Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Classifications of haemodialysis vascular access stenosis: a scoping review

K. Lawrie, S. O'Neill, J. Malik, L. Janousek, M. Corr, S. Maly, J. Chlupac, P. Waldauf

. 2025 ; 15 (1) : e088045. [pub] 20250115

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25010256

OBJECTIVES: Vascular access (VA) stenoses play a significant role in the morbidity of the haemodialysed population. Classifications for diagnosis, assessment and proposal of treatment strategies can be useful clinical and methodological tools. This review aims to present a comprehensive summary and propose further methodological approaches. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature, evaluating classifications for dialysis-related VA stenosis. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched from inception to 7 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All articles containing classifications regarding dialysis VA were eligible, with no restrictions on the study type or language of the full text. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent researchers performed the search and initial screening. Four vascular surgeons assessed the included classifications using a modified Buchbinder's critical appraisal tool to evaluate quality. RESULTS: From 4771 screened papers, 59 full-text papers were retrieved and 24 articles contained classifications. Three classifications were dedicated to VA stenosis, all based on the anatomical location of lesions. According to the modified Buchbinder's appraisal, the classifications were assessed as moderate-to-good quality. The literature disposes of immense inconsistency in terms of the definition of significant stenosis indicated for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: VA significant stenosis and its classification is a non-uniformly understood issue with many different criteria and categorisations. This basic methodological problem leads to inconsistent results. We recommend the unification of the criteria and their validation in prospective studies.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25010256
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429135339.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088045 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39819957
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Lawrie, Katerina $u Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic kt.jandova@gmail.com petrwaldauf@gmail.com $u Charles University Third Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000219233459
245    10
$a Classifications of haemodialysis vascular access stenosis: a scoping review / $c K. Lawrie, S. O'Neill, J. Malik, L. Janousek, M. Corr, S. Maly, J. Chlupac, P. Waldauf
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Vascular access (VA) stenoses play a significant role in the morbidity of the haemodialysed population. Classifications for diagnosis, assessment and proposal of treatment strategies can be useful clinical and methodological tools. This review aims to present a comprehensive summary and propose further methodological approaches. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature, evaluating classifications for dialysis-related VA stenosis. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched from inception to 7 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All articles containing classifications regarding dialysis VA were eligible, with no restrictions on the study type or language of the full text. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent researchers performed the search and initial screening. Four vascular surgeons assessed the included classifications using a modified Buchbinder's critical appraisal tool to evaluate quality. RESULTS: From 4771 screened papers, 59 full-text papers were retrieved and 24 articles contained classifications. Three classifications were dedicated to VA stenosis, all based on the anatomical location of lesions. According to the modified Buchbinder's appraisal, the classifications were assessed as moderate-to-good quality. The literature disposes of immense inconsistency in terms of the definition of significant stenosis indicated for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: VA significant stenosis and its classification is a non-uniformly understood issue with many different criteria and categorisations. This basic methodological problem leads to inconsistent results. We recommend the unification of the criteria and their validation in prospective studies.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a dialýza ledvin $x metody $7 D006435
650    _2
$a stenóza $7 D003251
650    12
$a arteriovenózní zkrat $7 D001166
650    _2
$a okluze cévního štěpu $x etiologie $7 D006083
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a O'Neill, Stephen $u Department of Transplant Surgery and Regional Nephrology Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK $u Centre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
700    1_
$a Malik, Jan $u Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $u Third Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000223863293 $7 xx0060338
700    1_
$a Janousek, Libor $u Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $u Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Corr, Michael $u Department of Transplant Surgery and Regional Nephrology Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK $u Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
700    1_
$a Maly, Stepan $u Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $u Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chlupac, Jaroslav $u Department of Transplantation Surgery, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Waldauf, Petr $u Charles University Third Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic kt.jandova@gmail.com petrwaldauf@gmail.com $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00184484 $t BMJ open $x 2044-6055 $g Roč. 15, č. 1 (2025), s. e088045
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39819957 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429135334 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311556 $s 1247337
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 15 $c 1 $d e088045 $e 20250115 $i 2044-6055 $m BMJ open $n BMJ Open $x MED00184484
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options