• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The impact of glidant addition on the loss-in-weight feeding of active pharmaceutical ingredients

T. Verbeek, A. De Man, M. Debacker, B. Bekaert, B. Van Snick, M. Otava, C. Vervaet, V. Vanhoorne

. 2025 ; 671 (-) : 125243. [pub] 20250127

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25009813

In recent years, CM has become increasingly popular in the pharmaceutical industry for the production of OSD forms. Most of the newly developed APIs nowadays are extremely cohesive and sticky with a mean particle size particle of <100 μm, a wide PSD and a high tendency to agglomerate, making them difficult to accurately dose using loss-in-weight equipment during CM. In this research paper, the effect of various glidants on the volumetric and gravimetric feeding of several APIs was assessed. Three challenging API (APAPμ, MPT and SD) and four different glidants (Aerosil® 200, Aerosil® R972, Syloid® 244FP and TRI-CAFOS® 200-7) were selected. For all feeding trials, a GEA CF equipped with 20 mm concave screws was used, in combination with an external catch scale. The volumetric feeding trials showed the ability of each glidant to increase the FFmax and reduce the FFmovRSD40 and the FFdecay for the cohesive APIs (APAPμ and MPT). Although the fumed silica grades showed the highest impact on the previously mentioned feeding parameters, low AE10 values were obtained, negatively affecting the feeding performance at higher glidant concentration. Both Syloid 244FP and TCP were good alternatives. However, to obtain a similar feeding performance a higher concentration of these glidants is required. The volumetric trials showed that glidant addition has no additional benefits for APIs with good flow properties such as SD. The second part of this paper discussed the impact of glidant addition on the gravimetric feeding behavior of the cohesive powders. Both the fumed silica grades (Aerosil® 200 and Aerosil® R972) and Syloid 244FP lowered the deviation on all LC% profiles of the cohesive APIs. In contrast to the volumetric trails, blends with excess fumed silica resulted in low AE10 values which are efficiently dosed by the CF during the gravimetric feeding.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25009813
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429134639.0
007      
ta
008      
250415e20250127ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125243 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39880139
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Verbeek, Tom $u Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; Oral Solid Dosage, Drug Product Development, Pharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing Sciences, Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica, Johnson & Johnson, Turnhoutseweg 30, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium
245    14
$a The impact of glidant addition on the loss-in-weight feeding of active pharmaceutical ingredients / $c T. Verbeek, A. De Man, M. Debacker, B. Bekaert, B. Van Snick, M. Otava, C. Vervaet, V. Vanhoorne
520    9_
$a In recent years, CM has become increasingly popular in the pharmaceutical industry for the production of OSD forms. Most of the newly developed APIs nowadays are extremely cohesive and sticky with a mean particle size particle of <100 μm, a wide PSD and a high tendency to agglomerate, making them difficult to accurately dose using loss-in-weight equipment during CM. In this research paper, the effect of various glidants on the volumetric and gravimetric feeding of several APIs was assessed. Three challenging API (APAPμ, MPT and SD) and four different glidants (Aerosil® 200, Aerosil® R972, Syloid® 244FP and TRI-CAFOS® 200-7) were selected. For all feeding trials, a GEA CF equipped with 20 mm concave screws was used, in combination with an external catch scale. The volumetric feeding trials showed the ability of each glidant to increase the FFmax and reduce the FFmovRSD40 and the FFdecay for the cohesive APIs (APAPμ and MPT). Although the fumed silica grades showed the highest impact on the previously mentioned feeding parameters, low AE10 values were obtained, negatively affecting the feeding performance at higher glidant concentration. Both Syloid 244FP and TCP were good alternatives. However, to obtain a similar feeding performance a higher concentration of these glidants is required. The volumetric trials showed that glidant addition has no additional benefits for APIs with good flow properties such as SD. The second part of this paper discussed the impact of glidant addition on the gravimetric feeding behavior of the cohesive powders. Both the fumed silica grades (Aerosil® 200 and Aerosil® R972) and Syloid 244FP lowered the deviation on all LC% profiles of the cohesive APIs. In contrast to the volumetric trails, blends with excess fumed silica resulted in low AE10 values which are efficiently dosed by the CF during the gravimetric feeding.
650    12
$a velikost částic $7 D010316
650    12
$a pomocné látky $x chemie $7 D005079
650    _2
$a příprava léků $x metody $7 D004339
650    _2
$a léčivé přípravky $x chemie $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D004364
650    _2
$a oxid křemičitý $x chemie $7 D012822
650    _2
$a farmaceutická chemie $x metody $7 D002626
650    _2
$a farmaceutická technologie $x metody $7 D013678
650    _2
$a nerozplněné léky $7 D000095485
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a De Man, Alexander $u Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Process Analytical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Debacker, Melissa $u Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Bekaert, Bram $u Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Van Snick, Bernd $u Oral Solid Dosage, Drug Product Development, Pharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing Sciences, Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica, Johnson & Johnson, Turnhoutseweg 30, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium
700    1_
$a Otava, Martin $u Janssen-Cilag s.r.o., Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 15800, Prague 5, Czechia
700    1_
$a Vervaet, Chris $u Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Vanhoorne, Valérie $u Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: valerie.vanhoorne@ugent.be
773    0_
$w MED00002359 $t International journal of pharmaceutics $x 1873-3476 $g Roč. 671 (20250127), s. 125243
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39880139 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429134634 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311289 $s 1246894
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 671 $c - $d 125243 $e 20250127 $i 1873-3476 $m International journal of pharmaceutics $n Int J Pharm $x MED00002359
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...