Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses

A. Janekova, M. Polachova, DP. Piñero, P. Studeny

. 2025 ; 18 (4) : 598-605. [pub] 20250418

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Čína

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25014521

AIM: To compare the 12-month outcomes of visual performance and patient satisfaction of a higher-order aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a conventional monofocal IOL. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blinded study including 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL in one eye (ICB00 group) and the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL in the fellow eye (ZCB00 group). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuities (DCNVA) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, and reading text size were also evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire at the 6-month postoperative visit. RESULTS: Mean postoperative logMAR UDVA was 0.01±0.12 and -0.02±0.10 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.37). Mean logMAR UIVA was 0.32±0.19 and 0.45±0.16 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.010). Differences between groups in UNVA did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16). The intermediate reading acuity at 66 cm (P=0.02) and 80 cm (P=0.04) was significantly better in the ICB00 group. Postoperative contrast sensitivity results did not differ significantly between groups (P>0.05). Patients reported high overall satisfaction, with 62% of patients using spectacles for reading in everyday life. CONCLUSION: The eyes of patients implanted with the enhanced monofocal IOL evaluated have significantly better visual acuity for intermediate distances with the same contrast sensitivity as a conventional monofocal IOL.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25014521
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250905141349.0
007      
ta
008      
250701s2025 cc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40256030
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a cc
100    1_
$a Janekova, Andrea $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 10034, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic $u Eye Center Prague, Prague 17000, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses / $c A. Janekova, M. Polachova, DP. Piñero, P. Studeny
520    9_
$a AIM: To compare the 12-month outcomes of visual performance and patient satisfaction of a higher-order aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a conventional monofocal IOL. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blinded study including 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL in one eye (ICB00 group) and the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL in the fellow eye (ZCB00 group). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuities (DCNVA) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, and reading text size were also evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire at the 6-month postoperative visit. RESULTS: Mean postoperative logMAR UDVA was 0.01±0.12 and -0.02±0.10 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.37). Mean logMAR UIVA was 0.32±0.19 and 0.45±0.16 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.010). Differences between groups in UNVA did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16). The intermediate reading acuity at 66 cm (P=0.02) and 80 cm (P=0.04) was significantly better in the ICB00 group. Postoperative contrast sensitivity results did not differ significantly between groups (P>0.05). Patients reported high overall satisfaction, with 62% of patients using spectacles for reading in everyday life. CONCLUSION: The eyes of patients implanted with the enhanced monofocal IOL evaluated have significantly better visual acuity for intermediate distances with the same contrast sensitivity as a conventional monofocal IOL.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Polachova, Martina $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 10034, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Piñero, David P $u Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante 03690, Spain
700    1_
$a Studeny, Pavel $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 10034, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00188765 $t International journal of ophthalmology $x 2222-3959 $g Roč. 18, č. 4 (2025), s. 598-605
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40256030 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250701 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250905141337 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2388109 $s 1251641
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 18 $c 4 $d 598-605 $e 20250418 $i 2222-3959 $m International journal of ophthalmology $n Int J Ophthalmol $x MED00188765
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250701

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace