• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Working conditions during pregnancy: a survey of 3590 European anaesthesiologists and intensivists

M. Zdravkovic, B. Kabon, O. Dow, M. Klincová, F. Bilotta, J. Berger-Estilita, Collaborators

. 2024 ; 133 (5) : 1062-1072. [pub] 20240910

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003663
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Open Access Digital Library od 1995-01-01 do Před 12 měsíci
Elsevier Open Access Journals od 1923-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Elsevier Open Archive Journals od 1923-07-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy adds challenges for healthcare professionals, regardless of gender. We investigated experiences during pregnancy, attitudes towards pregnant colleagues, family planning decisions, and awareness of regulations among European anaesthesiologists and intensivists. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 3590 anaesthesiologists and intensivists from 47 European countries. The survey, available for 12 weeks, collected data on demographics, working conditions, safety perceptions, and the impact of clinical practice and training demands on family planning. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, whereas qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Only 41.4% (n=678) of women were satisfied with their working conditions during pregnancy, and only 38.5% (n=602) considered their working environment safe. The proportion of women who changed their clinical practice during pregnancy and who took sick leave to avoid potentially harmful working conditions increased over time (P<0.001 for both). Men had children more often during residency than women (P<0.001). Pregnant colleagues' safety concerns influenced clinical practice, with women and men who had experience with their own and partner's pregnancy being more likely to modify their practices. Work and training demands discouraged plans to have children, particularly among women, leading to consideration of leaving training. Awareness of national regulations was limited, and respondents highlighted a need for better support and flexible working conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Improved support and working environments for pregnant colleagues and ability to express preferred clinical areas for work are needed. Department heads should commit to safety and family friendliness, and men transitioning to parenthood should not be neglected.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003663
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104607.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.002 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39256092
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Zdravkovic, Marko $u Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
245    10
$a Working conditions during pregnancy: a survey of 3590 European anaesthesiologists and intensivists / $c M. Zdravkovic, B. Kabon, O. Dow, M. Klincová, F. Bilotta, J. Berger-Estilita, Collaborators
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Pregnancy adds challenges for healthcare professionals, regardless of gender. We investigated experiences during pregnancy, attitudes towards pregnant colleagues, family planning decisions, and awareness of regulations among European anaesthesiologists and intensivists. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 3590 anaesthesiologists and intensivists from 47 European countries. The survey, available for 12 weeks, collected data on demographics, working conditions, safety perceptions, and the impact of clinical practice and training demands on family planning. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, whereas qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Only 41.4% (n=678) of women were satisfied with their working conditions during pregnancy, and only 38.5% (n=602) considered their working environment safe. The proportion of women who changed their clinical practice during pregnancy and who took sick leave to avoid potentially harmful working conditions increased over time (P<0.001 for both). Men had children more often during residency than women (P<0.001). Pregnant colleagues' safety concerns influenced clinical practice, with women and men who had experience with their own and partner's pregnancy being more likely to modify their practices. Work and training demands discouraged plans to have children, particularly among women, leading to consideration of leaving training. Awareness of national regulations was limited, and respondents highlighted a need for better support and flexible working conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Improved support and working environments for pregnant colleagues and ability to express preferred clinical areas for work are needed. Department heads should commit to safety and family friendliness, and men transitioning to parenthood should not be neglected.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a anesteziologové $7 D000072080
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a postoj zdravotnického personálu $7 D001291
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pracoviště $x psychologie $7 D017132
650    _2
$a pracovní podmínky $7 D000092922
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kabon, Barbara $u Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Dow, Olivia $u Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
700    1_
$a Klincová, Martina $u Academic Centre for Malignant Hyperthermia, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bilotta, Federico $u Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: bilotta@tiscali.it
700    1_
$a Berger-Estilita, Joana $u Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Brussels, Belgium
710    2_
$a Collaborators
773    0_
$w MED00000855 $t British journal of anaesthesia $x 1471-6771 $g Roč. 133, č. 5 (2024), s. 1062-1072
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39256092 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104603 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263426 $s 1239670
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 133 $c 5 $d 1062-1072 $e 20240910 $i 1471-6771 $m British journal of anaesthesia $n Br J Anaesth $x MED00000855
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...