Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Adrenaline has a limited effect on myocardial microvascular blood flow: A randomised experimental study in a porcine cardiac arrest model

H. Wagner, M. Mlček, P. Krupičková, M. Popkova, A. Mejstrik, T. Boucek, P. Michálek, O. Kittnar, J. Belohlavek

. 2025 ; 22 (-) : 100893. [pub] 20250204

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25008305

BACKGROUND: Adrenaline (ADR) is a cornerstone of advanced life support (ALS) in cardiac arrest (CA), although its neurologically favourable survival outcomes remain unclear. ADR increases coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), with levels >15 mmHg associated with successful defibrillation. This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between ADR, myocardial microvascular blood flow, and resuscitation outcomes using a porcine CA model simulating refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). METHODS: This study involved 24 domestic pigs. After instrumentation, intubation, and baseline measurements, the animals were randomised into the ADR or control (saline) groups. VF was induced, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated using continuous mechanical chest compressions and ventilation. ADR or saline was administered following ALS guidelines. After 21 min of ALS, defibrillation was performed. Continuous measurements of arterial and venous blood pressures using an electrocardiogram and index of myocardial resistance (IMR) and transit mean time (Tmn) 1 min before and after each injection or peak blood pressure were recorded and compared between the groups. CPP-IMR, amplitude spectrum area (AMSA)-IMR, CPP-Tmn, and AMSA-Tmn correlations were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with six animals in the control group, three in the ADR group achieved a return of spontaneous circulation. No difference was observed in IMR or AMSA; however, significant increases in CPP and arterial end-diastolic blood pressure were observed at several time points. Tmn differed between groups only at two time points. CONCLUSION: Repeated ADR doses during prolonged ALS simulating refractory VF did not improve myocardial microvascular blood flow, as measured using IMR, despite leading to an increase in CPP.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25008305
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250422095805.0
007      
ta
008      
250408e20250204ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100893 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40034872
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Wagner, Henrik $u Department of Cardiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden $u Clinical Sciences, Section II, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden
245    10
$a Adrenaline has a limited effect on myocardial microvascular blood flow: A randomised experimental study in a porcine cardiac arrest model / $c H. Wagner, M. Mlček, P. Krupičková, M. Popkova, A. Mejstrik, T. Boucek, P. Michálek, O. Kittnar, J. Belohlavek
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Adrenaline (ADR) is a cornerstone of advanced life support (ALS) in cardiac arrest (CA), although its neurologically favourable survival outcomes remain unclear. ADR increases coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), with levels >15 mmHg associated with successful defibrillation. This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between ADR, myocardial microvascular blood flow, and resuscitation outcomes using a porcine CA model simulating refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). METHODS: This study involved 24 domestic pigs. After instrumentation, intubation, and baseline measurements, the animals were randomised into the ADR or control (saline) groups. VF was induced, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated using continuous mechanical chest compressions and ventilation. ADR or saline was administered following ALS guidelines. After 21 min of ALS, defibrillation was performed. Continuous measurements of arterial and venous blood pressures using an electrocardiogram and index of myocardial resistance (IMR) and transit mean time (Tmn) 1 min before and after each injection or peak blood pressure were recorded and compared between the groups. CPP-IMR, amplitude spectrum area (AMSA)-IMR, CPP-Tmn, and AMSA-Tmn correlations were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with six animals in the control group, three in the ADR group achieved a return of spontaneous circulation. No difference was observed in IMR or AMSA; however, significant increases in CPP and arterial end-diastolic blood pressure were observed at several time points. Tmn differed between groups only at two time points. CONCLUSION: Repeated ADR doses during prolonged ALS simulating refractory VF did not improve myocardial microvascular blood flow, as measured using IMR, despite leading to an increase in CPP.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mlček, Mikuláš $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Krupičková, Petra $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Popkova, Michaela $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mejstrik, Alan $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Boucek, Tomas $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Michálek, Pavel $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kittnar, Otomar $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Belohlavek, Jan $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic $u The Second Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute for Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
773    0_
$w MED00209367 $t Resuscitation plus $x 2666-5204 $g Roč. 22 (20250204), s. 100893
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40034872 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250422095806 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2306332 $s 1245380
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 22 $c - $d 100893 $e 20250204 $i 2666-5204 $m Resuscitation plus $n Resusc Plus $x MED00209367
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace