-
Something wrong with this record ?
Výsledky osteosyntézy intraartikulárních zlomenin distálního femuru retrográdním femorálním hřebem
[Outcomes of Retrograde Femoral Nail Osteosynthesis of Intraarticular Fractures of the Distal Femur]
J. Zeman, J. Zeman, P. Korpa, T. Matějka, P. Zeman, J. Matějka
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
Document type English Abstract, Journal Article
PubMed
39781634
DOI
10.55095/achot2024/044
- MeSH
- Femoral Fractures * surgery MeSH
- Intra-Articular Fractures surgery MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary methods instrumentation MeSH
- Bone Nails * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Postoperative Complications etiology MeSH
- Reoperation methods MeSH
- Range of Motion, Articular MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Internal methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- English Abstract MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Intraarticular fractures of the distal femur rank among the most severe musculoskeletal injuries. Various treatment options, such as plate osteosynthesis or retrograde nailing, can be employed. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of intraarticular distal femoral fractures treated with retrograde femoral nail, with particular emphasis on C3 fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2016 and January 2023, 18 AO/33.C3 fractures were treated with a retrograde femoral nail. Of these, two were classified as 33.C1, eight as 33.C2 and eight as 33.C3. Twelve of the fractures were open. After the initial treatment and stabilizing the patient's overall condition, we proceeded with the definitive osteosynthesis. The first phase involved open reduction and fixation using individual screws to reconstruct the articular surface. The second phase consisted in retrograde nailing with correction of the length, axis and rotation of the femur. The evaluation criteria included: complication rate, number of revisions, knee range of motion, mechanical axis and length of the lower extremity, progression of gonarthrosis, pain level, need of walking support, Lysholm and Tegner Activity Score for functional outcome. RESULTS: Overall, we evaluated the complications and the outcomes of 12 patients (13 fractures). Of these, 8 patients experienced some kind of postoperative complications, primarily insufficient healing or nonunion, which were managed through revision surgery. Plate reosteosynthesis was used in 2 patients who were then excluded from the final clinical evaluation. No cases of deep infection or deep vein thrombosis were reported and no patient required total knee replacement. Seven AO/33.C3 fractures were individually evaluated. The average knee range of motion was nearly 0-93°, maximum flexion was 120°. On average, the lower extremity was 1.6 cm shorter and 7.3° varus to the mechanical axis. Only little progression of gonarthrosis was observed along with low levels of pain. The Lysholm Score ranged between 52 and 84 points (averaging 73.1). The mean Tegner Activity Score was 3.4. All results showed adequate improvement in 33.C2 and 33.C1 groups. DISCUSSION: The retrograde femoral nail demonstrates several advantages over the locking compression plate, particularly in biomechanical aspects. Various clinical studies have reported superior outcomes in terms of healing, complication rate, blood loss and functional outcome. Our study findings align with some of those international studies, particularly in the rate of infectious complications (0%), mean Lysholm Score (79.3 p.) and Tegner Activity Score (4.1). On the other hand, we observed a higher rate of revision surgery (53.8 %), mainly due to evaluating 33.C fractures only. The main advantage of this method lies in complete visualization, leading to better reconstruction of the articular surface coupled with excellent biomechanical properties of the intramedullary nail. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarticular distal femoral fractures pose significant challenges to treatment and frequently lead to permanent damage. The primary treatment goals involve achieving anatomical reposition of the articular surface, stable osteosynthesis, correction of the femoral length and axis and early rehabilitation. Our study demonstrates good clinical outcomes with a relatively low rate of complications. Patients are capable of walking without pain, achieving a good range of motion, returning to their occupations and becoming self-sufficient. Moreover, there were no infectious complications and no significant progression of gonarthrosis. KEY WORDS: retrograde femoral nail, intraarticular distal femoral fracture, functional outcome, complication rate.
Outcomes of Retrograde Femoral Nail Osteosynthesis of Intraarticular Fractures of the Distal Femur
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25005470
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250306094547.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250213s2024 xr a f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.55095/ACHOT2024/044 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39781634
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Zeman, Jan $u Klinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohybového ústrojí Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň $7 xx0329832
- 245 10
- $a Výsledky osteosyntézy intraartikulárních zlomenin distálního femuru retrográdním femorálním hřebem / $c J. Zeman, J. Zeman, P. Korpa, T. Matějka, P. Zeman, J. Matějka
- 246 31
- $a [Outcomes of Retrograde Femoral Nail Osteosynthesis of Intraarticular Fractures of the Distal Femur]
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Intraarticular fractures of the distal femur rank among the most severe musculoskeletal injuries. Various treatment options, such as plate osteosynthesis or retrograde nailing, can be employed. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of intraarticular distal femoral fractures treated with retrograde femoral nail, with particular emphasis on C3 fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2016 and January 2023, 18 AO/33.C3 fractures were treated with a retrograde femoral nail. Of these, two were classified as 33.C1, eight as 33.C2 and eight as 33.C3. Twelve of the fractures were open. After the initial treatment and stabilizing the patient's overall condition, we proceeded with the definitive osteosynthesis. The first phase involved open reduction and fixation using individual screws to reconstruct the articular surface. The second phase consisted in retrograde nailing with correction of the length, axis and rotation of the femur. The evaluation criteria included: complication rate, number of revisions, knee range of motion, mechanical axis and length of the lower extremity, progression of gonarthrosis, pain level, need of walking support, Lysholm and Tegner Activity Score for functional outcome. RESULTS: Overall, we evaluated the complications and the outcomes of 12 patients (13 fractures). Of these, 8 patients experienced some kind of postoperative complications, primarily insufficient healing or nonunion, which were managed through revision surgery. Plate reosteosynthesis was used in 2 patients who were then excluded from the final clinical evaluation. No cases of deep infection or deep vein thrombosis were reported and no patient required total knee replacement. Seven AO/33.C3 fractures were individually evaluated. The average knee range of motion was nearly 0-93°, maximum flexion was 120°. On average, the lower extremity was 1.6 cm shorter and 7.3° varus to the mechanical axis. Only little progression of gonarthrosis was observed along with low levels of pain. The Lysholm Score ranged between 52 and 84 points (averaging 73.1). The mean Tegner Activity Score was 3.4. All results showed adequate improvement in 33.C2 and 33.C1 groups. DISCUSSION: The retrograde femoral nail demonstrates several advantages over the locking compression plate, particularly in biomechanical aspects. Various clinical studies have reported superior outcomes in terms of healing, complication rate, blood loss and functional outcome. Our study findings align with some of those international studies, particularly in the rate of infectious complications (0%), mean Lysholm Score (79.3 p.) and Tegner Activity Score (4.1). On the other hand, we observed a higher rate of revision surgery (53.8 %), mainly due to evaluating 33.C fractures only. The main advantage of this method lies in complete visualization, leading to better reconstruction of the articular surface coupled with excellent biomechanical properties of the intramedullary nail. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarticular distal femoral fractures pose significant challenges to treatment and frequently lead to permanent damage. The primary treatment goals involve achieving anatomical reposition of the articular surface, stable osteosynthesis, correction of the femoral length and axis and early rehabilitation. Our study demonstrates good clinical outcomes with a relatively low rate of complications. Patients are capable of walking without pain, achieving a good range of motion, returning to their occupations and becoming self-sufficient. Moreover, there were no infectious complications and no significant progression of gonarthrosis. KEY WORDS: retrograde femoral nail, intraarticular distal femoral fracture, functional outcome, complication rate.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fraktury femuru $x chirurgie $7 D005264
- 650 12
- $a kostní hřeby $7 D001858
- 650 _2
- $a intraartikulární fraktury $x chirurgie $7 D057072
- 650 _2
- $a rozsah kloubních pohybů $7 D016059
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a intramedulární fixace fraktury $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D005594
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x metody $7 D005593
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $x metody $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 655 _2
- $a anglický abstrakt $7 D004740
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zeman, Jaroslav, $u Klinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohybového ústrojí Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň $d 1966- $7 xx0074469
- 700 1_
- $a Korpa, Pavel, $u Klinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohybového ústrojí Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň $d 1986- $7 xx0258420
- 700 1_
- $a Matějka, Tomáš $u Klinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohybového ústrojí Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň $7 xx0241979
- 700 1_
- $a Zeman, Petr, $u Klinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohybového ústrojí Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň $d 1977- $7 xx0101647
- 700 1_
- $a Matějka, Jiří, $u Klinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohybového ústrojí Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň $d 1959- $7 mzk2008464060
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 91, č. 6 (2024), s. 339-347
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39781634 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250213 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250306094556 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2275712 $s 1242490
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 91 $c 6 $d 339-347 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $n Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20250213