Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Large language models for pretreatment education in pediatric radiation oncology: A comparative evaluation study

D. Wawrzuta, A. Napieralska, K. Ludwikowska, L. Jaruševičius, A. Trofimoviča-Krasnorucka, G. Rausis, A. Szulc, K. Pędziwiatr, K. Poláchová, J. Klejdysz, M. Chojnacka

. 2025 ; 51 (-) : 100914. [pub] 20250106

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25008325

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pediatric radiotherapy patients and their parents are usually aware of their need for radiotherapy early on, but they meet with a radiation oncologist later in their treatment. Consequently, they search for information online, often encountering unreliable sources. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to serve as an educational pretreatment tool, providing reliable answers to their questions. We aimed to evaluate the responses provided by generative pre-trained transformers (GPT), the most popular subgroup of LLMs, to questions about pediatric radiation oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected pretreatment questions regarding radiotherapy from patients and parents. Responses were generated using GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and fine-tuned GPT-3.5, with fine-tuning based on pediatric radiotherapy guides from various institutions. Additionally, a radiation oncologist prepared answers to these questions. Finally, a multi-institutional group of nine pediatric radiotherapy experts conducted a blind review of responses, assessing reliability, concision, and comprehensibility. RESULTS: The radiation oncologist and GPT-4 provided the highest-quality responses, though GPT-4's answers were often excessively verbose. While fine-tuned GPT-3.5 generally outperformed basic GPT-3.5, it often provided overly simplistic answers. Inadequate responses were rare, occurring in 4% of GPT-generated responses across all models, primarily due to GPT-3.5 generating excessively long responses. CONCLUSIONS: LLMs can be valuable tools for educating patients and their families before treatment in pediatric radiation oncology. Among them, only GPT-4 provides information of a quality comparable to that of a radiation oncologist, although it still occasionally generates poor-quality responses. GPT-3.5 models should be used cautiously, as they are more likely to produce inadequate answers to patient questions.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25008325
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20251126124249.0
007      
ta
008      
250408e20250106ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100914 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39867725
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Wawrzuta, Dominik $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034 Warsaw, Poland
245    10
$a Large language models for pretreatment education in pediatric radiation oncology: A comparative evaluation study / $c D. Wawrzuta, A. Napieralska, K. Ludwikowska, L. Jaruševičius, A. Trofimoviča-Krasnorucka, G. Rausis, A. Szulc, K. Pędziwiatr, K. Poláchová, J. Klejdysz, M. Chojnacka
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pediatric radiotherapy patients and their parents are usually aware of their need for radiotherapy early on, but they meet with a radiation oncologist later in their treatment. Consequently, they search for information online, often encountering unreliable sources. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to serve as an educational pretreatment tool, providing reliable answers to their questions. We aimed to evaluate the responses provided by generative pre-trained transformers (GPT), the most popular subgroup of LLMs, to questions about pediatric radiation oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected pretreatment questions regarding radiotherapy from patients and parents. Responses were generated using GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and fine-tuned GPT-3.5, with fine-tuning based on pediatric radiotherapy guides from various institutions. Additionally, a radiation oncologist prepared answers to these questions. Finally, a multi-institutional group of nine pediatric radiotherapy experts conducted a blind review of responses, assessing reliability, concision, and comprehensibility. RESULTS: The radiation oncologist and GPT-4 provided the highest-quality responses, though GPT-4's answers were often excessively verbose. While fine-tuned GPT-3.5 generally outperformed basic GPT-3.5, it often provided overly simplistic answers. Inadequate responses were rare, occurring in 4% of GPT-generated responses across all models, primarily due to GPT-3.5 generating excessively long responses. CONCLUSIONS: LLMs can be valuable tools for educating patients and their families before treatment in pediatric radiation oncology. Among them, only GPT-4 provides information of a quality comparable to that of a radiation oncologist, although it still occasionally generates poor-quality responses. GPT-3.5 models should be used cautiously, as they are more likely to produce inadequate answers to patient questions.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Napieralska, Aleksandra $u Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland $u Department of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Garncarska 11, 31-115 Cracow, Poland $u Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705 Cracow, Poland
700    1_
$a Ludwikowska, Katarzyna $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034 Warsaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Jaruševičius, Laimonas $u Oncology Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickevičiaus g. 9, LT-44307, Kaunas, Lithuania
700    1_
$a Trofimoviča-Krasnorucka, Anastasija $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Riga East University Hospital, Hipokrāta iela 2, LV-1038 Riga, Latvia $u Department of Internal Diseases, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
700    1_
$a Rausis, Gints $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Riga East University Hospital, Hipokrāta iela 2, LV-1038 Riga, Latvia
700    1_
$a Szulc, Agata $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Lower Silesian Center of Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology, Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Pędziwiatr, Katarzyna $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034 Warsaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Poláchová, Kateřina $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0280867
700    1_
$a Klejdysz, Justyna $u Department of Economics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany $u ifo Institute, Poschinger Straße 5, 81679 Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Chojnacka, Marzanna $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034 Warsaw, Poland
773    0_
$w MED00213969 $t Clinical and translational radiation oncology $x 2405-6308 $g Roč. 51 (20250106), s. 100914
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39867725 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20251126124235 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2306340 $s 1245400
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 51 $c - $d 100914 $e 20250106 $i 2405-6308 $m Clinical and translational radiation oncology $n Clin Transl Radiat Oncol $x MED00213969
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...