• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

European guidelines on management of arrested or protracted labor in nulliparous women

JJ. Duvekot, D. Ayres-de-Campos, S. Brismar Wendel, G. Daskalakis, I. Dehaene, M. Kacerovsky, S. Kehl, J. Glavind, A. Hamza, MA. Ledingham, B. Magowan, E. Mestdagh, I. Wilsens, S. Veenstra-Kwakkel, I. van Ee, P. Stenbäck, C. Matteo, Y. Labeur, D....

. 2025 ; 311 (-) : 114064. [pub] 20250517

Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015181

Arrested or protracted labor in nulliparous women caused by insufficient uterine contractility is a common problem in obstetrics, for which few management guidelines exist. The European Association of Perinatal Medicine nominated an expert panel, consisting of specialists in obstetrics and gynecology and midwives representing their respective professional national societies in nine European countries and patient representatives. The panel developed an evidence-based guideline for clinical practice supported by the Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists. Five priority clinical questions (PICOs) were identified on nulliparous women, at term, with a singleton fetus, in cephalic presentation, and the diagnosis of arrested or protracted labor. For each question relevant outcome measures were defined as well as a minimal clinically important difference for each of them. Five literature searches were performed by an information specialist and articles were selected independently by two panel members. The GRADE methodology was used to write evidence summaries, considerations, and recommendations. The draft guideline was sent out for review to scientific societies involved in perinatal care in 20 European countries. Comments were answered, and the guideline was revised accordingly. The following procedures should be offered to women: 1) Amniotomy alone may be considered. 2) Women should be informed that there is no scientific evidence regarding the beneficial effects of immediate (<1 h) or delayed administration of oxytocin, although the first option may reduce the duration of labor. A joint decision is recommended, based on clinical judgment, and women's values and preferences. 3) A low-dose oxytocin regimen for labor augmentation should be considered. 4) Amniotomy should be considered before the administration of oxytocin infusion during the first stage of spontaneous labor. 5) Oxytocin augmentation for at least four hours with adequate uterine contractions should be considered, before an operative delivery is proposed, provided that fetal and maternal conditions are adequate.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015181
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731090813.0
007      
ta
008      
250708e20250517ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114064 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40398142
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Duvekot, Johannes J $u Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.duvekot@erasmusmc.nl
245    10
$a European guidelines on management of arrested or protracted labor in nulliparous women / $c JJ. Duvekot, D. Ayres-de-Campos, S. Brismar Wendel, G. Daskalakis, I. Dehaene, M. Kacerovsky, S. Kehl, J. Glavind, A. Hamza, MA. Ledingham, B. Magowan, E. Mestdagh, I. Wilsens, S. Veenstra-Kwakkel, I. van Ee, P. Stenbäck, C. Matteo, Y. Labeur, D. Middelhuis, L. Niesink-Boerboom, J. Tuijtelaars, JH. van der Lee, European Association of Perinatal Medicine
520    9_
$a Arrested or protracted labor in nulliparous women caused by insufficient uterine contractility is a common problem in obstetrics, for which few management guidelines exist. The European Association of Perinatal Medicine nominated an expert panel, consisting of specialists in obstetrics and gynecology and midwives representing their respective professional national societies in nine European countries and patient representatives. The panel developed an evidence-based guideline for clinical practice supported by the Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists. Five priority clinical questions (PICOs) were identified on nulliparous women, at term, with a singleton fetus, in cephalic presentation, and the diagnosis of arrested or protracted labor. For each question relevant outcome measures were defined as well as a minimal clinically important difference for each of them. Five literature searches were performed by an information specialist and articles were selected independently by two panel members. The GRADE methodology was used to write evidence summaries, considerations, and recommendations. The draft guideline was sent out for review to scientific societies involved in perinatal care in 20 European countries. Comments were answered, and the guideline was revised accordingly. The following procedures should be offered to women: 1) Amniotomy alone may be considered. 2) Women should be informed that there is no scientific evidence regarding the beneficial effects of immediate (<1 h) or delayed administration of oxytocin, although the first option may reduce the duration of labor. A joint decision is recommended, based on clinical judgment, and women's values and preferences. 3) A low-dose oxytocin regimen for labor augmentation should be considered. 4) Amniotomy should be considered before the administration of oxytocin infusion during the first stage of spontaneous labor. 5) Oxytocin augmentation for at least four hours with adequate uterine contractions should be considered, before an operative delivery is proposed, provided that fetal and maternal conditions are adequate.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a parita $7 D010298
650    12
$a dystokie $x terapie $x diagnóza $7 D004420
650    _2
$a oxytocin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010121
650    12
$a komplikace porodu $x terapie $x diagnóza $7 D007744
650    _2
$a amniotomie $7 D000074885
650    _2
$a uterotonika $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010120
650    _2
$a porodní děj $7 D007743
650    _2
$a vedení porodu $7 D036861
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi $7 D017065
700    1_
$a Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo $u Medical School, Santa Maria Hospital, University of Lisbon, Portugal
700    1_
$a Brismar Wendel, Sophia $u Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: sophia.brismar-wendel@regionstockholm.se
700    1_
$a Daskalakis, George $u National & Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
700    1_
$a Dehaene, Isabelle $u Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. Electronic address: Isabelle.Dehaene@uzgent.be
700    1_
$a Kacerovsky, Marian $u University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kehl, Sven $u LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Glavind, Julie $u Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Electronic address: julie.glavind@clin.au.dk
700    1_
$a Hamza, Amr $u Cantonal Hospital Baden, Switzerland. Electronic address: Amr.Hamza@ksb.ch
700    1_
$a Ledingham, Marie Anne $u The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Glasgow, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Magowan, Brian $u NHS Borders, Scotland, United Kingdom. Electronic address: brian.magowan@icloud.com
700    1_
$a Mestdagh, Eveline $u KNOV, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: emestdagh@knov.nl
700    1_
$a Wilsens, Imara $u KNOV, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: iwilsens@knov.nl
700    1_
$a Veenstra-Kwakkel, Sanna $u KNOV, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: sveenstra@knov.nl
700    1_
$a van Ee, Ilse $u Dutch Patient Federation, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: i.vanee@patientenfederatie.nl
700    1_
$a Stenbäck, Pernilla $u European Midwives Association, School of Business and Healthcare, Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: Treasurer@europeanmidwives.com
700    1_
$a Matteo, Caroline $u European Midwives Association, Aix-Marseille Université, France. Electronic address: caroline.matteo@univ-amu.fr
700    1_
$a Labeur, Yvonne $u Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: y.labeur@kennisinstituut.nl
700    1_
$a Middelhuis, Danique $u Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: d.middelhuis@kennisinstituut.nl
700    1_
$a Niesink-Boerboom, Linda $u Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: l.niesink@kennisinstituut.nl
700    1_
$a Tuijtelaars, Jana $u Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.tuijtelaars@kennisinstituut.nl
700    1_
$a van der Lee, Johanna H $u Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: h.vanderlee@kennisinstituut.nl
710    2_
$a European Association of Perinatal Medicine
773    0_
$w MED00001632 $t European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $x 1872-7654 $g Roč. 311 (20250517), s. 114064
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40398142 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731090808 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366187 $s 1252306
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 311 $c - $d 114064 $e 20250517 $i 1872-7654 $m European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $n Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol $x MED00001632
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace