Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Hip Joint Intercartilage Space, Range of Motion, and Lateral Differences in Elite and Subelite Ice Hockey Players: A Case-Control Trial

J. Mala, T. Hybner, P. Stastny

. 2025 ; 13 (6) : 23259671251344240. [pub] 20250618

Status not-indexed Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Ice hockey players experience groin pain and imbalances in the muscles of the hip joint, possibly because of the condition of the intercartilage space (ICS). PURPOSE: To describe the lateral differences in size of the articular ICS, range of motion, and adductor/abductor muscle strength between elite and subelite ice hockey players and a control group of participants who did not play ice hockey. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: 33 elite hockey players, 26 subelite hockey players, and 30 non-ice hockey player controls were compared in terms of ICS thickness, isometric hip abductor muscle strength, hip range of motion, functional test results, and pain score. Two-way analysis of variance was used to identify differences in laterality and performance levels. RESULTS: The ICS of the hip joint was smaller (P < .001) in both groups of ice hockey players than in the control group (0.97 ± 0.11 mm) and smaller (P = .005) on the backhand side (elite 0.66 ± 0.24 mm; subelite 0.65 ± 0.15 mm) than on the forehand side (elite 0.78 ± 0.18 mm; subelite 0.74 ± 0.24 mm) in both groups of hockey players. Compared with the control (41.6°± 4°) and subelite groups, the elite group had less (P < .001) hip external rotation (elite 30.4°± 6.1°; subelite 35°± 6.5°) and internal rotation (elite 31.5°± 5.1°; subelite 35.1°± 6.5°), with no differences in laterality (P > .05). Both hockey groups had positive hip pain provocation tests and greater (P < .001) hip adduction (elite 457 ± 85 N; subelite 450 ± 82 N) and abduction (elite 429 ± 60 N; subelite 422 ± 63 N) muscle strength than the controls (adduction 347 ± 70 N; abduction 346 ± 75 N). Elite players had a greater (P = .008) adductor strength ratio on the backhand side (1.16 ± 19) than the control group (1.02 ± 0.15). CONCLUSION: Ice hockey players had a smaller ICS of the hip joint, particularly on the backhand side. These structural changes were accompanied by reduced range of motion in the hip joint, increased pain, and asymmetries in muscle strength. Hip range of motion and symmetry of adductor/abductor muscle strength should be considered when diagnosing ice hockey players. ICS assessment via sonography might become a useful tool for the evaluation of structural changes in the hip. Research on ice hockey-related injuries should focus more on the structural and functional condition of the backhand side of the hip.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25014143
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250905141402.0
007      
ta
008      
250701s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/23259671251344240 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40538641
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mala, Jitka $u Charles University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Hip Joint Intercartilage Space, Range of Motion, and Lateral Differences in Elite and Subelite Ice Hockey Players: A Case-Control Trial / $c J. Mala, T. Hybner, P. Stastny
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Ice hockey players experience groin pain and imbalances in the muscles of the hip joint, possibly because of the condition of the intercartilage space (ICS). PURPOSE: To describe the lateral differences in size of the articular ICS, range of motion, and adductor/abductor muscle strength between elite and subelite ice hockey players and a control group of participants who did not play ice hockey. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: 33 elite hockey players, 26 subelite hockey players, and 30 non-ice hockey player controls were compared in terms of ICS thickness, isometric hip abductor muscle strength, hip range of motion, functional test results, and pain score. Two-way analysis of variance was used to identify differences in laterality and performance levels. RESULTS: The ICS of the hip joint was smaller (P < .001) in both groups of ice hockey players than in the control group (0.97 ± 0.11 mm) and smaller (P = .005) on the backhand side (elite 0.66 ± 0.24 mm; subelite 0.65 ± 0.15 mm) than on the forehand side (elite 0.78 ± 0.18 mm; subelite 0.74 ± 0.24 mm) in both groups of hockey players. Compared with the control (41.6°± 4°) and subelite groups, the elite group had less (P < .001) hip external rotation (elite 30.4°± 6.1°; subelite 35°± 6.5°) and internal rotation (elite 31.5°± 5.1°; subelite 35.1°± 6.5°), with no differences in laterality (P > .05). Both hockey groups had positive hip pain provocation tests and greater (P < .001) hip adduction (elite 457 ± 85 N; subelite 450 ± 82 N) and abduction (elite 429 ± 60 N; subelite 422 ± 63 N) muscle strength than the controls (adduction 347 ± 70 N; abduction 346 ± 75 N). Elite players had a greater (P = .008) adductor strength ratio on the backhand side (1.16 ± 19) than the control group (1.02 ± 0.15). CONCLUSION: Ice hockey players had a smaller ICS of the hip joint, particularly on the backhand side. These structural changes were accompanied by reduced range of motion in the hip joint, increased pain, and asymmetries in muscle strength. Hip range of motion and symmetry of adductor/abductor muscle strength should be considered when diagnosing ice hockey players. ICS assessment via sonography might become a useful tool for the evaluation of structural changes in the hip. Research on ice hockey-related injuries should focus more on the structural and functional condition of the backhand side of the hip.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hybner, Tomas $u Charles University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Stastny, Petr $u Charles University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000032841374X $7 xx0145353
773    0_
$w MED00196740 $t Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine $x 2325-9671 $g Roč. 13, č. 6 (2025), s. 23259671251344240
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40538641 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250701 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250905141350 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2387976 $s 1251263
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 13 $c 6 $d 23259671251344240 $e 20250618 $i 2325-9671 $m Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine $n Orthop J Sports Med $x MED00196740
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250701

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...