• Something wrong with this record ?

The social conception of space of birth according to women with positive birth experiences: A trans-European study

YJ. Kuipers, G. Thomson, E. van Beeck, E. Hresanová, J. Goberna-Tricas, SR. Martin, SR. Cuker, L. Chudaska, I. Waldner, C. Zenzmaier, J. Leinweber

. 2025 ; 38 (3) : 101916. [pub] 20250430

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: The social space of birth-the birth environment, its occupants, and the human activities taking place-is interconnected with birth experiences. AIM: To investigate how the reality of the social space of birth affects women's positive birth experiences. METHODS: We combined open-text responses to the Babies Born Better survey from 3633 postpartum women in Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom and 39 interview transcripts from Czech and Dutch postpartum women. We conducted a textual and thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Three themes and 11 categories were generated: (1) Exercising fundamental human agency in the birth space consists of the categories: 'exercising rights', 'the protection of human vulnerability', and 'the freedom to be authentic', which women regard as prerequisite components of the birth space. (2) Regulatory frameworks & care philosophies in maternity services, including the categories '(financial) regulations', 'values of the care provider and the institution', and 'model of care', are regarded as attributes of the birth space. Theme (3) Building a nest for comfort and connection comprises the categories 'relational and affective atmosphere during labour & birth', 'performative atmosphere during labour & birth', 'shelter', 'implicit and explicit tacit doing & being' and 'symbol of deeper meaning'. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The reality of the birth space of women with positive birth experiences consists of human rights and birth rights, the quality of interactions with care providers during labour and birth in a relationship-centred and relation-continuity model of care, and a place to retreat from the world.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015840
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091250.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101916 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40311586
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kuipers, Yvonne J $u School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh, Scotland EH11 4BN, United Kingdom; Department of Health and Life Science, AP University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Noorderplaats 2, Antwerp 2000, Belgium. Electronic address: y.kuipers@napier.ac.uk
245    14
$a The social conception of space of birth according to women with positive birth experiences: A trans-European study / $c YJ. Kuipers, G. Thomson, E. van Beeck, E. Hresanová, J. Goberna-Tricas, SR. Martin, SR. Cuker, L. Chudaska, I. Waldner, C. Zenzmaier, J. Leinweber
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The social space of birth-the birth environment, its occupants, and the human activities taking place-is interconnected with birth experiences. AIM: To investigate how the reality of the social space of birth affects women's positive birth experiences. METHODS: We combined open-text responses to the Babies Born Better survey from 3633 postpartum women in Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom and 39 interview transcripts from Czech and Dutch postpartum women. We conducted a textual and thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Three themes and 11 categories were generated: (1) Exercising fundamental human agency in the birth space consists of the categories: 'exercising rights', 'the protection of human vulnerability', and 'the freedom to be authentic', which women regard as prerequisite components of the birth space. (2) Regulatory frameworks & care philosophies in maternity services, including the categories '(financial) regulations', 'values of the care provider and the institution', and 'model of care', are regarded as attributes of the birth space. Theme (3) Building a nest for comfort and connection comprises the categories 'relational and affective atmosphere during labour & birth', 'performative atmosphere during labour & birth', 'shelter', 'implicit and explicit tacit doing & being' and 'symbol of deeper meaning'. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The reality of the birth space of women with positive birth experiences consists of human rights and birth rights, the quality of interactions with care providers during labour and birth in a relationship-centred and relation-continuity model of care, and a place to retreat from the world.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a porod $x psychologie $7 D036801
650    _2
$a kvalitativní výzkum $7 D036301
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a poporodní období $x psychologie $7 D049590
650    12
$a sociální prostředí $7 D012931
650    12
$a matky $x psychologie $7 D009035
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Thomson, Gill $u School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire PR1 2HE, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a van Beeck, Elise $u Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3000 CA, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Hresanová, Ema $u Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, U Krize 8, Prague 158 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Goberna-Tricas, Josefina $u Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal and Child Health Nursing, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Health Sciences Campus, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, Barcelona 08907, Spain
700    1_
$a Martin, Sara Rodriguez $u School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh, Scotland EH11 4BN, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Cuker, Simona Ruta $u Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, U Krize 8, Prague 158 00, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chudaska, Lisa $u Institute of Midwifery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charite pl. 1, Berlin 10117, Germany
700    1_
$a Waldner, Irmi $u Institute of Midwifery, FHG Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innrain 98, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
700    1_
$a Zenzmaier, Christoph $u Institute of Midwifery, FHG Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innrain 98, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
700    1_
$a Leinweber, Julia $u Institute of Midwifery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charite pl. 1, Berlin 10117, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00166579 $t Women and birth $x 1878-1799 $g Roč. 38, č. 3 (2025), s. 101916
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40311586 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091245 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366577 $s 1252965
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 38 $c 3 $d 101916 $e 20250430 $i 1878-1799 $m Women and birth $n Women Birth $x MED00166579
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...