-
Something wrong with this record ?
Ecosystem, spatial and trophic dimensions of niche partitioning among freshwater fish predators
M. Říha, L. Vejřík, R. Rabaneda-Bueno, I. Jarić, M. Prchalová, I. Vejříková, M. Šmejkal, P. Blabolil, M. Čech, V. Draštík, M. Holubová, T. Jůza, KØ. Gjelland, Z. Sajdlová, L. Kočvara, M. Tušer, J. Peterka
Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
No 101157886
HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
No 101157886
HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458
European Commission
LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458
European Commission
LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458
European Commission
LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458
European Commission
LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458
European Commission
RP21
Akademie Věd České Republiky
RP21
Akademie Věd České Republiky
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2013-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2013
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2014
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
ProQuest Central
from 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2014-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2013-12-01
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Niche partitioning allows species to diversify resource utilisation and space allocation and reduce interspecific competition. Variations in abiotic and biotic conditions in different ecosystems may further influence resource availability and habitat utilisation, potentially reducing competition. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of environmental variation on spatial and trophic niche overlap between two freshwater apex predators, the northern pike (Esox lucius) and the European catfish (Silurus glanis), in three different water bodies. METHODS: We used fine-scale acoustic telemetry to assess the spatial niche overlap of pike and catfish, analyzing their spatial and habitat use in relation to the thermocline and their presence in benthic versus open-water habitats. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) was used to quantify trophic niche overlap and dietary differences between the species. We compared the habitat use, spatial niche width and overlap, and trophic differentiation among waterbodies to determine how environmental conditions influence predator interactions. RESULTS: During summer, pike and catfish primarily occupied benthic habitats above the thermocline across all waterbodies and diel periods. However, catfish more frequently used open water above the thermocline, while pike were more often present in both open water and benthic habitats below it. While this general pattern of habitat use was consistent, its extent varied among lakes, suggesting that local environmental conditions shape species-specific habitat selection. Despite these variations, the species exhibited substantial spatial overlap, though its magnitude fluctuated across waterbodies and diel periods. Catfish occupied a broader spatial niche in two waterbodies, while pike had a broader niche in one. Across all lakes, catfish consistently maintained a broader trophic niche than pike. However, pike exhibited higher trophic overlap with catfish than vice versa, with nearly complete overlap in one lake and substantial but incomplete overlap in others. This suggests that pike relies more heavily on shared prey resources, while catfish exploits a broader range of food sources beyond those used by pike.These patterns were primarily driven by the position of the thermocline, prey availability, structural complexity and the greater foraging plasticity of catfish, highlighting the environmental dependence of niche partitioning in these predators. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that spatial and trophic niche overlaps between pike and catfish are highly context-dependent, shaped by abiotic conditions, prey availability, and species-specific foraging strategies. This study highlights the importance of integrating spatial and trophic analyses to understand predator interactions in aquatic ecosystems.
Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice České Budějovice Czech Republic
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Tromsø Norway
Université Paris Saclay CNRS AgroParisTech Ecologie Systématique Evolution Gif sur Yvette France
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25014298
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250905141417.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250701s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s40462-025-00559-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40426197
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Říha, Milan $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. milan.riha@hbu.cas.cz $1 https://orcid.org/000000023930420X
- 245 10
- $a Ecosystem, spatial and trophic dimensions of niche partitioning among freshwater fish predators / $c M. Říha, L. Vejřík, R. Rabaneda-Bueno, I. Jarić, M. Prchalová, I. Vejříková, M. Šmejkal, P. Blabolil, M. Čech, V. Draštík, M. Holubová, T. Jůza, KØ. Gjelland, Z. Sajdlová, L. Kočvara, M. Tušer, J. Peterka
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Niche partitioning allows species to diversify resource utilisation and space allocation and reduce interspecific competition. Variations in abiotic and biotic conditions in different ecosystems may further influence resource availability and habitat utilisation, potentially reducing competition. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of environmental variation on spatial and trophic niche overlap between two freshwater apex predators, the northern pike (Esox lucius) and the European catfish (Silurus glanis), in three different water bodies. METHODS: We used fine-scale acoustic telemetry to assess the spatial niche overlap of pike and catfish, analyzing their spatial and habitat use in relation to the thermocline and their presence in benthic versus open-water habitats. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) was used to quantify trophic niche overlap and dietary differences between the species. We compared the habitat use, spatial niche width and overlap, and trophic differentiation among waterbodies to determine how environmental conditions influence predator interactions. RESULTS: During summer, pike and catfish primarily occupied benthic habitats above the thermocline across all waterbodies and diel periods. However, catfish more frequently used open water above the thermocline, while pike were more often present in both open water and benthic habitats below it. While this general pattern of habitat use was consistent, its extent varied among lakes, suggesting that local environmental conditions shape species-specific habitat selection. Despite these variations, the species exhibited substantial spatial overlap, though its magnitude fluctuated across waterbodies and diel periods. Catfish occupied a broader spatial niche in two waterbodies, while pike had a broader niche in one. Across all lakes, catfish consistently maintained a broader trophic niche than pike. However, pike exhibited higher trophic overlap with catfish than vice versa, with nearly complete overlap in one lake and substantial but incomplete overlap in others. This suggests that pike relies more heavily on shared prey resources, while catfish exploits a broader range of food sources beyond those used by pike.These patterns were primarily driven by the position of the thermocline, prey availability, structural complexity and the greater foraging plasticity of catfish, highlighting the environmental dependence of niche partitioning in these predators. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that spatial and trophic niche overlaps between pike and catfish are highly context-dependent, shaped by abiotic conditions, prey availability, and species-specific foraging strategies. This study highlights the importance of integrating spatial and trophic analyses to understand predator interactions in aquatic ecosystems.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vejřík, Lukáš $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rabaneda-Bueno, Rubén $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jarić, Ivan $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic $u Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Gif- sur-Yvette, France
- 700 1_
- $a Prchalová, Marie $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vejříková, Ivana $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Šmejkal, Marek $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Blabolil, Petr $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Čech, Martin $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Draštík, Vladislav $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Holubová, Michaela $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jůza, Tomáš $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Gjelland, Karl Ø $u Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Tromsø, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Sajdlová, Zuzana $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kočvara, Luboš $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tušer, Michal $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Peterka, Jiří $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00203336 $t Movement ecology $x 2051-3933 $g Roč. 13, č. 1 (2025), s. 36
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40426197 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250701 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250905141405 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2388036 $s 1251418
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 13 $c 1 $d 36 $e 20250527 $i 2051-3933 $m Movement ecology $n Mov Ecol $x MED00203336
- GRA __
- $a No 101157886 $p HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
- GRA __
- $a No 101157886 $p HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
- GRA __
- $a LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458 $p European Commission
- GRA __
- $a LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458 $p European Commission
- GRA __
- $a LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458 $p European Commission
- GRA __
- $a LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458 $p European Commission
- GRA __
- $a LIFE21-NAT/IT/PREDATOR No. 101074458 $p European Commission
- GRA __
- $a RP21 $p Akademie Věd České Republiky
- GRA __
- $a RP21 $p Akademie Věd České Republiky
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250701