBC from 12 centers who underwent TURBT and a subsequent complete Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction from 2009 to 2021. Kaplan Meier analyses estimated recurrence free survival (RFS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to reTURBT. Sub-analyses evaluated PFS in patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT according to international guidelines (multifocality, size > 3 cm, recurrent cancer, carcinoma in situ, lymph vascular invasion, histological variant, incomplete and absence of muscle layer at index TURBT). Multivariable cox-regression analysis predicted recurrence and progression. RESULTS: Of the 317 patients, 123 (39%) underwent reTURBT, while 194 (61%) did not. Residual disease was detected in 46% of cases, with a 3.2% upstaging rate. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year RFS was higher in patients who underwent reTURBT (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in PFS. ReTURBT reduced the risk of recurrence [multivariable hazard ratio: 0.45, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.71]. Among patients who did not undergo reTURBT, those with ≥ 2 risk factors had lower 3-year PFS (73% vs. 92%, p < 0.001) than those with 0-1 risk factor, whereas no difference in 3-year PFS was observed in patients who underwent reTURBT regardless of the number of risk factors (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: ReTURBT demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence among patients with TaHG NMIBC, yet its impact on progression remained uncertain. Our study underscores the importance of adhering to current international guidelines, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT.

Belegarzt für Urologie Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland

Clinica Luganese Moncucco Lugano Switzerland

Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences Sapienza University Umberto 1 Polyclinic Hospital Rome Italy

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology Wrocław Medical University Wroclaw Poland

Department of Urology Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna General Hospital Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland

Department of Urology Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute 1066 CX Amsterdam Netherlands

Department of Urology Puigvert Foundation Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Urology Spedali Civili Hospital University of Brescia Brescia Italy

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology University of Tor Vergata Rome Italy

Department of Urology UROSUD La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Experimental Oncology Unit of Urology URI Urological Research Institute IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute Via Olgettina 60 20132 Milan Italy

Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences Torino School of Medicine Turin Italy

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Sant'Anna Clinic Swiss Medical Group Sorengo Switzerland

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003507
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104401.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00345-024-05342-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39503747
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Scilipoti, Pietro $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
245    14
$a The role of re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with TaHG non muscle invasive bladder cancer / $c P. Scilipoti, M. Moschini, M. de Angelis, L. Afferi, C. Lonati, M. Longoni, G. Tremolada, P. Zaurito, A. Viti, A. Santangelo, R. Pichler, A. Necchi, F. Montorsi, A. Briganti, A. Mari, W. Krajewski, E. Laukthina, B. Pradere, F. Del Giudice, L. Mertens, A. Gallioli, F. Soria, P. Gontero, S. Albisinni, SF. Shariat, R. Carando, European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urothelial carcinoma working group
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: There is lack of evidence regarding the indication for re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT) for Ta high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aims to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with TaHG NMIBC to determine the benefit from performing reTURBT. METHODS: We relied on a multicenter cohort of 317 TaHG NMIBC from 12 centers who underwent TURBT and a subsequent complete Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction from 2009 to 2021. Kaplan Meier analyses estimated recurrence free survival (RFS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to reTURBT. Sub-analyses evaluated PFS in patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT according to international guidelines (multifocality, size > 3 cm, recurrent cancer, carcinoma in situ, lymph vascular invasion, histological variant, incomplete and absence of muscle layer at index TURBT). Multivariable cox-regression analysis predicted recurrence and progression. RESULTS: Of the 317 patients, 123 (39%) underwent reTURBT, while 194 (61%) did not. Residual disease was detected in 46% of cases, with a 3.2% upstaging rate. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year RFS was higher in patients who underwent reTURBT (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in PFS. ReTURBT reduced the risk of recurrence [multivariable hazard ratio: 0.45, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.71]. Among patients who did not undergo reTURBT, those with ≥ 2 risk factors had lower 3-year PFS (73% vs. 92%, p < 0.001) than those with 0-1 risk factor, whereas no difference in 3-year PFS was observed in patients who underwent reTURBT regardless of the number of risk factors (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: ReTURBT demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence among patients with TaHG NMIBC, yet its impact on progression remained uncertain. Our study underscores the importance of adhering to current international guidelines, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D001749
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a cystektomie $x metody $7 D015653
650    12
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a stupeň nádoru $7 D060787
650    _2
$a uretra $7 D014521
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x epidemiologie $7 D009364
650    _2
$a reoperace $7 D012086
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a transuretrální resekce močového měchýře $7 D000094463
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Moschini, Marco $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. moschini.marco@hsr.it
700    1_
$a de Angelis, Mario $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Afferi, Luca $u Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Lonati, Chiara $u Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
700    1_
$a Longoni, Mattia $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Tremolada, Giovanni $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Zaurito, Paolo $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Viti, Alessandro $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Santangelo, Alfonso $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Pichler, Renate $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
700    1_
$a Necchi, Andrea $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Montorsi, Francesco $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Briganti, Alberto $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Mari, Andrea $u Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Krajewski, Wojciech $u Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Laukthina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
700    1_
$a Del Giudice, Francesco $u Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Mertens, Laura $u Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands
700    1_
$a Gallioli, Andrea $u Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Soria, Francesco $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Gontero, Paolo $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Albisinni, Simone $u Department of Urology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Carando, Roberto $u Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland $u Sant'Anna Clinic, Swiss Medical Group, Sorengo, Switzerland $u Belegarzt für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
710    2_
$a European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urothelial carcinoma working group
773    0_
$w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 42, č. 1 (2024), s. 630
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39503747 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104356 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263332 $s 1239514
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 42 $c 1 $d 630 $e 20241106 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...