-
Something wrong with this record ?
Improving machine learning-based bitewing segmentation with synthetic data
E. Tolstaya, A. Tichy, S. Paris, F. Schwendicke
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted * methods MeSH
- Machine Learning * MeSH
- Dental Implants MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Class imbalance in datasets is one of the challenges of machine learning (ML) in medical image analysis. We employed synthetic data to overcome class imbalance when segmenting bitewing radiographs as an exemplary task for using ML. METHODS: After segmenting bitewings into classes, i.e. dental structures, restorations, and background, the pixel-level representation of implants in the training set (1543 bitewings) and testing set (177 bitewings) was 0.03 % and 0.07 %, respectively. A diffusion model and a generative adversarial network (pix2pix) were used to generate a dataset synthetically enriched in implants. A U-Net segmentation model was trained on (1) the original dataset, (2) the synthetic dataset, (3) on the synthetic dataset and fine-tuned on the original dataset, or (4) on a dataset which was naïvely oversampled with images containing implants. RESULTS: U-Net trained on the original dataset was unable to segment implants in the testing set. Model performance was significantly improved by naïve over-sampling, achieving the highest precision. The model trained only on synthetic data performed worse than naïve over-sampling in all metrics, but with fine-tuning on original data, it resulted in the highest Dice score, recall, F1 score and ROC AUC, respectively. The performance on other classes than implants was similar for all strategies except training only on synthetic data, which tended to perform worse. CONCLUSIONS: The use of synthetic data alone may deteriorate the performance of segmentation models. However, fine-tuning on original data could significantly enhance model performance, especially for heavily underrepresented classes. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study explored the use of synthetic data to enhance segmentation of bitewing radiographs, focusing on underrepresented classes like implants. Pre-training on synthetic data followed by fine-tuning on original data yielded the best results, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to advance AI-driven dental imaging and ultimately support clinical decision-making.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25015924
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731091348.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708e20250309enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105679 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40068717
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Tolstaya, Ekaterina $u Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestraße 70, 80 336, Munich, Germany
- 245 10
- $a Improving machine learning-based bitewing segmentation with synthetic data / $c E. Tolstaya, A. Tichy, S. Paris, F. Schwendicke
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Class imbalance in datasets is one of the challenges of machine learning (ML) in medical image analysis. We employed synthetic data to overcome class imbalance when segmenting bitewing radiographs as an exemplary task for using ML. METHODS: After segmenting bitewings into classes, i.e. dental structures, restorations, and background, the pixel-level representation of implants in the training set (1543 bitewings) and testing set (177 bitewings) was 0.03 % and 0.07 %, respectively. A diffusion model and a generative adversarial network (pix2pix) were used to generate a dataset synthetically enriched in implants. A U-Net segmentation model was trained on (1) the original dataset, (2) the synthetic dataset, (3) on the synthetic dataset and fine-tuned on the original dataset, or (4) on a dataset which was naïvely oversampled with images containing implants. RESULTS: U-Net trained on the original dataset was unable to segment implants in the testing set. Model performance was significantly improved by naïve over-sampling, achieving the highest precision. The model trained only on synthetic data performed worse than naïve over-sampling in all metrics, but with fine-tuning on original data, it resulted in the highest Dice score, recall, F1 score and ROC AUC, respectively. The performance on other classes than implants was similar for all strategies except training only on synthetic data, which tended to perform worse. CONCLUSIONS: The use of synthetic data alone may deteriorate the performance of segmentation models. However, fine-tuning on original data could significantly enhance model performance, especially for heavily underrepresented classes. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study explored the use of synthetic data to enhance segmentation of bitewing radiographs, focusing on underrepresented classes like implants. Pre-training on synthetic data followed by fine-tuning on original data yielded the best results, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to advance AI-driven dental imaging and ultimately support clinical decision-making.
- 650 12
- $a strojové učení $7 D000069550
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a zubní implantáty $7 D015921
- 650 12
- $a počítačové zpracování obrazu $x metody $7 D007091
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Tichy, Antonin $u Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestraße 70, 80 336, Munich, Germany; Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Karlovo namesti 32, 121 11, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Paris, Sebastian $u Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Assmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Schwendicke, Falk $u Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestraße 70, 80 336, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: Falk.Schwendicke@med.uni-muenchen.de
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002631 $t Journal of dentistry $x 1879-176X $g Roč. 156 (20250309), s. 105679
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40068717 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731091342 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366635 $s 1253049
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 156 $c - $d 105679 $e 20250309 $i 1879-176X $m Journal of dentistry $n J Dent $x MED00002631
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708