-
Something wrong with this record ?
Abdominal wound dehiscence after appendectomy during pregnancy treated by negative pressure wound therapy with subsequent vaginal delivery: A case report and literature review
J. Zapletal, B. Sehnal, R. Dvorak, M. Drienko, R. Vlk, MJ. Halaska, L. Rob
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Case Reports, Review
Grant support
Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen
PubMed
39825682
DOI
10.1002/ijgo.16155
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Appendectomy * adverse effects MeSH
- Appendicitis surgery MeSH
- Surgical Wound Dehiscence * therapy etiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Pregnancy Complications * surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy * methods MeSH
- Delivery, Obstetric methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Case Reports MeSH
- Review MeSH
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a very effective method in the treatment of dehiscent, infected, and non-healing wounds. Difficult wound healing occurs especially in late pregnancy due to the rapid enlargement of the uterus and the constantly increasing tension of the entire abdominal wall. In cases of dehiscence of the surgical wound during pregnancy, proper subsequent treatment is needed, where it is necessary to consider the safety of the mother as well as the fetus. We report the case of a 30-week pregnant patient who was surgically treated for acute appendicitis in pregnancy with an open appendectomy approach. Postoperative complications resulted in wound dehiscence with complete defect in fascia, which was treated with negative V.A.C. ATS® Therapy System. The therapy was started in the 30th week of pregnancy and continued until delivery with regular check-ups and regular redressing of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system. At 38 weeks of pregnancy, the patient delivered vaginally with continued VAC therapy in situ. The final suture took place 3 days after vaginal delivery. Non-healing wounds with abdominal wall defects should be treated using a multidisciplinary approach, and NPWT can be used. This therapy can also be used during pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is preferred because it reduces the risk of further formation or deepening of the abdominal wall defect after a sufficient time interval from the start of the treatment. This complex case with a literature review of surgical complications in pregnancy treated with NPWT therapy highlights the advantage of a multidisciplinary approach.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25015227
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731090840.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/ijgo.16155 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39825682
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Zapletal, Jan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000327052970
- 245 10
- $a Abdominal wound dehiscence after appendectomy during pregnancy treated by negative pressure wound therapy with subsequent vaginal delivery: A case report and literature review / $c J. Zapletal, B. Sehnal, R. Dvorak, M. Drienko, R. Vlk, MJ. Halaska, L. Rob
- 520 9_
- $a Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a very effective method in the treatment of dehiscent, infected, and non-healing wounds. Difficult wound healing occurs especially in late pregnancy due to the rapid enlargement of the uterus and the constantly increasing tension of the entire abdominal wall. In cases of dehiscence of the surgical wound during pregnancy, proper subsequent treatment is needed, where it is necessary to consider the safety of the mother as well as the fetus. We report the case of a 30-week pregnant patient who was surgically treated for acute appendicitis in pregnancy with an open appendectomy approach. Postoperative complications resulted in wound dehiscence with complete defect in fascia, which was treated with negative V.A.C. ATS® Therapy System. The therapy was started in the 30th week of pregnancy and continued until delivery with regular check-ups and regular redressing of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system. At 38 weeks of pregnancy, the patient delivered vaginally with continued VAC therapy in situ. The final suture took place 3 days after vaginal delivery. Non-healing wounds with abdominal wall defects should be treated using a multidisciplinary approach, and NPWT can be used. This therapy can also be used during pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is preferred because it reduces the risk of further formation or deepening of the abdominal wall defect after a sufficient time interval from the start of the treatment. This complex case with a literature review of surgical complications in pregnancy treated with NPWT therapy highlights the advantage of a multidisciplinary approach.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 12
- $a terapie ran pomocí řízeného podtlaku $x metody $7 D054843
- 650 12
- $a dehiscence operační rány $x terapie $x etiologie $7 D013529
- 650 12
- $a apendektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001062
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a apendicitida $x chirurgie $7 D001064
- 650 12
- $a komplikace těhotenství $x chirurgie $7 D011248
- 650 _2
- $a vedení porodu $x metody $7 D036861
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a kazuistiky $7 D002363
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Sehnal, Borek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000326222181 $7 xx0130045
- 700 1_
- $a Dvorak, Radim $u Department of Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000384932066
- 700 1_
- $a Drienko, Miroslav $u Department of Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vlk, Radovan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Halaska, Michael J $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000233911412
- 700 1_
- $a Rob, Lukas $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000033770651X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009895 $t International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics $x 1879-3479 $g Roč. 170, č. 1 (2025), s. 150-156
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39825682 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731090834 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366216 $s 1252352
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 170 $c 1 $d 150-156 $e 20250118 $i 1879-3479 $m International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics $n Int J Gynaecol Obstet $x MED00009895
- GRA __
- $p Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708