-
Something wrong with this record ?
Analysis of PEST Questionnaire Responses in Patients with Psoriasis in Daily Practice: Results from a Single-Center of Psoriasis in the Czech Republic
S. Tivadar, J. Hugo, K. Fuzesiová, T. Doležal, B. Turková, S. Gkalpakiotis
Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
Cooperatio 34
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Internal Disciplines
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2011
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2011
Springer Journals Complete - Open Access
from 2011-09-01
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2011-09-01
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects 10-30% of individuals with psoriasis. Early detection of PsA is crucial to prevent potential irreversible joint damage. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) has proven to be an effective tool in daily clinical practice, but limited data is available on the analysis of positive responses. Our study aimed to determine the combination of positive responses to individual questions and characterize patients with positive PEST results based on specific anatomical sites of psoriasis, duration of the disease, and epidemiological parameters that could potentially predict PEST positivity. METHODS: The PEST questionnaire was randomly administered to patients with psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis attending the outpatient unit for psoriasis treatment. A total of 351 patients completed the PEST questionnaire over a 24-month period. Patients undergoing various types of therapy were included. Each patient completed the PEST questionnaire once, and epidemiological data (such as age, weight, height, body mass index, smoking status, age of disease onset, disease duration, and family history of psoriasis) were collected, as well as types of therapy. RESULTS: We included 242 men and 109 women with an average age of 49.4 years and duration of psoriasis of 23.3 years. A positive PEST questionnaire result was found in 28.5% of patients; 13.1% had a score of 3, 8.0% a score of 4 and 7.4% a score of 5. Nail psoriasis, higher age, and therapy with biological/targeted therapy were associated with PEST positivity. The most frequently observed positive response was nail involvement. CONCLUSION: The PEST questionnaire is a well-established screening tool for identifying patients at risk of having undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis in daily dermatological practice. Patients with nail involvement, higher age, or treated with modern systemic therapy should be closely monitored, as these factors indicate a higher risk of a positive PEST result and consequently higher risk of having psoriatic arthritis.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25008153
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250422095756.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250408s2025 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s13555-025-01374-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40032792
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Tivadar, Simona $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Analysis of PEST Questionnaire Responses in Patients with Psoriasis in Daily Practice: Results from a Single-Center of Psoriasis in the Czech Republic / $c S. Tivadar, J. Hugo, K. Fuzesiová, T. Doležal, B. Turková, S. Gkalpakiotis
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects 10-30% of individuals with psoriasis. Early detection of PsA is crucial to prevent potential irreversible joint damage. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) has proven to be an effective tool in daily clinical practice, but limited data is available on the analysis of positive responses. Our study aimed to determine the combination of positive responses to individual questions and characterize patients with positive PEST results based on specific anatomical sites of psoriasis, duration of the disease, and epidemiological parameters that could potentially predict PEST positivity. METHODS: The PEST questionnaire was randomly administered to patients with psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis attending the outpatient unit for psoriasis treatment. A total of 351 patients completed the PEST questionnaire over a 24-month period. Patients undergoing various types of therapy were included. Each patient completed the PEST questionnaire once, and epidemiological data (such as age, weight, height, body mass index, smoking status, age of disease onset, disease duration, and family history of psoriasis) were collected, as well as types of therapy. RESULTS: We included 242 men and 109 women with an average age of 49.4 years and duration of psoriasis of 23.3 years. A positive PEST questionnaire result was found in 28.5% of patients; 13.1% had a score of 3, 8.0% a score of 4 and 7.4% a score of 5. Nail psoriasis, higher age, and therapy with biological/targeted therapy were associated with PEST positivity. The most frequently observed positive response was nail involvement. CONCLUSION: The PEST questionnaire is a well-established screening tool for identifying patients at risk of having undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis in daily dermatological practice. Patients with nail involvement, higher age, or treated with modern systemic therapy should be closely monitored, as these factors indicate a higher risk of a positive PEST result and consequently higher risk of having psoriatic arthritis.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hugo, Jan $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000348402642
- 700 1_
- $a Fuzesiová, Kristína $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Doležal, Tomáš $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Turková, Barbora $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Gkalpakiotis, Spyridon $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. spyros@centrum.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000269565961 $7 xx0094696
- 773 0_
- $w MED00207103 $t Dermatology and therapy $x 2193-8210 $g Roč. 15, č. 4 (2025), s. 819-829
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40032792 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250422095757 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2306286 $s 1245228
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 15 $c 4 $d 819-829 $e 20250303 $i 2193-8210 $m Dermatology and therapy $n Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) $x MED00207103
- GRA __
- $a Cooperatio 34 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
- GRA __
- $a Internal Disciplines $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250408