Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Mechanisms creating homogamy in depressiveness in couples: A longitudinal study from Czechia

Z. Csajbók, J. Fořt, PK. Jonason, J. Havlíček, J. Binter, Z. Štěrbová

. 2025 ; 15 (1) : 9143. [pub] 20250317

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25009480

Grantová podpora
207 015; 207 333 Charles University, Faculty of Humanities, Cooperatio Program, research area Psychological Sciences
23-05379S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
23-05379S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
23-05379S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
23-05379S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
23-05379S Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Couples often resemble each other in characteristics like depression, but the reasons for this homogamy (i.e., similarity) remain unclear. We investigated two potential mechanisms: preference for a self-similar partner and convergence (i.e., increasing similarity) over time. In a nationally representative sample of 2,793 Czech individuals who we surveyed three times in one year, we examined self-reports of participants', their ideal partners', and their actual partners' "pessimism and depressiveness". Participants preferred partners less depressive than themselves, yet their actual partners were more depressive than desired. Those who ended their relationships showed a greater ideal-versus-actual partner discrepancy than those who stayed together. In stable relationships, individuals adjusted their ideal preferences to align more closely with their actual partners over time. We identified four relationship classes with latent class growth modeling based on self and partner evaluations: both non-depressive, both depressive, self depressive and partner non-depressive, and self non-depressive and partner depressive. Romantic relationships were most stable when both partners were non-depressive and most likely to dissolve when both were depressive. While we failed to detect convergence overall, we found it within heterogamous (i.e., dissimilar) classes. Overall, our findings suggest that homogamy and heterogamy in depressiveness are complexly associated with relationship maintenance.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25009480
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429135304.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41598-025-93065-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40097516
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Csajbók, Zsófia $u Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátkova 5, 182 00, Prague 8, Czech Republic. zsofia.csajbok@fhs.cuni.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000258001597
245    10
$a Mechanisms creating homogamy in depressiveness in couples: A longitudinal study from Czechia / $c Z. Csajbók, J. Fořt, PK. Jonason, J. Havlíček, J. Binter, Z. Štěrbová
520    9_
$a Couples often resemble each other in characteristics like depression, but the reasons for this homogamy (i.e., similarity) remain unclear. We investigated two potential mechanisms: preference for a self-similar partner and convergence (i.e., increasing similarity) over time. In a nationally representative sample of 2,793 Czech individuals who we surveyed three times in one year, we examined self-reports of participants', their ideal partners', and their actual partners' "pessimism and depressiveness". Participants preferred partners less depressive than themselves, yet their actual partners were more depressive than desired. Those who ended their relationships showed a greater ideal-versus-actual partner discrepancy than those who stayed together. In stable relationships, individuals adjusted their ideal preferences to align more closely with their actual partners over time. We identified four relationship classes with latent class growth modeling based on self and partner evaluations: both non-depressive, both depressive, self depressive and partner non-depressive, and self non-depressive and partner depressive. Romantic relationships were most stable when both partners were non-depressive and most likely to dissolve when both were depressive. While we failed to detect convergence overall, we found it within heterogamous (i.e., dissimilar) classes. Overall, our findings suggest that homogamy and heterogamy in depressiveness are complexly associated with relationship maintenance.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
650    12
$a deprese $x psychologie $7 D003863
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a sexuální partneři $x psychologie $7 D012747
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a interpersonální vztahy $7 D007398
650    _2
$a charakteristiky rodiny $7 D005191
650    _2
$a zpráva o sobě $7 D057566
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Fořt, Jakub $u Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátkova 5, 182 00, Prague 8, Czech Republic $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000319803607
700    1_
$a Jonason, Peter K $u Psychology Research Institute, University of Economics and Human Sciences, Warsaw, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/000000028833048X
700    1_
$a Havlíček, Jan $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000323747337 $7 mzk2004228328
700    1_
$a Binter, Jakub $u Department of Regional Development and Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, University of Jan Evangelista Purkyně, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000153042130 $7 uk2016910129
700    1_
$a Štěrbová, Zuzana $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000020158922X $7 uk2016910194
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 15, č. 1 (2025), s. 9143
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40097516 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429135259 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311080 $s 1246561
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 15 $c 1 $d 9143 $e 20250317 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
GRA    __
$a 207 015; 207 333 $p Charles University, Faculty of Humanities, Cooperatio Program, research area Psychological Sciences
GRA    __
$a 23-05379S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
GRA    __
$a 23-05379S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
GRA    __
$a 23-05379S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
GRA    __
$a 23-05379S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
GRA    __
$a 23-05379S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace