Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions for Older People in the Community: Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the ADRe Profile

V. Logan, N. Carter, D. Hughes, A. Turner, S. Jordan

. 2025 ; 2025 (-) : 9921349. [pub] 20250514

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015740

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), particularly in the context of polypharmacy, remain a persistent, unresolved problem for patients and healthcare professionals. The ADRe Profile identifies medicine-related harms, and supports their resolution, thereby improving care quality and preventing future problems. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the ADRe Profile (https://www.swansea.ac.uk/adre/) in U.K. primary care general practices, building on assessments in other settings. Methods: The ADRe Profile's validity and reliability were investigated using complementary mixed methods: content validity index, contrast group construct validity, cognitive interviewing, and inter-rater reliability. Results: Cognitive interviews (n = 5) confirmed that the ADRe Profile needed only minor adjustments. The scale-level content validity index was 0.67 (n = 14), items ranging from 0.08 to 1. Significant differences in signs and symptoms associated with ADRs between service users taking different numbers of regular prescribed medicines confirmed construct validity (n = 68, U = 870.50, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability testing showed substantial agreement between service users and research nurse: 10 items had 100% agreement. Overall kappa mean was 0.71 (range: 0.31-1), (n = 42). Conclusions and Relevance: The ADRe Profile is suitable for use with older service users in primary care who live at home. Users understood the questions and provided meaningful answers. ADRe Profile responses were sufficiently reliable to be used as a basis for further investigations, prescriber referral and clinical actions. However, clinician judgement of content validity may depend on knowledge and experience, highlighting the importance of training. Clinicians acknowledged that the ADRe Profile was comprehensive but identified practical difficulties. Instruments to reduce ADRs should be validated before testing in feasibility studies and randomised controlled trials. Implications for Nursing Management: Managers need to optimise patient safety by introducing patient-centred symptom monitoring, with decision support. Before instruments are adopted, managers should check the reliability and validity data. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04663360.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015740
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091213.0
007      
ta
008      
250708e20250514enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1155/jonm/9921349 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40401039
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Logan, Vera $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000174370272
245    10
$a Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions for Older People in the Community: Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the ADRe Profile / $c V. Logan, N. Carter, D. Hughes, A. Turner, S. Jordan
520    9_
$a Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), particularly in the context of polypharmacy, remain a persistent, unresolved problem for patients and healthcare professionals. The ADRe Profile identifies medicine-related harms, and supports their resolution, thereby improving care quality and preventing future problems. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the ADRe Profile (https://www.swansea.ac.uk/adre/) in U.K. primary care general practices, building on assessments in other settings. Methods: The ADRe Profile's validity and reliability were investigated using complementary mixed methods: content validity index, contrast group construct validity, cognitive interviewing, and inter-rater reliability. Results: Cognitive interviews (n = 5) confirmed that the ADRe Profile needed only minor adjustments. The scale-level content validity index was 0.67 (n = 14), items ranging from 0.08 to 1. Significant differences in signs and symptoms associated with ADRs between service users taking different numbers of regular prescribed medicines confirmed construct validity (n = 68, U = 870.50, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability testing showed substantial agreement between service users and research nurse: 10 items had 100% agreement. Overall kappa mean was 0.71 (range: 0.31-1), (n = 42). Conclusions and Relevance: The ADRe Profile is suitable for use with older service users in primary care who live at home. Users understood the questions and provided meaningful answers. ADRe Profile responses were sufficiently reliable to be used as a basis for further investigations, prescriber referral and clinical actions. However, clinician judgement of content validity may depend on knowledge and experience, highlighting the importance of training. Clinicians acknowledged that the ADRe Profile was comprehensive but identified practical difficulties. Instruments to reduce ADRs should be validated before testing in feasibility studies and randomised controlled trials. Implications for Nursing Management: Managers need to optimise patient safety by introducing patient-centred symptom monitoring, with decision support. Before instruments are adopted, managers should check the reliability and validity data. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04663360.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a nežádoucí účinky léčiv $x prevence a kontrola $7 D064420
650    _2
$a polypharmacy $7 D019338
650    12
$a psychometrie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $x normy $7 D011594
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
651    _2
$a Spojené království $7 D006113
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Carter, Neil $u Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000313278661
700    1_
$a Hughes, David $u Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000276317763
700    1_
$a Turner, Adam $u Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000207217662
700    1_
$a Jordan, Sue $u Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000256912987
773    0_
$w MED00007298 $t Journal of nursing management $x 1365-2834 $g Roč. 2025 (20250514), s. 9921349
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40401039 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091208 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366531 $s 1252865
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 2025 $c - $d 9921349 $e 20250514 $i 1365-2834 $m Journal of nursing management $n J Nurs Manag $x MED00007298
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...