Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Analysis of PEST Questionnaire Responses in Patients with Psoriasis in Daily Practice: Results from a Single-Center of Psoriasis in the Czech Republic

S. Tivadar, J. Hugo, K. Fuzesiová, T. Doležal, B. Turková, S. Gkalpakiotis

. 2025 ; 15 (4) : 819-829. [pub] 20250303

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
Cooperatio 34 Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Internal Disciplines Univerzita Karlova v Praze

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects 10-30% of individuals with psoriasis. Early detection of PsA is crucial to prevent potential irreversible joint damage. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) has proven to be an effective tool in daily clinical practice, but limited data is available on the analysis of positive responses. Our study aimed to determine the combination of positive responses to individual questions and characterize patients with positive PEST results based on specific anatomical sites of psoriasis, duration of the disease, and epidemiological parameters that could potentially predict PEST positivity. METHODS: The PEST questionnaire was randomly administered to patients with psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis attending the outpatient unit for psoriasis treatment. A total of 351 patients completed the PEST questionnaire over a 24-month period. Patients undergoing various types of therapy were included. Each patient completed the PEST questionnaire once, and epidemiological data (such as age, weight, height, body mass index, smoking status, age of disease onset, disease duration, and family history of psoriasis) were collected, as well as types of therapy. RESULTS: We included 242 men and 109 women with an average age of 49.4 years and duration of psoriasis of 23.3 years. A positive PEST questionnaire result was found in 28.5% of patients; 13.1% had a score of 3, 8.0% a score of 4 and 7.4% a score of 5. Nail psoriasis, higher age, and therapy with biological/targeted therapy were associated with PEST positivity. The most frequently observed positive response was nail involvement. CONCLUSION: The PEST questionnaire is a well-established screening tool for identifying patients at risk of having undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis in daily dermatological practice. Patients with nail involvement, higher age, or treated with modern systemic therapy should be closely monitored, as these factors indicate a higher risk of a positive PEST result and consequently higher risk of having psoriatic arthritis.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25008153
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250422095756.0
007      
ta
008      
250408s2025 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s13555-025-01374-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40032792
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Tivadar, Simona $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Analysis of PEST Questionnaire Responses in Patients with Psoriasis in Daily Practice: Results from a Single-Center of Psoriasis in the Czech Republic / $c S. Tivadar, J. Hugo, K. Fuzesiová, T. Doležal, B. Turková, S. Gkalpakiotis
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects 10-30% of individuals with psoriasis. Early detection of PsA is crucial to prevent potential irreversible joint damage. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) has proven to be an effective tool in daily clinical practice, but limited data is available on the analysis of positive responses. Our study aimed to determine the combination of positive responses to individual questions and characterize patients with positive PEST results based on specific anatomical sites of psoriasis, duration of the disease, and epidemiological parameters that could potentially predict PEST positivity. METHODS: The PEST questionnaire was randomly administered to patients with psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis attending the outpatient unit for psoriasis treatment. A total of 351 patients completed the PEST questionnaire over a 24-month period. Patients undergoing various types of therapy were included. Each patient completed the PEST questionnaire once, and epidemiological data (such as age, weight, height, body mass index, smoking status, age of disease onset, disease duration, and family history of psoriasis) were collected, as well as types of therapy. RESULTS: We included 242 men and 109 women with an average age of 49.4 years and duration of psoriasis of 23.3 years. A positive PEST questionnaire result was found in 28.5% of patients; 13.1% had a score of 3, 8.0% a score of 4 and 7.4% a score of 5. Nail psoriasis, higher age, and therapy with biological/targeted therapy were associated with PEST positivity. The most frequently observed positive response was nail involvement. CONCLUSION: The PEST questionnaire is a well-established screening tool for identifying patients at risk of having undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis in daily dermatological practice. Patients with nail involvement, higher age, or treated with modern systemic therapy should be closely monitored, as these factors indicate a higher risk of a positive PEST result and consequently higher risk of having psoriatic arthritis.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hugo, Jan $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000348402642
700    1_
$a Fuzesiová, Kristína $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Doležal, Tomáš $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Turková, Barbora $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gkalpakiotis, Spyridon $u Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. spyros@centrum.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000269565961 $7 xx0094696
773    0_
$w MED00207103 $t Dermatology and therapy $x 2193-8210 $g Roč. 15, č. 4 (2025), s. 819-829
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40032792 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250422095757 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2306286 $s 1245228
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 15 $c 4 $d 819-829 $e 20250303 $i 2193-8210 $m Dermatology and therapy $n Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) $x MED00207103
GRA    __
$a Cooperatio 34 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
GRA    __
$a Internal Disciplines $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250408

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...