• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Perioperative morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular germ cell tumors: an in-depth single center analysis according to European Association of Urology guidelines of complication reporting and a scoping literature review

J. Klemm, R. Dahlem, M. Hartmann, M. von Deimling, RJ. Schulz, D. Klemm, F. Janisch, SF. Shariat, M. Fisch, MW. Vetterlein

. 2025 ; 60 (-) : 102228. [pub] 20250509

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, scoping review

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015430

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is crucial in managing metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs), particularly post-chemotherapy. Given the long-term survival of these patients, perioperative morbidity is a significant concern. However, data on RPLND morbidity using predefined reporting standards are scarce. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for standardized complication reporting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent RPLND for GCTs between 2010 and 2022. 30-day complications were extracted from digital charts using a predefined procedure-specific catalog. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Sixty-nine men underwent RPLND at a median age of 32 years (IQR 25-38). Chemotherapy was administered to 64 patients (93 %), with 48 (70 %) having negative tumor markers. Median tumor diameter was 52 mm (IQR 35-83), and median operative time was 197 min (IQR 128-262). Unilateral template removal was performed in 55 patients (80 %). A total of 157 complications were reported in 66 patients (96 %), with anemia (33 %) and gastrointestinal issues (24 %) being the most common. Five patients (7.2 %) had "major" complications (CDC grade ≥ IIIa), and the median CCI was 12 (IQR 9-23). Using the CCI, the proportion of patients with a "major" complication burden increased to 14 %, compared to 8.5 % by CDC alone. The primary limitation of this study is its retrospective design and the limited 30-day follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Most patients experience postoperative complications after RPLND, though severe complications are rare. These findings could improve patient counseling when discussing testicular cancer therapy options.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015430
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731090953.0
007      
ta
008      
250708e20250509ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102228 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40378498
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Klemm, Jakob $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
245    10
$a Perioperative morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular germ cell tumors: an in-depth single center analysis according to European Association of Urology guidelines of complication reporting and a scoping literature review / $c J. Klemm, R. Dahlem, M. Hartmann, M. von Deimling, RJ. Schulz, D. Klemm, F. Janisch, SF. Shariat, M. Fisch, MW. Vetterlein
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is crucial in managing metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs), particularly post-chemotherapy. Given the long-term survival of these patients, perioperative morbidity is a significant concern. However, data on RPLND morbidity using predefined reporting standards are scarce. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for standardized complication reporting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent RPLND for GCTs between 2010 and 2022. 30-day complications were extracted from digital charts using a predefined procedure-specific catalog. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Sixty-nine men underwent RPLND at a median age of 32 years (IQR 25-38). Chemotherapy was administered to 64 patients (93 %), with 48 (70 %) having negative tumor markers. Median tumor diameter was 52 mm (IQR 35-83), and median operative time was 197 min (IQR 128-262). Unilateral template removal was performed in 55 patients (80 %). A total of 157 complications were reported in 66 patients (96 %), with anemia (33 %) and gastrointestinal issues (24 %) being the most common. Five patients (7.2 %) had "major" complications (CDC grade ≥ IIIa), and the median CCI was 12 (IQR 9-23). Using the CCI, the proportion of patients with a "major" complication burden increased to 14 %, compared to 8.5 % by CDC alone. The primary limitation of this study is its retrospective design and the limited 30-day follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Most patients experience postoperative complications after RPLND, though severe complications are rare. These findings could improve patient counseling when discussing testicular cancer therapy options.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a testikulární nádory $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D013736
650    12
$a germinální a embryonální nádory $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D009373
650    12
$a lymfadenektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D008197
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a retroperitoneální prostor $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D012187
650    12
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $x normy $7 D017410
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a morbidita $7 D009017
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a urologie $x normy $7 D014572
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a scoping review $7 D000098583
700    1_
$a Dahlem, Roland $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Hartmann, Michael $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a von Deimling, Markus $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Schulz, Robert J $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Klemm, David $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Janisch, Florian $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; ⁠ Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States; ⁠ Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Department of Urology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
700    1_
$a Fisch, Margit $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Vetterlein, Malte W $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: m.vetterlein@uke.de
773    0_
$w MED00004468 $t Surgical oncology $x 1879-3320 $g Roč. 60 (20250509), s. 102228
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40378498 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731090948 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366326 $s 1252555
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 60 $c - $d 102228 $e 20250509 $i 1879-3320 $m Surgical oncology $n Surg Oncol $x MED00004468
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...