Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Imprint of ancestral and modern threats in human mind - experience of fear, disgust, and anger

E. Landová, J. Polák, M. Janovcová, I. Štolhoferová, Š. Peterková, A. Chomik, D. Frynta

. 2024 ; 15 (-) : 1520224. [pub] 20250115

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25008638

INTRODUCTION: Threats to our survival are often posed by the environment in which humans have evolved or live today. Animal and human ancestors developed complex physiological and behavioral response systems to cope with two types of threats: immediate physical harm from predators or conspecifics, triggering fear, and the risk of infections from parasites and pathogens leading to the evolution of the behavioral immune system (BIS) with disgust as the key emotion. Here we ask whether the BIS has adapted to protect us from pandemic risks or poisoning by modern toxic substances. METHODS: We have developed a survey comprised of 60 vignettes describing threats evoking fear and disgust belonging to one of the three main categories of threats: (1) ancestral, (2) modern, and (3) pandemic of airborne disease. Each vignette was evaluated on a 7-point Likert scale based on fear, disgust, and anger. Respondents also completed an assessment battery. RESULTS: The results show that the strongest fear is triggered by modern threats (electricity, car accidents), while the highest disgust is evoked by ancient threats (body waste products, worms). Disgust does not respond to modern threat stimuli such as toxic substances or radioactivity as these evoke mainly fear and anger. A discriminant factor analysis classified nine out of 10 pandemic disgust vignettes into the ancestral disgust category, convincingly assigning the pandemic disgust threats to the ancestral type. Gender, age, and type of education were significant moderators of emotional responses across all threat categories. DISCUSSION: Our study reveals that while fear is more context-dependent, particularly triggered by modern threats, disgust operates on an evolutionarily hardwired basis, making it less effective against contemporary risks. Furthermore, disgust experienced during a pandemic outbreak is more closely aligned with ancestral disgust-related threats tapping into evolutionary ancient survival circuits of the BIS. However, as disgust declines with age, the brain must adaptatively shift the emotional processing from disgust to fear to protect older adults from contamination risks. Finally, our study reveals that pandemic fear is better predicted by specific behaviors rather than general anxiety, suggesting a need for new assessments.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25008638
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250422095645.0
007      
ta
008      
250408e20250115sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1520224 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39881690
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Landová, Eva $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia
245    10
$a Imprint of ancestral and modern threats in human mind - experience of fear, disgust, and anger / $c E. Landová, J. Polák, M. Janovcová, I. Štolhoferová, Š. Peterková, A. Chomik, D. Frynta
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Threats to our survival are often posed by the environment in which humans have evolved or live today. Animal and human ancestors developed complex physiological and behavioral response systems to cope with two types of threats: immediate physical harm from predators or conspecifics, triggering fear, and the risk of infections from parasites and pathogens leading to the evolution of the behavioral immune system (BIS) with disgust as the key emotion. Here we ask whether the BIS has adapted to protect us from pandemic risks or poisoning by modern toxic substances. METHODS: We have developed a survey comprised of 60 vignettes describing threats evoking fear and disgust belonging to one of the three main categories of threats: (1) ancestral, (2) modern, and (3) pandemic of airborne disease. Each vignette was evaluated on a 7-point Likert scale based on fear, disgust, and anger. Respondents also completed an assessment battery. RESULTS: The results show that the strongest fear is triggered by modern threats (electricity, car accidents), while the highest disgust is evoked by ancient threats (body waste products, worms). Disgust does not respond to modern threat stimuli such as toxic substances or radioactivity as these evoke mainly fear and anger. A discriminant factor analysis classified nine out of 10 pandemic disgust vignettes into the ancestral disgust category, convincingly assigning the pandemic disgust threats to the ancestral type. Gender, age, and type of education were significant moderators of emotional responses across all threat categories. DISCUSSION: Our study reveals that while fear is more context-dependent, particularly triggered by modern threats, disgust operates on an evolutionarily hardwired basis, making it less effective against contemporary risks. Furthermore, disgust experienced during a pandemic outbreak is more closely aligned with ancestral disgust-related threats tapping into evolutionary ancient survival circuits of the BIS. However, as disgust declines with age, the brain must adaptatively shift the emotional processing from disgust to fear to protect older adults from contamination risks. Finally, our study reveals that pandemic fear is better predicted by specific behaviors rather than general anxiety, suggesting a need for new assessments.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Polák, Jakub $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Psychology and Social Sciences, Ambis University, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Janovcová, Markéta $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Štolhoferová, Iveta $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Peterková, Šárka $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Chomik, Aleksandra $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Frynta, Daniel $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 15 (20250115), s. 1520224
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39881690 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250422095647 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2306444 $s 1245713
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 15 $c - $d 1520224 $e 20250115 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...