Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Is Extensor Indicis Proprius Tendon Transfer an Innocent Surgical Procedure for the Restoration of Extensor Pollicis Longus Function [Je přenos šlachy extensor indicis proprius nevinným chirurgickým zákrokem pro obnovení funkce extensor pollicis longus]

K. Uzel, F. Aydin, ZM. Asfuroğlu, E. Gümüşoğlu, MM. Eskandari

. 2024 ; 91 (6) : 364-368. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25005467

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study to evaluate the subjective and objective results of Extensor indicis proprius (EIP) to extensor pollicis longus (EPL) transfer with an emphasis on donor site morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 17 patients (59% men, 41% women) who underwent EIP-EPL transfer were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 43 (9-64) years, and the mean follow-up was 72 (19-124) months. The extensor strengths were measured according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scoring system. Nail tip-table surface distance (NTD) was measured to evaluate extension loss, and pulp-palm distance (PPD) to evaluate thumb flexion-adduction limitation. Grip and key pinch strengths were measured and corrected regarding the dominance and compared with those of the non-operated side. Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) and satisfaction scores of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Donor site morbidity was detected in 6 patients (35%). The extension strength of the index finger was found to be significantly lower than the non-operative side (p<0.05). Thumb mean NTD and PPD values were 6.8 (0-50) and 2.9 (0-20) mm, respectively. The index finger mean NTD was 0.6 (0-10) mm. The grip strength was 86% (43%-100%) and the pinch strength was 82% (31-100%) of the expected strengths. Compared to the preoperative period, there was a significant decrease in the QDASH score (p <0.05). Postoperative QDASH scores of patients with donor site morbidity were significantly higher than those without (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients are generally satisfied with the EIP-EPL transfer results, the permanent morbidity rate in the index finger is high. Therefore, alternatives other than EIP should be considered for transfer to EPL in individuals whose occupation requires complete and strong index finger extension. KEY WORDS: extensor pollicis longus, neglected tendon laceration, extensor indicis proprius, tendon transfer, donor site morbidity.

Je přenos šlachy extensor indicis proprius nevinným chirurgickým zákrokem pro obnovení funkce extensor pollicis longus

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25005467
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250227142522.0
007      
ta
008      
250213s2024 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/ACHOT2024/039 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39781637
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Uzel, K. $u Medipol Mega University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Hand Surgery, Bağcılar/İstanbul, Turkey
245    10
$a Is Extensor Indicis Proprius Tendon Transfer an Innocent Surgical Procedure for the Restoration of Extensor Pollicis Longus Function / $c K. Uzel, F. Aydin, ZM. Asfuroğlu, E. Gümüşoğlu, MM. Eskandari
246    31
$a Je přenos šlachy extensor indicis proprius nevinným chirurgickým zákrokem pro obnovení funkce extensor pollicis longus
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study to evaluate the subjective and objective results of Extensor indicis proprius (EIP) to extensor pollicis longus (EPL) transfer with an emphasis on donor site morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 17 patients (59% men, 41% women) who underwent EIP-EPL transfer were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 43 (9-64) years, and the mean follow-up was 72 (19-124) months. The extensor strengths were measured according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scoring system. Nail tip-table surface distance (NTD) was measured to evaluate extension loss, and pulp-palm distance (PPD) to evaluate thumb flexion-adduction limitation. Grip and key pinch strengths were measured and corrected regarding the dominance and compared with those of the non-operated side. Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) and satisfaction scores of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Donor site morbidity was detected in 6 patients (35%). The extension strength of the index finger was found to be significantly lower than the non-operative side (p<0.05). Thumb mean NTD and PPD values were 6.8 (0-50) and 2.9 (0-20) mm, respectively. The index finger mean NTD was 0.6 (0-10) mm. The grip strength was 86% (43%-100%) and the pinch strength was 82% (31-100%) of the expected strengths. Compared to the preoperative period, there was a significant decrease in the QDASH score (p <0.05). Postoperative QDASH scores of patients with donor site morbidity were significantly higher than those without (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients are generally satisfied with the EIP-EPL transfer results, the permanent morbidity rate in the index finger is high. Therefore, alternatives other than EIP should be considered for transfer to EPL in individuals whose occupation requires complete and strong index finger extension. KEY WORDS: extensor pollicis longus, neglected tendon laceration, extensor indicis proprius, tendon transfer, donor site morbidity.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a přenos šlachy $x metody $7 D013709
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a síla ruky $x fyziologie $7 D018737
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a palec ruky $x chirurgie $x fyziologie $7 D013933
650    _2
$a rozsah kloubních pohybů $7 D016059
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Aydin, F. $u Gölköy State Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ordu, Turkey
700    1_
$a Asfuroğlu, Z. M. $u University of Mersin, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Hand Surgery, Mersin, Turkey
700    1_
$a Gümüşoğlu, E. $u University of Mersin, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Hand Surgery, Mersin, Turkey
700    1_
$a Eskandari, M. M. $u University of Mersin, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Hand Surgery, Mersin, Turkey
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 91, č. 6 (2024), s. 364-368
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39781637 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20250213 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250227142516 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2275709 $s 1242487
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 91 $c 6 $d 364-368 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $n Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20250213

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...