-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
What can neurofeedback and transcranial alternating current stimulation reveal about cross-frequency coupling
M. Orendáčová, E. Kvašňák
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2007
Free Medical Journals
od 2007
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 2007-11-01
PubMed Central
od 2007
Europe PubMed Central
od 2007
ProQuest Central
od 2023-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2007-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2007-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2007
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
In recent years, the dynamics and function of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) in electroencephalography (EEG) have emerged as a prevalent area of investigation within the research community. One possible approach in studying CFC is to utilize non-invasive neuromodulation methods such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and neurofeedback (NFB). In this study, we address (1) the potential applicability of single and multifrequency tACS and NFB protocols in CFC research; (2) the prevalence of CFC types, such as phase-amplitude or amplitude-amplitude CFC, in tACS and NFB studies; and (3) factors that contribute to inter- and intraindividual variability in CFC and ways to address them potentially. Here we analyzed research studies on CFC, tACS, and neurofeedback. Based on current knowledge, CFC types have been reported in tACS and NFB studies. We hypothesize that direct and indirect effects of tACS and neurofeedback can induce CFC. Several variability factors such as health status, age, fatigue, personality traits, and eyes-closed (EC) vs. eyes-open (EO)condition may influence the CFC types. Modifying the duration of the tACS and neurofeedback intervention and selecting a specific demographic experimental group could reduce these sources of CFC variability. Neurofeedback and tACS appear to be promising tools for studying CFC.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25008437
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250422095627.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250408e20250212sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fnins.2025.1465773 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40012676
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Orendáčová, Mária $u Department of Medical Biophysics and Medical Informatics, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a What can neurofeedback and transcranial alternating current stimulation reveal about cross-frequency coupling / $c M. Orendáčová, E. Kvašňák
- 520 9_
- $a In recent years, the dynamics and function of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) in electroencephalography (EEG) have emerged as a prevalent area of investigation within the research community. One possible approach in studying CFC is to utilize non-invasive neuromodulation methods such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and neurofeedback (NFB). In this study, we address (1) the potential applicability of single and multifrequency tACS and NFB protocols in CFC research; (2) the prevalence of CFC types, such as phase-amplitude or amplitude-amplitude CFC, in tACS and NFB studies; and (3) factors that contribute to inter- and intraindividual variability in CFC and ways to address them potentially. Here we analyzed research studies on CFC, tACS, and neurofeedback. Based on current knowledge, CFC types have been reported in tACS and NFB studies. We hypothesize that direct and indirect effects of tACS and neurofeedback can induce CFC. Several variability factors such as health status, age, fatigue, personality traits, and eyes-closed (EC) vs. eyes-open (EO)condition may influence the CFC types. Modifying the duration of the tACS and neurofeedback intervention and selecting a specific demographic experimental group could reduce these sources of CFC variability. Neurofeedback and tACS appear to be promising tools for studying CFC.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kvašňák, Eugen $u Department of Medical Biophysics and Medical Informatics, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00163313 $t Frontiers in neuroscience $x 1662-4548 $g Roč. 19 (20250212), s. 1465773
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40012676 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250422095629 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2306375 $s 1245512
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 19 $c - $d 1465773 $e 20250212 $i 1662-4548 $m Frontiers in neuroscience $n Front Neurosci $x MED00163313
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250408