Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Possibilities of intranasal reconstruction in complex nasal defects

Z. Dvořák, M. Kubát, A. Berkeš, R. Pink, T. Kubek, J. Menoušek

. 2025 ; 67 (1) : 27-41.

Status minimální Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25013682

Background: Complex nasal defects most often arise due to oncological resection or severe trauma. Traditional methods of two-stage nose reconstruction using a forehead flap with a skin graft have often resulted in collapse and deformity of the nose with a very compromised outcome over time. These techniques were gradually replaced by new procedures consistently reconstructing the intranasal lining, most often with flaps from the nasal septum. These methods reconstruct the cartilaginous and bony support of the nose as well, while the skin cover of the nose is, nowadays, in large defects, reconstructed in three stages. Evaluation of the topic: The options for intranasal lining reconstruction are as follows: a composite graft, a turnover flap covered with a local flap, advancement of the residual lining (bipedicle vestibular mucosa flap), a folded forehead flap, a prelaminated forehead flap, the use of another local flap (a forehead, nasolabial, facial artery myomucosal flap), a hinged turnover flap, a septal mucoperichondrial hinged flap, a composite septal chondromucosal pivot flap, a turbinate flap and microvascular free flaps (a radial forearm flap, a helix free flap, a kite flap, a dorsalis pedis free flap, a temporoparietal free flap, a postauricular free flap). Thanks to the abundant vascular supply of the face, the risk of ischemia and infection is mitigated, allowing most complex nasal defects to be reconstructed by using local flaps to restore all layers of the nose. Local tissues retain ideal quality, coloration, and texture, are reliable, and usually result in esthetically acceptable morbidity of the donor area. If the inner lining defect is extensive, it must be reconstructed by free microvascular tissue transfer. If other than intranasal flaps are used in the reconstruction of the internal lining, it is preferable to postpone the reconstruction of the supporting framework until the second stage while thinning the flaps used; otherwise, there is a high risk of obturation of the nasal airways. Conclusion: The results of modern reconstruction dramatically improved after the introduction of three-stage nasal reconstruction and emphasizing the reconstruction of all layers of the nose. Therefore, a quality inner lining is the basis for the construction of the new nose.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25013682
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250820101951.0
007      
ta
008      
250626s2025 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.48095/ccachp202527 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Dvořák, Zdeněk $u Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, St. Anne's Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0143142
245    10
$a Possibilities of intranasal reconstruction in complex nasal defects / $c Z. Dvořák, M. Kubát, A. Berkeš, R. Pink, T. Kubek, J. Menoušek
520    9_
$a Background: Complex nasal defects most often arise due to oncological resection or severe trauma. Traditional methods of two-stage nose reconstruction using a forehead flap with a skin graft have often resulted in collapse and deformity of the nose with a very compromised outcome over time. These techniques were gradually replaced by new procedures consistently reconstructing the intranasal lining, most often with flaps from the nasal septum. These methods reconstruct the cartilaginous and bony support of the nose as well, while the skin cover of the nose is, nowadays, in large defects, reconstructed in three stages. Evaluation of the topic: The options for intranasal lining reconstruction are as follows: a composite graft, a turnover flap covered with a local flap, advancement of the residual lining (bipedicle vestibular mucosa flap), a folded forehead flap, a prelaminated forehead flap, the use of another local flap (a forehead, nasolabial, facial artery myomucosal flap), a hinged turnover flap, a septal mucoperichondrial hinged flap, a composite septal chondromucosal pivot flap, a turbinate flap and microvascular free flaps (a radial forearm flap, a helix free flap, a kite flap, a dorsalis pedis free flap, a temporoparietal free flap, a postauricular free flap). Thanks to the abundant vascular supply of the face, the risk of ischemia and infection is mitigated, allowing most complex nasal defects to be reconstructed by using local flaps to restore all layers of the nose. Local tissues retain ideal quality, coloration, and texture, are reliable, and usually result in esthetically acceptable morbidity of the donor area. If the inner lining defect is extensive, it must be reconstructed by free microvascular tissue transfer. If other than intranasal flaps are used in the reconstruction of the internal lining, it is preferable to postpone the reconstruction of the supporting framework until the second stage while thinning the flaps used; otherwise, there is a high risk of obturation of the nasal airways. Conclusion: The results of modern reconstruction dramatically improved after the introduction of three-stage nasal reconstruction and emphasizing the reconstruction of all layers of the nose. Therefore, a quality inner lining is the basis for the construction of the new nose.
700    1_
$a Kubát, Martin $u Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, St. Anne's Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0272098
700    1_
$a Berkeš, Andrej $u Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, St. Anne's Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0318569
700    1_
$a Pink, Richard $u Department of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0170220
700    1_
$a Kubek, Tomáš $u Department of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0160852
700    1_
$a Menoušek, Jan $u Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, St. Anne's Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0307350
773    0_
$w MED00000058 $t Acta chirurgiae plasticae $x 0001-5423 $g Roč. 67, č. 1 (2025), s. 27-41
856    41
$u https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/acta-chirurgiae-plasticae/2025-1-24/possibilities-of-intranasal-reconstruction-in-complex-nasal-defects-140883 $y Meditorial
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 3021 $c 507 b $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250626 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250820101933 $b ABA008
999    __
$a min $b bmc $g 2378508 $s 1250801
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 67 $c 1 $d 27-41 $i 0001-5423 $m Acta chirurgiae plasticae $x MED00000058 $y 140883
LZP    __
$b NLK111 $a Meditorial-20250626

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...